Search

Purpose: Tectonic keratoplasties (TK) are used to treat corneal and scleral perforations and to prevent the loss of the eye. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed indications, surgical procedures, and outcomes of eccentric mini and corneo-scleral tectonic keratoplasties with respect to anatomical survival and clear graft survival rates to identify risk factors for graft failure. Methods: This retrospective study includes 33 eccentric mini (graft diameter <6 mm) and/or corneo-scleral TK of 32 consecutive patients of a total of 41 TK carried out between 2005 and 2020 in the Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Germany, making up 0.7% of all keratoplasties performed during this period (n = 5557). Patient and graft specific data were extracted from medical files. Anatomical survival—defined as achieving integrity of the globe without further surgical interventions—and clear graft survival—defined as persisting graft clarity—were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We also fitted Cox proportional hazard models to account for factors influencing anatomical and clear graft survival. Results: Median duration of anatomical success was 72.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.1—infinite (inf.)) and median duration of clear graft survival was 29.6 months (95% CI 12.5-Inf.). The 1-year survival rate for anatomical survival was 67.6% (95% CI 52.2% - 87.6%) and for clear graft survival 66.4% (95% CI 50.5%– 87.1%). No enucleation was necessary during this time-period. Non-inflammatory primary causes (n = 14) presented a trend towards better anatomical survival rates (median remained above 0.75 during follow-up) compared to inflammatory primary causes (n = 19, median 18.1 months (95% CI 2.8 - inf.)) and longer clear graft survival (median 29.6 months (95% CI 12.5 - inf.) versus 13.1 months (95% CI 3.2 - inf.)). Corneo-scleral grafts (n = 18) compared to corneal grafts (n = 15) showed a trend towards better anatomical survival (more than 50% of eyes did not fail during follow-up period (95% CI 21.9-Inf. months) versus 18.1 months (95% CI 2.4-Inf.)) and clear graft survival (median 29.6 months (95% CI 12.6-Inf.) versus 6.2 months (95% CI 2.8-Inf.)). Old age (n = 11, 75.2 – 90.1 years) compared to young age (n = 11, 6.2 – 60.2 years) was the only hazard ratio (hazard ratio 0.04 (95% CI 0.002–0.8)) that reached the level of significance (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Eccentric TK is helpful in the successful treatment of a variety of severe eye diseases. Patients at young age, with pre-existing inflammatory conditions or corneal TK are at higher risk for anatomical failure as well as clear graft failure and therefore need to be monitored closely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Healthcare work is a risk factor for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)., Objectives: To review risk mitigation strategies in ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic., Material and Methods: Risk mitigation strategies to maintain ophthalmology care, to prevent collateral damage from care disruption, and to prevent the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are summarized based on the example of a tertiary referral center in Germany., Results: Clinical management strategies included restricted access to buildings, triage systems, telemedicine approaches, strategies for rapid treat and release, and transparent communication strategies. Strategies to protect patients and staff relied on both standard hygiene precautions and the use of personal protective equipment for prevention of droplet infections. Physical barriers supported risk mitigation strategies., Conclusion: To maintain ophthalmological care during the COVID-19 pandemic, a coordinated, multifaceted approach using risk mitigation strategies to protect staff, patients, and the public was initiated.