Search

• Mapping soil particle size fractions (PSF) in central arid regions of Iran. • Proposing a patch-based, multi-task Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for digital soil mapping (DSM). • Demonstrating the superiority of CNN for DSM studies compared to the conventional random forest (RF) algorithm. Knowledge about the spatial distribution of soil particle size fractions (PSF) is critical for sustainable management and resource assessment of the agricultural regions. Although conventional machine learning algorithms, such as random forest (RF) or support vector machine, have been extensively used in digital soil mapping to predict the PSF, less research examined the potential of state-of-the-art deep learning approaches for such processing. Importantly, deep learning approaches such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are able to incorporate contextual information about the landscape, which is of great use for DSM analysis. Accordingly, this study addresses this much-needed investigation by using a patch-based, multi-task CNN for predicting PSF of clay, sand, and silt contents at six standard layers given as soil depth increments as recommended by the GlobalSoilMap.net (i.e., 0–5, 5–15, 15–30, 30–60, 60–100, 100–200 cm). The depth functions were derived from equal-area smoothing splines in a region covering large parts (~140,000 km2) of central Iran. The robustness of the proposed architecture is evaluated against RF. Additionally, to allow a fairer comparison between RF and CNN models, we used simple smoothing (mean) filters to effectively reproduce the auxiliary data which are then fed in the RF (RF*). To evaluate the three models, we established a training (75%) and test set (25%). According to the test set, for all soil depths and all PSFs, the results demonstrate that CNN consistently outperforms RF and RF* in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2). At the top layer, for example, CNN decreased the RMSE values for clay, sand, and silt contents compared to the RF (22.4%, 18.9%, and 10.7%) and RF* (18.0%, 7.4%, and 9.6%). These findings indicate that even the use of feature-engineered auxiliary data did not enable the RF* models to reach the performance of CNN. The resulting maps can be used as valuable baseline soil information for the effective management of agricultural and environmental resources in the study area and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]