Search

A substantial proportion of Hong Kong's aging population suffers from osteoarthritis in both knees. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) is a surgical option for addressing this condition and can be performed via two approaches: simultaneous BTKA (SimBTKA) and staged BTKA (StaBTKA). We compared the cost-effectiveness and safety of these two methods in our institution. We retrospectively reviewed 2,372 patients (SimBTKA, 772; StaBTKA, 1,600; females, 1,780; males, 592; mean age at SimBTKA, 70.4 ± 7.99 years; mean age at StaBTKA, 66.4 ± 7.50 years; p  < 0.001) who underwent BTKA in our institution from 2001 to 2022. Patients were categorized according to the surgical approach. Patients undergoing BTKA in our institution were included. Particularly for SimBTKA, patients were assessed by anesthetists to be medically fit before undergoing the procedure according to their age, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and osteoarthritis severity. The primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS) after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the 30-day unintended readmission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. SimBTKA had a shorter mean total LOS (acute hospital + rehabilitation center; SimBTKA, 13.09 days; StaBTKA, 18.12 days; p  < 0.001) and mean LOS in acute hospital (SimBTKA, 7.70 days; StaBTKA, 10.42 days; p  < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in the mean LOS in rehabilitation centers (SimBTKA, 5.47 days; StaBTKA, 6.32 days; p  > 0.05) between the two approaches. The 30-day unintended readmission rate was lower in SimBTKA (SimBTKA, 2.07%; StaBTKA, 3.30%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.60; p  > 0.05) but statistically insignificant. SimBTKA was less costly than StaBTKA by US$ 8,422.22 per patient. No significant differences in ICU admission and death rates were found ( p  > 0.05) between the two groups. SimBTKA had a shorter LOS and lower cost than StaBTKA and comparable complication rates. Therefore, SimBTKA should be indicated in medically stable patients., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a growing problem in an aging population. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) have been used for management of isolated OA of the medial tibiofemoral joint. This is the first study on the usage of UKA in Hong Kong., Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing medial compartment UKA in a tertiary referral center since 2003. Preoperative and postoperative International Knee Society Knee Scores (KSKS) and Knee Societal Functional Assessment (KSFA) scores, range of motion, flexion deformity, and lower limb mechanical alignment were measured. Statistical analysis using paired sample t-tests was performed. Revision operations, rate of revisions, and causes of failure were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors for revision operation were performed against patient demographics, type of prosthesis, postoperative alignment, and degree of correction., Results: There were 94 UKA performed with an average follow-up of 4.3 years (range: 0.5-15.2 years). The KSKS and KSFA scores improved from 54.5 and 54.0 to 85.6 and 64.5 ( p < 0.01), respectively. There was no significant improvement in the range of motion ( p = 0.87) and fixed flexion deformity ( p = 0.14). Mechanical alignment improved from 172.1° to 174.9° varus postoperatively ( p < 0.01). Six cases required revision operation with a revision rate of 1.50 per 100 observed component years. Causes of revision included two cases of tibial tray loosening and one case each of progressive OA, mechanical failure, persistent pain, and infection. Logistic regression analysis for risk factors showed no statistical significance., Conclusions: UKA offers good functional improvement but further long-term studies are required to evaluate survivorship.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of various orthotic treatments for patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis., Design: Prospective cohort study with sequential interventions., Setting: University-affiliated hospital, Hong Kong., Patients: From December 2010 to November 2011, 10 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were referred by orthopaedic surgeons for orthotic treatment. All patients were sequentially treated with flat insole, lateral-wedged insole, lateral-wedged insole with subtalar strap, lateral-wedged insole with arch support, valgus knee brace, and valgus knee brace with lateral-wedged insole with arch support for 4 weeks with no treatment break. Three-dimensional gait analysis and questionnaires were completed after each orthotic treatment., Main Outcome Measures: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale scores, and peak and mean knee adduction moments., Results: Compared with pretreatment, the lateral-wedged insole, lateral-wedged insole with arch support, and valgus knee brace groups demonstrated significant reductions in WOMAC pain score (19.1%, P=0.04; 18.2%, P=0.04; and 20.4%, P=0.02, respectively). The lateral-wedged insole with arch support group showed the greatest reduction in visual analogue scale score compared with pretreatment at 24.1% (P=0.004). Addition of a subtalar strap to lateral-wedged insoles (lateral-wedged insole with subtalar strap) did not produce significant benefit when compared with the lateral-wedged insole alone. The valgus knee brace with lateral-wedged insole with arch support group demonstrated an additive effect with a statistically significant reduction in WOMAC total score (-26.7%, P=0.01). Compliance with treatment for the isolated insole groups were all over 90%, but compliance for the valgus knee brace-associated groups was only around 50%. Gait analysis indicated statistically significant reductions in peak and mean knee adduction moments in all orthotic groups when compared with a flat insole., Conclusions: These results support the use of orthotic treatment for early medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.