Search

Objectives: The goals were to study • The pattern of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and its clinical implications • The impact of chemotherapy response grade (CRG) on survival METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) between January 2013 to December 2017 was performed. The surgical and pathological reports were analyzed and surgical and pathological PCI compared. The pathological response to chemotherapy was assessed using the score developed by Bohm. et al., Results: In 79 patients, it was observed that sites involved by disease first like ovaries and pelvic peritoneum (lower region) were the last to respond preceded by the omentum, right upper quadrant (RUQ) peritoneum (upper region) and parietal peritoneum (middle region). Microscopic residual disease was seen in 20.2% in normal looking areas of peritoneum and in 20% with no gross residual disease in the RUQ. Visual inspection during surgery overestimated the disease extent in 40.5% and underestimated it in 15.1%. There was no difference in the progression free (p = 0.587) and overall survival (p = 0.157) between patients with CRG 1, 2 and 3 (poor, moderate, and complete/near complete response, respectively). Retroperitoneal nodes were positive in 0% with CRG 3, 27.5% with CRG 2 and 72.7% with CRG 1 (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The pathological response to NACT follows a specific pattern. Visual inspection is of limited value in assessing disease extent following NACT. Surgery following NACT should target sites involved before NACT and not just residual disease. The response in regional nodes should be included in chemotherapy response scores., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Indian HIPEC registry is a self-funded registry instituted by a group of Indian surgeons for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) undergoing surgical treatment. This work was performed to  • Evaluate outcomes of cytoreductive surgery ± HIPEC in patients enrolled in the registry.  • Identify operational problems., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the registry from March 2016 to September 2017 was performed. An online survey was performed to study the surgeons' attitudes and existing practices pertaining to the registry and identify operational problems., Results: During the study period, 332 patients were enrolled in 8 participating centres. The common indication was ovarian cancer for three centres and pseudomyxoma peritonei for three others. The median PCI ranged from 3 to 23. A CC-0/1 resection was obtained in 94.7%. There was no significant difference in the morbidity (p = .25) and mortality (p = .19) rates between different centres. There was a high rate of failure-to-rescue (19.3%) patients with complications and the survival in patients with colorectal PM was inferior. A lack of dedicated personnel for data collection and entry was the main reason for only 10/43 surgeons contributing data. The other problem was the lack of complete electronic medical record systems at all centres., Conclusions: These results validate existing practices and identify country-specific problems that need to be addressed. Despite operational problems, the registry is an invaluable tool for audit and research. It shows the feasibility of fruitful collaboration between surgeons in the absence of any regulatory body or funding for the project.