Search

Both tobacco cessation and low-dose CT screening in at-risk individuals reduce lung cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. As part of a national screening program for the early detection of lung cancer, smoking cessation must be a mandatory part of the counseling given to participants. This increases the cost-benefit effectiveness of the screening program. As part of the initial consultation evidence-based measures for smoking cessation must be offered to smoking participants of the screening program in form of a minimal intervention. If participants do not want to participate in a quit smoking measure they must actively refuse (opt-out rule). The costs of quitting smoking, including the costs of withdrawal-inhibiting medication, have to be fully covered by statutory health insurance for participants in the lung cancer screening program., Competing Interests: Alexander Rupp ist Berater der Firma Sanero Medical GmbH Stuttgart, die eine Internetplattform und eine digitale Gesundheitsanwendung (DiGA) zur Tabakentwöhnung betreibt.Christa Rustler ist Leiterin des Büros des Deutschen Netz rauchfreier Krankenhäuser und Gesundheitseinrichtungen (DNRfK), welches zur Implementierung des „rauchfrei tickets“ Zuwendungen der Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA) erhält.Die anderen Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction:  The ambulantization of patient care that were previously provided as inpatient service is one of the goals of the current reform in the German healthcare system. In pulmonology, this particularly applies to endoscopic procedures. However, the real costs of endoscopic services, which form the basis for the calculation of a future so called hybrid DRG or in the AOP catalog, are unclear., Methods:  After selection of use cases including endoscopic procedures which can be performed on an outpatient basis by a committee of experts the appropriate DRGs were identified from the § 21-KHEntgG data for 2022 published by the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK). The costs were calculated from the respective InEK cost matrix added by the calculated material costs., Results:  The use cases suitable for outpatient treatment were systematic endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) with transbronchial needle aspiration (calculated costs € 2,175.60 without or € 3,315.60 including PET/CT), navigation-assisted bronchoscopy for peripheral lesions (depending on the methodology € 2,870.23 to €4,120.23) and diagnostic (flexible) bronchoscopy (€ 1,121.02)., Conclusion:  Outpatient treatment of endoscopic procedures that were previously performed inpatient is possible and necessary, and the costs calculated in this publication can form a reliable basis for appropriate reimbursement. Together with a structural quality that has been transformed to outpatient service and cross-sector cooperation, continued high-quality care for pneumological patients can be ensured., Competing Interests: Keiner der Autoren erklärte einen Interessenkonflikt. Die inspiring-health GmbH (M. Rathmayer, M. Tiefgraber, M. Wilke) hat als Berater für die Moderation der Arbeitsgruppensitzungen und die Durchführung der Kostenkalkulationen ein Beratungshonorar von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin e. V. erhalten., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Based on the assessment of new evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its guidelines for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in December 2022. The new recommendations and the latest study data made it necessary to update the existing guideline on the treatment of at least rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) for the German-speaking countries, replacing the respective chapters of the treatment guidelines published in 2022. A shortened treatment of proven RR-TB and multidrug-resistant TB for at least 6 months using the fixed and non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) is now also recommended for Austria, Germany, and Switzerland under certain conditions considering the existing barriers for the implementation of the new treatment regimen. For the treatment of pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR-) TB, an individualized treatment for 18 months continues to be the primary recommendation. The non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) may be used alternatively in selected pre-XDR-TB cases, provided that all prerequisites are met. The necessary requirements for using BPaLM and BPaL are presented in detail in this amendment to the consensus-based TB treatment guideline for adult patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

In December 2022, based on the assessment of new evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its guidelines for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). The evaluation of both, these recommendations, and the latest study data, makes it necessary to update the existing guidelines on the treatment of at least rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis for the German-speaking region, hereby replacing the respective chapters. A shortened MDR-TB treatment of at least 6 month using the fixed and non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) is now also recommended for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland under certain conditions. This recommendation applies to TB cases with proven rifampicin resistance, including rifampicin monoresistance. For treatment of pre-extensively drug resistant TB (pre-XDR-TB), an individualized treatment for 18 months adjusted to resistance data continues to be the primary recommendation. The non-modifiable drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) may be used alternatively in pre-XDR TB if all prerequisites are met. The necessary prerequisites for the use of BPaLM and BPaL are presented in this amendment to the S2k guideline for 'Tuberculosis in adulthood'., Competing Interests: Informationen zu Interessenkonflikten finden Sie auf den Seiten der AWMF (http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/awmf-regelwerk.html)., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The aim of contact tracing for tuberculosis is in addition to active case finding the detection of chains of infection and the prevention of the further spread of the disease. In this context, a careful selection of contact persons is necessary, depending on the type and duration of contact, to identify persons who are recently infected and therefore to increase the benefit of a preventive therapy and to avoid unnecessary testing of persons who are not at risk of infection. Since the last update of the recommendations on contact tracing, data on the use of interferon-y release assays (IGRAs) in children has been improved markedly. These are the preferred test in contact tracing of adults. For children, both IGRAs and the tuberculin skin test can be used equivalently. Rifampicin for 4 months, rifampicin and isoniazid for 3 months, or isoniazid for 9 months are recommended as preventive therapy in cases of confirmed infection.The implementation of the contact tracing in different age groups as well as legal framework conditions and socio-medical aspects and challenges are dealt with in detail. In addition, special cases, such as environmental screening in day-care centers, schools, or other community facilities, are discussed separately., Competing Interests: R. D. erhielt Honorare und/oder Reisekostenunterstützung für Vorträge bei Veranstaltungen, die von Hain Lifescience, Insmed, Mikrogen, Oxford Immunotec oder Qiagen gesponsert wurden. Alle weiteren Autorinnen und Autoren haben keine potenziellen COI angegeben., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

