1. "Let us help them to raise their children into good citizens": the Lone-Parent Families Act and the wages of care-giving in Israel.
- Author
-
Helman S
- Subjects
- Delivery of Health Care economics, Delivery of Health Care ethnology, Delivery of Health Care history, Delivery of Health Care legislation & jurisprudence, Family ethnology, Family history, Family psychology, Gender Identity, Government history, Government Programs economics, Government Programs education, Government Programs history, Government Programs legislation & jurisprudence, History, 20th Century, Israel ethnology, Social Welfare economics, Social Welfare ethnology, Social Welfare history, Social Welfare legislation & jurisprudence, Social Welfare psychology, Caregivers economics, Caregivers education, Caregivers history, Caregivers legislation & jurisprudence, Caregivers psychology, Employment economics, Employment history, Employment legislation & jurisprudence, Employment psychology, Legislation as Topic economics, Legislation as Topic history, Public Policy economics, Public Policy history, Public Policy legislation & jurisprudence, Single-Parent Family ethnology, Single-Parent Family psychology
- Abstract
Based on the assumption that the construction of meaning in the process of policy-making is crucial if we wish to understand the gender outcomes of social policy, this article analyzes the parliamentary debates that preceded and accompanied the legislation of the Israeli Mono-Parental Families Act, 1992. It focuses on the enunciation of gender roles and relations in the discourses that framed and justified the Act as well as on how the capacity to establish and maintain autonomous households was constructed and legitimized. Two sets of discourses emerged during the deliberations over the Act, each of which endeavored to interpret the needs, identities, and capacities for action among lone-parent families. The article shows how a specific version of the capacity to establish and maintain autonomous households—that of caregivers who happen to be workers—was privileged in the policy paradigm underlying the Act. The alternative vision—that of workers with caregiving responsibilities—was marginalized and eventually disregarded in the final wording and implementation of the Act. The article concludes with an analysis of the socio-political processes that underlie the prioritization of the version, which was ultimately expressed in the implementation of the Act. It is suggested that a state-level collective identity project shaped by demographic concerns and geo-political factors and changes in the political economy combined to define the needs, identities, and capacities for action of lone-parent families in terms of a model of motherhood in which care-giving trumped paid work.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF