Search

The article discusses the foreign policy views and advisers of Republican 2012 U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney. It describes his statements on foreign policy during the campaign as closely aligned with the policies of former U.S. President George W. Bush. Romney foreign policy advisers who espouse neoconservative views are listed, including John Bolton, Paula Dobriansky, and Eric Edelman. Topics include Romney's likely support for an Israeli military attack on Iran's nuclear facilities and an increase in U.S. military spending.

The article discusses the foreign policy viewpoints of the U.S. Republican Party, or Grand Old Party (GOP), in light of the 2012 U.S. Presidential election, which Republican candidate Mitt Romney lost. The author looks at political leadership within the Republican Party on foreign policy issues, the campaign rhetoric of American exceptionalism espoused by President Barack Obama, as well as the Republican Party's connection to former U.S. President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. Topics include foreign policy issues such as the U.S.'s concern about Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, China's currency and its impact on U.S. trade, as well as the U.S.'s role in the Arab Spring popular uprisings.

The article presents a speech by Mitt Romney, U.S. presidential candidate for 2012, delivered at the Jerusalem Foundation, held on July 29, 2012, in which he discussed the resilience of the Israeli people, the vital national security interest of the U.S. and the effort to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran.

The article presents the author's views regarding the role of undecided voters in the swing states and the role of media during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Topics include the predicted performance of U.S. President Barack Obama in the November 6, 2012 election against Republican candidate Mitt Romney; possible negotiations between the Obama administration and Iran; and U.S. foreign policy.

The author expresses his opinion on the state of the European economy and Iran's nuclear program in the summer of 2012. Topics include how the European banks are attempting to stimulate the economies by devaluing their currencies, the possibility that a U.S.-sponsored Israeli military will attack Iran's nuclear facilities in Tehran, and the effects of these global crises on U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney's nomination acceptance speech.

The article focuses on foreign policy issues that could cause U.S. President Barack Obama difficulties during the 2012 Presidential elections. It states Obama's foreign policy decisions have been mostly successful and talks about his decision to send a military special forces SEAL team to go after terrorist Osama bin Laden, along with his plans to start withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. It mentions potential problems Obama might encounter with Iranian militarism and China's economic policies.

The article looks at 2012 U.S. presidential election, focusing on foreign policy issues. It notes Republican nominee Mitt Romney's foreign policy statements emphasize military strength and U.S. power. It discusses his and U.S. President Barack Obama's views of issues in the Middle East, including Iran's development of nuclear weapons, the Syrian revolution, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Other topics include the U.S. stance toward Russia and commercial relations with China.

The article reports on Israeli policy toward Iran, focusing on the Israeli government's concern over Iran's development of nuclear weapons and its threat to take military action against Iranian nuclear facilities. It says the administration of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has suggested it would not take any such action before the November 2012 U.S. elections. Topics include Israeli opponents of an attack on Iran and the role of U.S.-Israel relations in the U.S. election.

The article questions whether a vote for the Republic Party in the 2012 U.S. elections is a vote for war. It discusses the possibility that a vote for Republican candidates Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich could create war against Iran. It asks why Israel, with all its nuclear weapons and the threat posed by nuclear Iran, refuse to deal with issue. It discusses the lack of hard evidence to prove that Iran has been acquiring nuclear weapons.

The article comments on why Iran is an important issue in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. According to the author, presidential candidate Mitt Romney's advisors are committed to military action against Iran. The author points that Romney's advisors are the same people who brought the Iraq War and the Global War on Terror. Romney believes that a nuclear Iran is the biggest danger to the U.S.

The article reports on the possible impact of a war involving Iran on the scheduled 2012 Presidential election in the U.S. It claims that an international development, specifically an assault in the Middle East, could have a huge effect in the race between re-electionist President Barack Obama and presumptive Grand Old Party (GOP) candidate Mitt Romney. Israeli political leaders like Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu consider Iran's nuclear capability as an immediate threat to their country.

The author discusses former U.S. National Security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski's view that a surprise attack by Israel on Iran on October 2012 could damage U.S. President Barack Obama's chances for reelection. The author cites a January 14, 2012 report by "Wall Street Journal" which states that U.S. defense leaders are increasingly wary of Israel preparing military action against Iran despite U.S. objections.

The article reports that the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama is ratcheting up its rhetoric against Iran, as the 2012 presidential election approaches. It states that the government have seized upon the latest report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in November 2011 with an aim to renew the U.S. claim that Tehran pursues a nuclear weapon. It mentions the U.S. administration and allies are content to enforce tighter sanctions on Iran.