Search

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis using Tenecteplase (TNK) versus alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients within 4.5-hour window period. Methods: This retrospective study involved the collection of data from consecutive AIS patients who underwent thrombolysis in the Department of Neurology at a tertiary care university hospital, between May 2018 to January 2021. Data including clinical history, neurological assessment using modified Rankin score (mRS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), brain neuroimaging, treatment, and outcome details were collected. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with good functional recovery (mRS of 0–2) at 90 days of follow-up. Results: Total of 42 patients with AIS underwent thrombolysis, of which 19 received alteplase and 23 got TNK. The median (range) onset to door time [120 (20-210) versus 120 (30-210) minutes; P = 0.823] and median (range) onset to needle time [150 (60-255) versus 160 (50-240) minutes; P = 0.779] were comparable in both alteplase and TNK groups, respectively. The primary outcome of good functional recovery (mRS ≤2) at 3 months was observed in more than half the patients in each group and was comparable (P = 0.701). Post-thrombolysis complications including cerebral haemorrhage (symptomatic or asymptomatic) were comparable between the two groups (31.6% vs 30.4%; P = 0.936), except a significantly higher proportion of patients on TNK required mechanical ventilation (10.5% v/s 43.5%; P = 0.019). Conclusions: This study showed a comparable efficacy and safety profile of alteplase and TNK in thrombolysis of AIS throughout the 4.5 hours window period. Moreover, the ease of administration and better pharmacodynamic properties favors tenecteplase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted the already marginalized healthcare provision in resource limited countries like India. Aims: This study compared onset to door time and temporal trends of admissions to seek medical care in new onset acute ischaemic stroke during the COVID-19 period with a representative pre-COVID-19 period in rural background. Settings and Design: Prospective Cross-sectional study in a tertiary level hospital in North India. Methods and Material: Study included new onset acute ischaemic stroke admitted within first 2 weeks of symptoms onset. Subjects were divided into: Group A – Pre-COVID-19 stroke, Group B – Non-COVID-19 Stroke, and Group C - Stroke, positive for COVID-19. Detailed epidemiological, clinical profile, onset to door time and temporal trends of admissions were recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi square/Fisher's exact test and Independent Samples T test or Mann–Whitney U test were used for categorical and continuous variables. Results: Onset to door time in new onset acute ischaemic stroke was significantly prolonged by 6 h in COVID-19 period (median (interquartile range), 19 (12–27) h) as compared with pre-COVID-19 period. Admissions of new onset acute ischaemic stroke were significantly less in COVID-19 period. Comorbidities and severity of stroke (mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 20 ± 4) were more during the COVID-19 period. Incidence and mortality of COVID-19 positive new onset acute ischaemic stroke were 0.95% and 38%. Conclusions: Onset to door time in new onset acute ischaemic stroke was significantly prolonged in COVID-19 as compared with pre-COVID-19 period. The admissions were fewer with more severity and comorbidities in COVID-19 period. COVID-19 positive stroke patients had more severity and mortality as compared with non-COVID-19 stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]