1. Supporting delivery of remote pulmonary rehabilitation across different healthcare contexts: A multi-national study.
- Author
-
Cox NS, Rawlings S, Lannin NA, Candy S, Bhatt SP, Babu AS, and Holland AE
- Subjects
- Humans, United States, India, New Zealand, Telerehabilitation, Female, Male, Attitude of Health Personnel, Health Personnel, Qualitative Research, Focus Groups
- Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to understand factors that health professionals, from a variety of healthcare contexts and countries, believed support remote delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR); and to develop a targeted intervention to support implementation of remote PR. Methods: A 3-phase participatory action-research process was employed, across three study hubs in three countries (NZ, India, USA), representing diverse healthcare delivery contexts. Phase 1 employed focus groups of health professionals working in PR; data were analysed qualitatively with transcripts coded against two implementation frameworks (Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)). Findings informed development of an online toolbox to support delivery of remote PR (Phase 2), which was evaluated using semi-structured interviews (Phase 3). Results: 20 health professionals participated across all study phases. Factors considered to influence implementation of remote PR were consistent across diverse healthcare contexts and related to staffing availability, skills and confidence, and equipment and technology accessibility. An online toolbox provided support for enhancing knowledge and confidence, but was not able to address all implementation barriers. Discussion: Key factors to support clinicians deliver remote PR are common across different healthcare contexts, suggesting broader telerehabilitation implementation strategies may be applicable across healthcare environments., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: NSC, SC, SPB, ASB and AEH were all named collaborators on the funding application which underpinned this work. SPB reports grants and fees unrelated to the present work. For all others, nil to declare.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF