Search

Background: Current practice of adding concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy to radiotherapy (CRT) for treating advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is based on the Intergroup-0099 Study published in 1998. However, the outcome for the radiotherapy-alone (RT) group in that trial was substantially poorer than those in other trials, and there were no data on late toxicities. Verification of the long-term therapeutic index of this regimen is needed., Methods: Patients with nonkeratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma staged T1-4N2-3M0 were randomly assigned to RT (176 patients) or to CRT (172 patients) using cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks for three cycles in concurrence with radiotherapy, followed by cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) plus fluorouracil (1000 mg per m(2) per day for 4 days) every 4 weeks for three cycles. Primary endpoints included overall failure-free rate (FFR) (the time to first failure at any site) and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, locoregional FFR, distant FFR, and acute and late toxicity rates. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: The two treatment groups were well balanced in all patient characteristics, tumor factors, and radiotherapy parameters. Adding chemotherapy statistically significantly improved the 5-year FFR (CRT vs RT: 67% vs 55%; P = .014) and 5-year progression-free survival (CRT vs RT: 62% vs 53%; P = .035). Cumulative incidence of acute toxicity increased with chemotherapy by 30% (CRT vs RT: 83% vs 53%; P < .001), but the 5-year late toxicity rate did not increase statistically significantly (CRT vs RT: 30% vs 24%; P = .30). Deaths because of disease progression were reduced statistically significantly by 14% (CRT vs RT: 38% vs 24%; P = .008), but 5-year overall survival was similar (CRT vs RT: 68% vs 64%; P = .22; hazard ratio of CRT = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.58 to 1.13) because deaths due to toxicity or incidental causes increased by 7% (CRT vs RT: 1.7% vs 0, and 8.1% vs 3.4%, respectively; P = .015)., Conclusions: Adding concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy statistically significantly reduced failure and cancer-specific deaths when compared with radiotherapy alone. Although there was no statistically significant increase in major late toxicity, increase in noncancer deaths narrowed the resultant gain in overall survival.

Background: The BRCA1 gene is an important breast-cancer susceptibility gene. Promoter polymorphisms can alter the binding affinity of transcription factors, changing transcriptional activity and may affect susceptibility to disease., Methods and Results: Using direct sequencing of the BRCA1 promoter region, we identified four polymorphisms c.-2804T-->C (rs799908:T-->C), c.-2265C-->T (rs11655505:C-->T), c.-2004A-->G (rs799906:A-->G) and c.-1896(ACA)(1)-->(ACA)(2) (rs8176071:(ACA)(1)-->(ACA)(2)) present in Hong Kong Chinese. Each polymorphism was studied independently and in combination by functional assays. Although all four variants significantly altered promoter activity, the c.-2265T allele had stronger binding than the C allele, and the most common mutant haplotype, which contains the c.-2265T allele, increased promoter activity by 70%. Risk association first tested in Hong Kong Chinese women with breast cancer and age-matched controls and replicated in a large population-based study of Shanghai Chinese, together totalling >3000 participants, showed that carriers of the c.-2265T allele had a reduced risk for breast cancer (combined odd ratio (OR) = 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.93; p = 0.003) which was more evident among women aged >or=45 years at first diagnosis of breast cancer and without a family history of breast cancer (combined OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.91; p = 0.004). The most common haplotype containing the c.-2265T allele also showed significant risk association for women aged >or=45 years without a family history of breast cancer (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.89; p = 0.008)., Conclusion: This comprehensive study of BRCA1 promoter polymorphisms found four variants that altered promoter activity and with the most significant contribution from c.-2265C-->T, which could affect susceptibility to breast cancer in the Chinese population. Its significance in other populations remains to be investigated.

Background: The purpose of this article is to report the overall survival (OS) outcome of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with local failure who received salvage treatment and to identify prognostic factors for OS., Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2000, 2915 patients received primary radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy for nonmetastatic NPC. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 319 patients had developed local failure as the first failure, with or without synchronous regional/distant failure. OS was calculated from the start of primary RT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for OS in patients with isolated local failure., Results: The T classification distribution of the local failure (rT classification) was as follows: 68 (21%) rT1 to T2a, 92 (29%) rT2b, 82 (26%) rT3, and 77 (24%) rT4. The rT classification was the same as the initial T classification in 82% of patients. Two hundred seventy-five patients (86%) had isolated local failure, and 232 (84%) of them did not have any distant metastasis or regional failure develop during follow-up. Salvage treatment was given to 200 patients (73%) with isolated local failure. One hundred fifty-nine patients (80%) received reirradiation (108 external beam RT [EBRT], 44 brachytherapy, and seven EBRT plus brachytherapy), 22 patients (11%) underwent nasopharyngectomy with or without postoperative RT, and 19 patients (9%) were treated with chemotherapy alone. Four patients died of RT complications, and one died of chemotherapy toxicity in the absence of active NPC. The 3-year actuarial OS for patients with isolated local failure was 74%. On multivariate analysis, advanced initial T classification (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; p = .0006) and the use of salvage treatment (HR, 0.54; p = .0038) were independent prognostic factors. For the subgroups of patients who had the same recurrent and initial T classification, salvage treatment was associated with improved OS only in the subgroup with T1 to T2 local failure (n = 127; p = 0.0446), but not in the subgroups with T3 (n = 48) or T4 (n = 54) disease., Conclusions: Most patients with first local failure have localized disease. Salvage treatment is feasible in most of the patients with clinically isolated local failure. Patients who had early initial T classification have a more favorable prognosis. Subgroup analysis suggests that salvage treatment only prolongs survival in patients with T1 to T2 recurrent disease., (2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Breast conservation therapy is an established procedure for treating invasive breast cancer. However, little has been reported in the literature about its applicability in the Chinese. This study was done to find out the local recurrence and mortality rates of such therapy among Hong Kong Chinese women. In addition, the prognostic factors were also examined., Methods: A retrospective study reviewing clinical records of breast cancer patients treated between February 1986 and September 1994 was undertaken., Results: Sixty-four female patients were identified. The follow-up period ranged from 8 to 90 months with a median of 46 months. The median age at diagnosis was 51 years and 50% of patients were postmenopausal. The median tumour size was 2.5 cm and 20 patients had involved axillary lymph nodes. Ten (16%) patients developed ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and seven underwent salvage mastectomy. Lymphovascular permeation by tumour cells was the only factor significantly associated with recurrence. Five (8%) eventually died; the 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 42% and 83%, respectively. Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence correlated with a higher mortality rate whereas adjuvant treatment with either chemotherapy or tamoxifen improved the outcome., Conclusions: Breast conservation therapy is an acceptable alternative in the treatment of breast cancer in Chinese patients.

1. We report a single-blind randomized crossover trial comparing the efficacy of tropisetron plus dexamethasone (TROPDEX) vs conventional combination of metoclopramide, dexamethasone and diphenhydramine (METDEX) in prevention of acute and delayed vomiting in Chinese patients receiving high dose cisplatin. 2. Thirty-six consecutive patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were entered into the study, all received cisplatin at a dose range of 60-100 mg/m2. Patients were randomized in the sequence of antiemetic regimens used in two consecutive cycles. 3. The TROPDEX regimen consisting of tropisetron 5 mg i.v. and dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. given on day 1 of chemotherapy, followed by oral maintenance with tropisetron 5 mg daily and dexamethasone 4 mg twice daily from day 2 to 6. The METDEX regimen consisting of metoclopramide 1 mg kg-1 i.v., dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. and diphenhydramine 25 mg i.v. given before chemotherapy and then 2 hourly for two more doses on day 1, followed by oral metoclopramide 20 mg 6 hourly from day 2 to 6. 4. Complete control of acute vomiting was observed in 64% of patients with TROPDEX as compared with 14% with METDEX (P < 0.01). While complete plus major control of acute vomiting was observed in 84% with TROPDEX as compared with 58% with METDEX. The mean vomiting episodes on day 1 were 1.4 with TROPDEX as compared with 3.5 with METDEX (P < 0.01). There was, however, no significant difference between the two regimens in the control of delayed vomiting. 5. When patients randomized to TROPDEX in the second cycle were compared with those with TROPDEX in the first cycle, the antiemetic efficacy was reduced, with mean acute vomiting episodes of 2 in the former compared with 0.8 in the latter (P < 0.01). 6. The most common adverse effect observed was headache in TROPDEX (27%) and dizziness in METDEX (40%). 7. In conclusion, the antiemetic regimen TROPDEX is effective in Chinese patients receiving high dose cisplatin chemotherapy and is well tolerated. It is better than conventional METDEX regimen in the control of acute vomiting, but not in the control of delayed vomiting.

A good coverage by the Hong Kong Cancer Registry of cases of the common cancers diagnosed in Hong Kong during 1974-78 is indicated by an excess of cases over deaths registered, which is according to expectation from survival prospects. The trends during 1961-79 showed a rapid increase in mortality from lung cancer in both sexes, a moderate rise in liver cancer in males, and small increases in esophageal cancer in males and colon cancer in females. Cervical cancer was the only neoplasm that showed a decreasing trend, although this was small in proportion. Some epidemiological observations on cancer arising in the lung, liver, larynx, and nasopharynx are presented.