1. A Rules-Based Algorithm to Prioritize Poor Prognosis Cancer Patients in Need of Advance Care Planning.
- Author
-
Bestvina, Christine M., Wroblewski, Kristen E., Daly, Bobby, Beach, Brittany, Chow, Selina, Hantel, Andrew, Malec, Monica, Huber, Michael T., and Polite, Blase N.
- Subjects
- *
ADVERSE health care events , *ALGORITHMS , *CANCER chemotherapy , *CANCER patient psychology , *HOSPITAL care , *HOSPITAL emergency services , *MEDICAL appointments , *MEDICAL needs assessment , *MEDICAL schools , *PALLIATIVE treatment , *TUMORS , *ADVANCE directives (Medical care) , *PROPORTIONAL hazards models , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *ODDS ratio ,TUMOR prognosis - Abstract
Accurate understanding of the prognosis of an advanced cancer patient can lead to decreased aggressive care at the end of life and earlier hospice enrollment.Background: Our goal was to determine the association between high-risk clinical events identified by a simple, rules-based algorithm and decreased overall survival, to target poor prognosis cancer patients who would urgently benefit from advanced care planning.Objective: A retrospective analysis was performed on outpatient oncology patients with an index visit from April 1, 2015, through June 30, 2015. We examined a three-month window for “high-risk events,” defined as (1) change in chemotherapy, (2) emergency department (ED) visit, and (3) hospitalization. Patients were followed until January 31, 2017.Design: A total of 219 patients receiving palliative chemotherapy at the University of Chicago Medicine with a prognosis of ≤12 months were included.Setting/Subjects: The main outcome was overall survival, and each “high-risk event” was treated as a time-varying covariate in a Cox proportional hazards regression model to calculate a hazard ratio (HR) of death.Measurements: A change in chemotherapy regimen, ED visit, hospitalization, and at least one high-risk event occurred in 54% (118/219), 10% (22/219), 26% (57/219), and 67% (146/219) of patients, respectively. The adjusted HR of death for patients with a high-risk event was 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–2.46,Results: p = 0.003), with hospitalization reaching significance (HR 2.74, 95% CI 1.84–4.09,p < 0.001). The rules-based algorithm identified those with the greatest risk of death among a poor prognosis patient group. Implementation of this algorithm in the electronic health record can identify patients with increased urgency to address goals of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]Conclusions: - Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF