1. Cost-effectiveness of generic pan-genotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir versus genotype-dependent direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment.
- Author
-
Goel A, Chen Q, Chhatwal J, and Aggarwal R
- Subjects
- Adult, Antiviral Agents adverse effects, Antiviral Agents economics, Carbamates adverse effects, Computer Simulation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Drug Combinations, Drugs, Generic adverse effects, Drugs, Generic economics, Female, Genotype, Hepacivirus genetics, Hepatitis C diagnosis, Hepatitis C virology, Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings adverse effects, Humans, India, Male, Models, Economic, Quality of Life, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Sofosbuvir adverse effects, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Antiviral Agents therapeutic use, Carbamates economics, Carbamates therapeutic use, Drug Costs, Drugs, Generic therapeutic use, Hepacivirus drug effects, Hepatitis C drug therapy, Hepatitis C economics, Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings economics, Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings therapeutic use, Sofosbuvir economics, Sofosbuvir therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background and Aim: Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with low-cost generic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) available in India and other developing countries needs determination of HCV genotype ("genotype-dependent" regimens). Generic velpatasvir, a DAA that obviates the need for genotype determination ("pan-genotypic" regimen), recently became available but is costlier. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of genotype-dependent versus pan-genotypic DAA treatments in India., Methods: A previously validated microsimulation model, adapted to Indian population, was used to compare the costs and long-term outcomes of three scenarios: no treatment, treatment with genotype-dependent regimens, and treatment with pan-genotypic regimen. Input parameters were derived from literature. Using a payer's perspective and lifetime time horizon, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also conducted., Results: At the current price ($US223 for 4 weeks), pan-genotypic regimen was cost-saving compared with no treatment. Compared with genotype-dependent regimens, it increased QALYs by 0.92 and increased costs by $US107 but was deemed cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $US242 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis also supported the cost-effectiveness of pan-genotypic regimen. At the reduced price of $US188 for 4 weeks, the pan-genotypic regimen will become cost-neutral to genotype-dependent regimens (current price: $US100 for 4 weeks)., Conclusions: At current prices, velpatasvir-based pan-genotypic regimen is cost-effective for HCV treatment in India where generic drugs are available. A reduction in the prices of pan-genotypic regimen has the potential to make its use cost-saving while simplifying treatment in community-level programs aimed at HCV elimination., (© 2018 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF