Search

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between survival and patterns of clinical management for ovarian carcinoma., Design: Retrospective analysis of cancer registry data including follow-up, operative reports, and pathology reports., Setting: Seventy-seven Illinois hospitals with active cancer registries., Patients: A total of 2669 women with newly diagnosed ovarian carcinoma from 1983 through 1988., Main Outcome Measures: Frequency of use of specific staging procedures and treatment options. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method., Results: Thirty percent of 632 stage I patients, 31% of 233 stage II patients, and 45% of 516 stage III patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, sampled peritoneal washings, and node biopsy. Five-year survival for those receiving this extensive surgery (who were therefore pathologically staged) was as follows: stage I, 80%; stage II, 63%; and stage III, 28%. For those not receiving this extensive surgery (who were therefore clinically staged), the 5-year survival at these stages was 76%, 62%, and 21%, respectively. The overall survival curves were not significantly different between those who were pathologically staged and those who were clinically staged for stage I patients (P = .27) or stage II patients (P = .47), but were for stage III patients (P = .01). Platinum-based combination chemotherapy was given to 76% of 221 patients with pathological stage III disease. Their 5-year survival--50% for the group with no residual disease and 20% for the group with residual disease--was better than for those receiving regimens without platinum--37% and 5%, respectively, for the two groups--and the overall survival curves were significantly better for those receiving platinum (P < .0005 for both groups). The groups receiving platinum had younger patients., Conclusions: Extensive surgery for pathological staging was not usually done for management of ovarian cancer, while platinum-based chemotherapy was commonly used. Failure to undergo extensive surgery had little impact on survival for stage I and II patients. However, use of extensive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy improved survival for stage III patients. The improved survival for this group receiving platinum-based chemotherapy may be explained in part by selection of younger patients for this treatment.

Objective: To determine the degree of compliance with clinical standards among hospitals for care of breast cancer patients and account for variations in compliance., Design: Analysis of cancer registry data submitted to the American Cancer Society, Illinois Division, Chicago, for a concurrent prospective descriptive study of breast cancer, supplemented by other hospital data from public sources., Setting: Ninety-nine Illinois hospitals evenly distributed among rural counties, counties with small cities outside the Chicago metropolitan area, exurban counties in the Chicago metropolitan area, suburban Cook County, and urban Chicago., Patients: A total of 5766 newly diagnosed patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer in 1988, representing 84% of the estimated 6900 new cases in the state for that year., Main Outcome Measures: Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analyses of five dependent quality variables from clinical indicators related to early diagnosis, hormone receptor determination, adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy, and axillary lymph node dissection., Results: At the hospitals studied, (1) late stage (IIb through IV) at diagnosis was associated with urban location, higher proportion of poorly insured patients, fewer breast cancer cases treated, and lower oncology charges (proportion of variance explained, R2 = .50, P less than .00001); (2) omission of hormone receptor test for stages II through IV was associated with urban location and higher proportion of poorly insured patients (R2 = .18, P less than .00003); and (3) omission of indicated radiation therapy was associated with urban location and fewer breast cancer cases (R2 = .21, P less than .00001). Omission of adjuvant therapy and omission of axillary lymph node dissection were not significantly associated with any of the hospital variables examined., Conclusions: The findings suggest that there is a group of urban hospitals, generally small and marginally reimbursed, where comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are not obtained.

A retrospective study of survival results for pancreatic cancer was performed. The study had two objectives: 1) to relate the extent of disease and management to survival, and 2) to determine whether newer treatment combinations have altered prognosis. Cancer registrars from 88 Illinois hospitals reviewed original medical records and submitted standardized report forms on 2,401 patients diagnosed between 1978-84. Three-year survival time was longer after laparotomy/bypass plus radiation/chemotherapy than for laparotomy/bypass alone (P less than .02). But the difference in survival between resection versus resection, radiation, and chemotherapy was not significant (P = .16). After resection, the median survival for 78 Stage I patients was 12.5 months, whereas for 181 Stage I patients after laparotomy/bypass it was 6.8 months (P less than .00001). For patients without metastases, 3-year survival was significantly better for 249 patients in whom cancer was resected versus 568 unresected patients (P less than .001). Survival was longer for 568 unresected patients without gross metastases than for 954 patients with metastatic disease found at laparotomy (P less than .05). From this study the authors concluded that: 1) since 3-year survival results were higher than expected after resection for localized cancers, resection is still desirable when it can be done with acceptable complication risks, and 2) the use of multiple treatment modalities for pancreatic cancer warrants further study in organized trials.