Search

This paper analyses the "border" position of counselling services in Italian universities. The concept of "border" has great relevance in the work of psychoanalytically oriented university students' counsellors. Counselling is part of a continuum of interventions, from befriending to psychotherapy. This closeness encompasses the need for identifying specificities and differences among interventions. Moreover, a university counselling service occupies a "marginal" position, continuously confronted with the risks of rejection and/or assimilation. The concept of "border" is also useful to define the developmental phase of university students, crossing the border between late adolescence and young adulthood, as represented by Conrad's novel "The shadow line" (1917/1999), recently analysed by Green (2008) as the metaphoric demarcation line between youth and adulthood. Finally, most of the students referring to our counselling service come from families that for the first time crossed the border of university education. (Contains 3 notes.)

Clinical management of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is still not satisfactory despite the availability of effective pharmacological agents. This is in part linked to the lack of clarity regarding certain essential aspects of BTcP, including terminology, definition, epidemiology and assessment. Other barriers to effective management include a widespread prejudice among doctors and patients concerning the use of opioids, and inadequate assessment of pain severity, resulting in the prescription of ineffective drugs or doses. This review presents an overview of the appropriate and inappropriate actions to take in the diagnosis and treatment of BTcP, as determined by a panel of experts in the field. The ultimate aim is to provide a practical contribution to the unresolved issues in the management of BTcP. Five 'things to do' and five 'things not to do' in the diagnosis and treatment of BTcP are proposed, and evidence supporting said recommendations are described. It is the duty of all healthcare workers involved in managing cancer patients to be mindful of the possibility of BTcP occurrence and not to underestimate its severity. It is vital that all the necessary steps are carried out to establish an accurate and timely diagnosis, principally by establishing effective communication with the patient, the main information source. It is crucial that BTcP is treated with an effective pharmacological regimen and drug(s), dose and administration route prescribed are designed to suit the particular type of pain and importantly the individual needs of the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: To test current systems evaluating for fecal continence after total anorectal reconstruction (TAR) we adapted the incontinence plus evacuation scoring system proposed by the Working Party on Anal Sphincter Replacement (WPASR)., Patients and Methods: We examined 51 monthly diaries recorded by 14 patients after TAR or at yearly checks (up to 5 years). A form detailing all items and frequencies of the WPASR system was given to 12 patients who assigned a rating to each item in a frequency cell. The mean values of cells were rounded off, and a 0-20 scoring scale was obtained. We corrected the scores using previously defined criteria aimed at complying with an objective rating of severity while preserving the overall patient rating. Diaries were reevaluated by both patient-rated and surgeon-corrected scales, and the correlation was calculated to each other and to Jorge and Wexner's and the Williams et al. systems; correlations between incontinence and evacuation scores were also calculated., Results: The surgeon-corrected system tended to have a lower mean score than the patient-rated one and was strongly correlated with it ( r=0.984), a significantly higher mean score than the Jorge and Wexner scale ( r=0.893), and a significantly lower mean score than the Williams et al. classification (quadrupled scores; r=0.857). No correlations between incontinence and evacuation were found., Conclusions: Although not validated, the patient-rated, surgeon-corrected adjustment of the WPASR system proved in our patients a reliable instrument for functional assessment. Its consensus administration to any given patient samples requires further research.