Search

The state of Hawaii has had near-universal health insurance coverage for the last 20 years. Its highly diverse population offers the opportunity for a unique, natural experiment in the United States on the examination of social differences in health care utilisation when financial barriers are removed. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine predictors of prenatal care utilisation patterns in the four major ethnic groups in Hawaii. The data used in this study are the 1979-92 Hawaii livebirth vital record files. A total of 165,301 singleton livebirths to Hawaii-resident mothers of Caucasian, native Hawaiian, Japanese or Filipino ancestry were selected. Despite near-universal health care coverage in Hawaii, a surprising number of women did not adequately utilise prenatal care, with large differences between groups. Multivariate analyses indicated that similar maternal socio-demographic factors were associated with prenatal care use in each ethnic group. Social variation continues to exist among all ethnic groups even in the presence of universal access to care. These data emphasise the need to address the distinct cultural needs of populations for providing health services, and further challenge the assumption that removal of financial barriers will ensure a high level of prenatal care use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the association between maternal sociodemographic characteristics and the receipt of different levels of prenatal care use (no care, inadequate, intermediate, adequate) in order to determine different patterns in the relationships between maternal characteristics and these distinct categories of prenatal care use. Using the 1979-1992 Hawaii live birth vital record file, single live births to Hawaii resident mothers of white, Hawaiian/part-Hawaiian, Filipino, or Japanese ethnicity, who did not indicate on the birth certificate that either parent was active duty military, were selected. Over one quarter of this study population did not initiate prenatal care in the first trimester. Given the high level of insurance coverage found in Hawaii, this finding is disconcerting, particularly in relation to the U.S. Year 2000 Objective of 90% initiation in the first trimester. Overall, the factors that predicted receipt of any prenatal care predicted more adequate use of prenatal care as well. Noteworthy exceptions were maternal age and ethnicity. Identifying these exceptions is important for the development of a more detailed understanding of risk factors related to use of prenatal care to better target program responses aimed at improving prenatal care use. In addition, these data suggest that removing financial barriers to access to care does not guarantee universal use of disease prevention and health promotion services.

This study compares the maternal sociodemographic and prenatal care characteristics and birth outcomes of US resident white and Japanese-American mothers, using data from the state of Hawaii. The specific focus is to determine to what extent these factors can explain variations in newborn maturity and mortality indicators. Single livebirths to resident, non-military dependent white and Japanese-American mothers were selected for analysis from the 1979-1990 linked livebirth-infant death files from Hawaii. Compared with white mothers, Japanese-American mothers were significantly more likely to be married, age 18 years and older, have higher educational attainment, and have adequate prenatal care utilisation. The majority of Japanese-American mothers were born in Hawaii, while the majority of white mothers were born on the US mainland. The mean birthweight of Japanese-American infants was 200 g lighter than that of white infants. Infant mortality rates (IMRs) for both groups were below the US Year 2000 Health Objective. After controlling for maternal sociodemographic and prenatal care factors with logistic regression, Japanese-American infants had significantly higher risks of low birthweight, preterm and very preterm birth and of being small-for-gestational age. These findings indicate that populations with preferential maternal sociodemographic and prenatal care risk indicators may still exhibit higher low birthweight percentages, but achieve comparatively low IMRs.