Search

Background: Neonatal acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and leads to worse outcomes. Stratifying neonates into an "at risk" category allows health care providers to objectively recognize opportunities for improvements in quality of care. Methods: The "Neonatal AKI Risk Prediction Scoring" was devised as the "STARZ [Sethi, Tibrewal, Agrawal, Raina, waZir]" Score. The STARZ score was derived from our prior multicentre study analysing risk factors for AKI in neonates admitted to the NICU. This tool includes 10 variables with a total score ranging from 0 to 100 and a cut-off score of 31.5. In the present study, the scoring model has been validated in our multicentre cohort of 744 neonates. Results: In the validation cohort, this scoring model had sensitivity of 82.1%, specificity 91.7%, positive predictive value 81.2%, negative predictive value 92.2% and accuracy 88.8%. Based on the STARZ cut-off score of ≥ 31.5, an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was observed to be 0.932 (95% CI, 0.910–0.954; p < 0.001) signifying that the discriminative power was high. In the validation cohort, the probability of AKI was less than 20% for scores up to 32, 20–40% for scores between 33 and 36, 40–60% for scores between 37 and 43, 60–80% for scores between 44 and 49, and ≥ 80% for scores ≥ 50. Conclusions: To promote the survival of susceptible neonates, early detection and prompt interventional measures based on highly evidenced research is vital. The risk of AKI in admitted neonates can be quantitatively determined by the rapid STARZ scoring system. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Recently, prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapies (PIRRT) have emerged as cost‐effective alternatives to conventional CRRT and their use in the pediatric population has started to become more prominent. However, there is a lack of consensus guidelines on the use of PIRRT in pediatric patients in an intensive care setting. Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar in conjunction with medical librarians from both India and the Cleveland Clinic hospital system to find relevant articles. The Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy workgroup analyzed all articles for relevancy, proposed recommendations, and graded each recommendation for their strength of evidence. Results: Of the 60 studies eligible for review, the workgroup considered data from 37 studies to formulate guidelines for the use of PIRRT in children. The guidelines focused on the definition, indications, machines, and prescription of PIRRT. Conclusion: Although the literature on the use of PIRRT in children is limited, the current studies give credence to their benefits and these expert recommendations are a valuable first step in the continued study of PIRRT in the pediatric population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]