Search

We sought to investigate the impact of air purifiers in the removal of particular matter (PM)10, PM2.5, PM1, and particle number concentration (PNC) in the indoor air of dormitories located at Iran's largest medical university, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Twelve rooms were selected and randomly assigned to two rooms: sham air purifier system deployed room (SR) and true air purifier system deployed room (TR). All study samples were drawn simultaneously from assigned rooms using portable GRIMM dust monitors for 24 h. The PM monitors of air were positioned in the middle of each room next to the air purifier at the height of the breathing zone (1.5 m in height). The mean PM10, PM2.5, PM1, and PNC removal efficiency in rooms with and without a smoker were measured to be 40.7 vs 83.8%, 31.2 vs 78.4%, 29.9 vs 72.3%, and 44.3 vs 75.6%, respectively. The results showed that smoking is an important influencing factor on the indoor air quality; smoking lowered the removal efficiency of PM10, PM2.5, PM1, and PNC by 43%, 47%, 43%, and 31%, respectively. An air purifier could decline the PM10 and PM2.5 even lower than the WHO 24-h guideline level in non-smoker rooms. This study revealed that using household air purifiers in rooms with smokers and non-smokers significantly reduces the non-carcinogenic risks of exposure to PM10 and PM2.5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, the efficiency of air cleaners in removal of chemical components of PM 2.5 (PAHs, heavy metals, and ions) in the indoor air of dormitories of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran were assessed. 12 rooms were selected and randomly divided into two groups: sham air purifier system deployed room (SR) vs. true air purifier system deployed room (TR). 24-h PM 2.5 samples were simultaneously collected in both TR and SR on PTFE filter papers at a flow rate of 5 L/min. The results showed overall removal efficiency of 76.5 ± 15.5%, 63.1 ± 22.5%, and 66.2 ± 24.8% for PAHs, heavy metals and ions, respectively. Moreover, the fraction of positive ions decreased when air purifiers were used in the rooms. The results showed that the smoking is an important influencing factor on the indoor air quality; smoking can leads to reduction in removal efficiency of PAHs, heavy metals and ions by 26%, 40%, and 51%, respectively. An air purifier could decreased the PM 2.5 even lower than the WHO annual guideline level in non-smoker rooms. The present study revealed that use of indoor air purifiers can significantly reduce the risk of carcinogenicity and non-carcinogenicity attributed to heavy metals and PAHs, especially in places without a smoker. [Display omitted] • Efficiency of air purifiers (AP) in removal of components of PM 2.5 was investigated. • The results showed removal of 76.5%, 63.1%, and 66.2% for PAHs, metals and ions, respectively. • Smoking leads to efficiency reduction of PAHs, metals and ions by 26%, 40%, and 51%, respectively. • AP could decline the PM 2.5 even lower than the WHO guideline in non-smoker rooms. • AP can significantly reduce the health risks attributed to metals and PAHs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]