Search

Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), has been approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, based on the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this all-oral triplet, compared with lenalidomide-dexamethasone. However, clinical trial outcomes do not always translate into real-world outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of ixazomib-based combination for treatment of patients with RRMM in a real-world setting. All consecutive RRMM patients who received at least one cycle of ixazomib-based treatment combination between June 2013 and June 2018 were identified. Data was extracted from medical charts focusing on demographics, disease characteristics, prior treatment, and responses. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. A total of 78 patients across 7 sites were retrospectively included. Median follow-up was 22 months. Median age was 68 (range 38-90). Sixty-four percent received ixazomib in 2nd line, 19% in 3rd line. Overall, 89% of patients had been exposed to PIs (bortezomib 87%) prior to IRd, 41% to IMiDs. Twenty-nine (48%, of 60 available) had high (t(4:14), t(14:16), del17p) or intermediate (+1q21) risk aberrations. Most patients (82%) received ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. An exploratory assessment for disease aggressiveness at diagnosis was classified by a treating physician as indolent (rapid control to protect from target organ damage not required) vs aggressive (imminent target organ damage) in 63% vs 37%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with a low discontinuation rate (11%). Median PFS on ixazomib therapy was 24 months (95% CI 17-30). PFS was 77% and 47% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median OS was not reached; OS was 91% and 80% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Higher LDH, older age, and worse clinical aggressiveness were associated with worse PFS, whereas a deeper response to ixazomib (≥ VGPR) and a longer response to first-line bortezomib (≥ 24 m) were associated with an improved PFS on ixazomib. No effect on PFS was found for cytogenetic risk by FISH, ISS/rISS, and prior anti-myeloma treatment. Ixazomib-based combinations are efficacious and safe regimens in RRMM patients in the real-world setting, regardless to cytogenetic risk, with a PFS of 24 months comparable with clinical trial data. This regimen had most favorable outcomes among patients who remained progression-free more than 24 months after a bortezomib induction and for those who have a more indolent disease phenotype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We identified two novel cytogenetic markers of poor outcome in multiple myeloma patients. • Deletion in the IGH variable region was associated with worse PFS and response to treatment. • Amplification of the IGH constant region was associated with worse PFS. • The correlation remained valid in subgroup analysis of patients with high risk cytogenetics. • Both aberrations can be detected during routine FISH analysis of MM bone marrow. Cytogenetic abnormalities are a recognized factor in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma (MM). While chromosomal translocations involving the IGH gene have been investigated and reported, the implications of deletions or amplifications in the IGH gene have been less frequently examined. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 260 patients with MM from Northern Israel. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of separated CD-138 positive cells was done on bone marrow samples collected between 2016 and 2018. We used IGH break apart probes to identify IGH abnormalities and performed statistical analysis of clinical and prognostic features, comparing the different cytogenetic groups. Deletions in the variable region of the IGH (IGHv) were found in 17.3 % (n = 45) of patients and correlated with significantly worse progression free survival (PFS) after two years of follow up (p = 0.008), as well as with a worse response to 1st line treatment (p = 0.037). The median PFS was 7.1 and 17.7 months in patients with and without IGHv deletion, respectively. PFS differences remained significant (p = 0.017) in subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk cytogenetics (n = 108, 19 with IGHv deletion). Overall survival was not significantly different in the two groups. Constant region (IGHc) amplifications, were less frequently found (6.15 %, n = 16), yet significantly correlated with worse PFS after two years of follow up (p = 0.023). This difference remained valid in the high-risk subgroup (p = 0.001). In Conclusion, we identified that deletion of the IGH variable region and amplification in the IGH constant region, are both associated with poor prognosis and inferior outcome in MM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Solitary plasmacytoma (SP) is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia. In this retrospective multicenter study, 68 SP patients were included. Compared to solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma (SEP), patients with solitary bone plasmacytoma (SBP) were younger (57.3 vs. 70.9 years, p  = 0.031), had larger plasmacytoma (median: 5.4 vs. 3 cm, p  = 0.007) and higher median involved free light chain level (61 vs. 25.8 mg/L, p  = 0.056). 92.6% of patients were treated by radiotherapy and 11.8% received systemic anti-myeloma treatment. With a median follow-up of 42 months, 45.6% of patients progressed (8.8% - recurrent SP, 36.8% - active myeloma). The median PFS was 58 months and the median OS has not been reached (10-year OS: 84.8%). Patients who received also anti-myeloma treatment had longer PFS compared to those who did not (median not reached vs. 48 months, p  = 0.056). In conclusion, SBP and SEP appear to be different diseases. Radiotherapy is the cornerstone in the SP treatment. A large prospective trial is needed to evaluate the impact of adding systemic anti-myeloma treatment to local radiotherapy.

The BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with high incidence of venous thrombosis and a significant rate of recurrent events, but there is no consensus regarding their management. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 96 patients with MPN-related venous thrombosis. The index venous thrombosis occurred at a median age of 58 years (IQR 37-71), with 58% of the events involving unusual sites. Patients who were on antiplatelet agents at the time of index thrombosis tended to be older than patients who were not receiving antiplatelets at the time of index thrombosis. The majority of index thromboses occurring after the diagnosis of MPN had uncontrolled blood counts at the time of event and were not receiving antithrombotic agents. Following the thrombotic episode, 75% of patients received long-term anticoagulation. At a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the recurrence rate was 14%. Thrombophilia was significantly more prevalent among patients with recurrent thrombosis compared to patients without recurrence (p < 0.01). Patients who developed a recurrent event early were more likely to have thrombophilia (either inherited or antiphospholipid antibodies), and controlled blood counts, and were likely to receive anticoagulation at the time of recurrence compared to patients with later recurrences. Thrombophilia may contribute to venous thrombosis recurrence, especially early after the index venous thrombosis. Suboptimal anticoagulation and blood count control are factors associated with late venous thrombosis recurrence., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

We investigated incidence, characteristics and outcome of patients with macrofocal multiple myeloma (MFMM) treated mainly with novel therapies. Based on definition (BMPCs <20% and lytic lesions/plasmacytomas, without anemia, renal insufficiency or hypercalcemia) we identified 140 patients with MFMM, among 4650 myeloma patients (3%). Twice the number of patients with typical myeloma were used as controls; 60% were <65 years and 70% had advanced bone disease. Plasmacytomas were more frequent in MFMM compared with standard myeloma (68% vs 15%, P < .05). Adverse prognostic parameters (high lactate dehydrogenase, advanced stage, high risk cytogenetics, immunoparesis) were less common in patients with MFMM compared with controls (P < .05); 90% received novel agents and 47% underwent autologous transplantation upfront; 90% achieved an objective response; 70% had at least very good partial response which was significantly higher compared with controls (P < .05). After a median follow-up of 52 months, 33 patients have died. Early death (<12 months) was infrequent in MFMM. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 46 and 129 months respectively, both significantly longer compared with controls (P < .001). Proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based therapy was the only independent predictor for OS in the multivariate analysis (HR: 3.9; P < .001). In conclusion, MFMM is a distinct entity presented in young and elderly subjects, characterized by limited bone marrow infiltration, advanced bone disease and frequent presence of plasmacytomas; MFMM patients have less often adverse prognostic features and achieve excellent responses and prolonged OS especially when treated with PI-based therapies. Novel imaging will help in a more accurate classification of this entity., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Ruxolitinib is established as treatment for symptomatic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis. The strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and dose modification rules that applied to the COMFORTI and II studies that led to the licensing of ruxolitinib are not always applicable to routine clinical practice. Thus physicians now face decisions regarding ruxolitinib use that were not addressed in these pivotal trials., Methods: We performed an online survey of hematologists practicing in Europe, Israel, the United Kingdom and the United States. Demographic details regarding the physicians and their practice as relates to MPNs were collected. Management decisions pertaining to the use of ruxolitinib were obtained regarding 10 clinical scenarios relating to anemia, thrombocytopenia, frailty, infection and lack or loss of response to ruxolitnib in MF patients., Results: 140 physicians responded to the survey. There were marked differences regarding their decisions for ruxolitinib administration in MF patients with or developing anemia or thrombocytopenia. Similarly there was little consensus regarding management of patients refractory or losing a response to ruxolitinib. There were differences between "MPN-focused" and "non-MPN-focused" physicians in certain areas., Conclusion: Physician practices regarding management of MF patients experiencing ruxolitinib-related toxicities or in whom response to the drug is lost was variable. This was true of "MPN-focused" and "non-MPN-focused" physicians in certain cases. Physician education and experience in using ruxolitinib may improve patient management., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)