Search

Xpert MTB/RIF is recommended for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in children. We determined the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children. The characteristics of children influencing Xpert MTB/RIF positivity were explored. Children aged <15 years with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary TB were prospectively enrolled from 2013 to 2019. Two sputum/early morning gastric aspirate specimens were collected for examination by smear (fluorescence microscopy), Xpert MTB/RIF, and culture [Mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT)/Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium]. Diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF was evaluated using LJ and or MGIT culture positivity as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Stratified analysis was done; P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Of the total 1727 enrolled children, 1674 (97%) with complete results for at least one sputum/gastric aspirate sample were analyzed. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF was 68.5% in sputum and 53.6% in gastric aspirate while the specificity was 99% for both. The sensitivity compared to smear was 68.5% vs. 33.7% (P < .001) and 53.6% vs. 14.5%; (P < .001) in sputum and gastric aspirate, respectively. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF was 23.9% with decision to treat as reference standard. Xpert MTB/RIF positivity was significantly influenced by sex, age, nutritional status, chest X-ray abnormality, TB infection status, and symptoms suggestive of TB. Xpert MTB/RIF as an upfront test compared to smear improves diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children yet the sensitivity is suboptimal. Newer TB diagnostic tools with improved sensitivity is warranted in children., (© The Author(s) [2024]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

A major challenge in tuberculosis is identifying correlates of a protective immune response. The Mycobacterial Growth Inhibition Assay (MGIA) is a functional assay providing an integrated measure of the host immune response to mycobacteria. However, its feasibility is limited by reliance on biosafety level 3 facilities, and its performance has not been widely evaluated in TB-endemic settings. Here, we compared two mycobacterial strains (M. tuberculosis H37Rv versus attenuated M. bovis BCG) in the performance of whole-blood MGIA in 30 TB-exposed children (median age 2 years) in Chennai, India. The time-to-positivity in both assays was similar (5.7 days vs 6 days) and the mycobacterial growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG were correlated (r = 0.64, p<0.0001). In Bland-Altman analysis, the bias was -0.54 days (95% limit of agreement -2.08, 0.99). Collectively, our results indicate that M. tuberculosis H37Rv can be substituted with the less virulent M. bovis BCG strain to improve feasibility of the MGIA assay, particularly in low-income settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

SETTING: TBM-KIDS is a phase I/II trial enrolling children with tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in three tertiary referral centers in India and Malawi. OBJECTIVE: To describe the challenges encountered in conducting the first randomized clinical trial of antimicrobial agents in pediatric TBM. DESIGN: The sources of the data were primarily monthly trial reports, non-enrollment case report forms, study diaries and registers maintained for recruitment, experiences shared by key team members during regular study calls and comments from site review visits. We reviewed, broadly categorized, and describe in detail the challenges encountered by study teams in trial implementation. RESULTS: Over 17 months, 3371 children with clinical presentations consistent with meningoencephalitis or undergoing lumbar puncture were assessed for eligibility; 21 (<1%) met enrollment criteria. We encountered challenges related to diagnosis, management of sick children, large catchment areas, adverse event attribution, concomitant medications, infrastructure requirements, expensive pediatric formulations with short expiry, and detection of treatment response in a highly variable disease across the age continuum. Training and adaptation of tools for neurocognitive and neurologic function assessment were necessary. Special care was undertaken to explain study participation to distraught caregivers and manage children longitudinally. CONCLUSION: Interventional trials in pediatric TBM are challenging but are critically important for improving the treatment of a disease that disables children physically, cognitively and emotionally. Sharing these challenges may help to address them more effectively as a TB research community and to advance treatments for this at-risk population.