Search

Background: Recent genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer (CRC) have identified common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mapping to 10 independent loci that confer modest increased risk. These studies have been conducted in European populations and it is unclear whether these observations generalise to populations with different ethnicities and rates of CRC., Methods: An association study was performed on 892 CRC cases and 890 controls recruited from the Hong Kong Chinese population, genotyping 32 SNPs, which were either associated with CRC in previous studies or are in close proximity to previously reported risk SNPs., Results: Twelve of the SNPs showed evidence of an association. The strongest associations were provided by rs10795668 on 10p14, rs4779584 on 15q14 and rs12953717 on 18q21.2. There was significant linear association between CRC risk and the number of independent risk variants possessed by an individual (P=2.29 × 10(-5))., Conclusion: These results indicate that some previously reported SNP associations also impact on CRC risk in the Chinese population. Possible reasons for failure of replication for some loci include inadequate study power, differences in allele frequency, linkage disequilibrium structure or effect size between populations. Our results suggest that many associations for CRC are likely to generalise across populations.

Because acute myocardial infarction causes significant morbidity and mortality, a correct diagnosis in the accident and emergency department is important so that early treatment including thrombolytic therapy can be given. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reasons for missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the accident and emergency department, and the implications. All patients admitted to our coronary care unit in 1995 with the confirmed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction were analysed retrospectively. The demographic data, clinical profiles, diagnosis made at the accident and emergency department and feasibility of thrombolytic therapy were assessed. Analysis of the electrocardiography by the accident and emergency department doctor and the coronary care unit doctor were also compared. Forty-three out of 159 patients (27.0%) with acute myocardial infarction were missed in the accident and emergency department. The diagnoses made were mostly angina or chest pain. Absence of chest pain (25.6%) [vs. 10.2% in correct diagnosis group, p < 0.05] and lack of ST elevation in electrocardiograph (62.8%) [vs. 18.1% in correct diagnosis group, p < 0.0001] were the main predisposing factors for missed diagnosis. Because of missed diagnosis, only 25.6% (vs. 67.2% in correct diagnosis group, p < 0.01) of patients were admitted to the coronary care unit. About one-third (34.9%) of missed diagnosis patients (vs. 6.0% in correct diagnosis, p < 0.01) did not receive thrombolytic therapy because of delayed diagnosis. In the missed diagnosis group, 34.8% of them might be avoidable, if electrocardiogram interpretation was more accurate. More education and training of the involved medical personnel might improve the overall situation.