Search

In this article, the author opines on efforts made by Hassan Rouhani, President of Iran, to improve relationship between Iran and the U.S. He also discusses various topics including a speech made by Rouhani to the United Nations (U.N.) in which he denied that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons, uranium enrichment program of Iran, and a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency on amount of uranium in Iran.

The article focuses on the international political aspects of the Iranian nuclear program and discusses the chances of war arising due to the U.S. President Barack Obama's stand towards it.

The author comments on U.S. President Barack Obama's stance on the nuclear program of Iran. Obama has declared that Iran's nuclear program is intolerable. However, the author points that Obama is standing by as Iran rapidly reaches nuclearization. The author further explains that Obama's incoherent policy is a declaration of passivity and weakness.

The author discusses the difference between the American foreign-policy positions on deterring Iran and deterring the Soviet Union. He agrees that Russia has not deployed a suicide bomber in 70 years of conflict while it is a routine for jihadists and Iranian suicide bombers. Also discussed is the ideological quarrel of the Soviet Union with the U.S. while quarrel of Israel with Iran is existential and the knowledge of both the U.S. and the Soviet Union that a nuclear war could destroy them.

The author explores his views on the move of Israeli Prime Minister Benjmin Netanyahu to bring the main opposition party into a national unity government. The new coalition government was announced on May 8, 2012 in a joint conference where Netanyahu shook hand with Kadima party leader Shaul Mofaz. The union changes Israel's position on Iran, says the article.

The author believes the approach of U.S. President Barack Obama's administration in dealing with the threat of Iran's nuclear capability is ineffective and inept, and to the detriment of Israel's national security. Iran triples its uranium output, conceals its enrichment facilities under a mountain and impedes International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections on its facilities. However, the focus of U.S. policy is perceived as preventing Israel from making a preemptive attack on Iran.

The author states his strong opinion against U.S. President Obama's position vis-a-vis the nuclear weapons threat posed by Iran. While the U.S. government has threatened Iran with sanctions, these measures have done nothing to slow down that country's nuclear program. While Israel seems eager to take action, Obama seems more inclined to suppress any intervention from this country, and continue to maintain open-ended negotiations with Iran so as not to jeopardize his political future.

The author criticizes how U.S. President Barack Obama emphasized the alleged increasing isolation of the Islamic Republic of Iran from the rest of the world. He describes the possible connection of such isolation claim to the acceleration of the Iranian nuclear program that the Obama administration has failed to deflect. He also mentions several reasons like the appointment of Iran to the United Nations (UN) Commission on the Status of Women that prove the allegation made against Iran is unlikely.

The author presents a commentary on U.S. President Barack Obama's debut speech at the United Nation's Security Council meeting in which he fails to address the issue on nuclear weapons development by Iran as evidenced by the presence of the nuclear enrichment facilities in Qom, Iran. He mentions French President Nicolas Sarkozy's astonished reaction to Obama's speech which he says does not contribute anything to the international community.