In Germany tuberculosis is a rare disease and usually well treatable. Worldwide it is one of the most common infectious diseases with approximately 10 million new cases every year. Even with low incidences in Germany, tuberculosis is an important differential diagnosis especially due to international developments and migration movements. With a decreasing experience there's a continuous demand on accurate and up-to-date information. This guideline covers all aspects of microbiological diagnostics, basic principles of standard therapy, treatment of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, management of side effects, special features of diagnosis and treatment of resistant tuberculosis, and treatment in TB-HIV coinfection. Also, it explains when treatment in specialized centers is required, aspects of care and legal regulations and the diagnosis and preventive therapy of latent tuberculosis infection. The update of the S2k guideline "Tuberculosis in Adults" is intended to serve as a guideline for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of tuberculosis for all those involved in tuberculosis care and to help meet the current challenges in dealing with tuberculosis in Germany., Competing Interests: Eine Übersicht der Interessenkonflikte findet sich im Internet unter http://awmf.org; AWMF-Registriernummer 020-019, (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The majority of research within lung cancer is focused on prevention, diagnosis and treatment rather than examining infrastructure or processes of lung cancer centres. Benchmarking is a systematic method for documenting and comparing processes, functions or performance of organisations against the best in the world. ADVANCE-1 is a European Respiratory Society funded pilot study with the main aim of creating a benchmarking tool that can easily document and reflect the structure and process within a lung cancer centre and its associated registry. By doing this we can then compare centres and generate best practice learning points from each centre in order to learn from each other. The ADVANCE-1 study group was constituted by two ERS fellowship-holders and senior lung cancer specialists from the two participating lung cancer services in Glasgow, Scotland, and Berlin, Germany. The study design and benchmarking tools were reviewed externally. Once the benchmarking tools were created, prospective testing was undertaken in the two participating centres in order to allow comparison to ascertain best practice in a so called 'collaborative benchmarking approach'. We were then able to create personalised learning points for each centre. The next phase of the project will be to expand the benchmarking across several European centres in the ADANCE-2 project., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In Germany the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic situation is unique among large European countries in that incidence and case fatality rate are distinctly lower. We describe the clinical course and examine factors associated with outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Germany., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study we included patients with COVID-19 admitted to a national network of German hospitals between February 12 and June 12, 2020. We examined demographic characteristics, comorbidities and clinical outcomes., Results: We included 1904 patients with a median age of 73 years, 48.5% (924/1904) of whom were female. The mortality rate was 17% (317/1835; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 16-19), the rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) was 21% (399/1860; 95%CI 20-23), and the rate of invasive mechanical ventilation was 14% (250/1850: 95%CI 12-15). The most prominent risk factors for death were male sex (hazard ratio (HR) 1.45; 95%CI 1.15-1.83), pre-existing lung disease (HR 1.61; 95%CI 1.20-2.16), and increased patient age (HR 4.11 (95%CI 2.57-6.58) for age >79 years versus <60 years). Among patients admitted to the ICU, the mortality rate was 29% (109/374; 95%CI 25-34) and higher in ventilated (33% [77/235; 95%CI 27-39]) than in non-ventilated ICU patients (23%, 32/139; 95%CI 16-30; p < 0.05)., Conclusions: In this nationwide series of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Germany, in-hospital and ICU mortality rates were substantial. The most prominent risk factors for death were male sex, pre-existing lung disease, and greater patient age., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Against the background of the pandemic caused by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the German Respiratory Society has appointed experts to develop therapy strategies for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Here we present key position statements including observations about the pathophysiology of (ARF). In terms of the pathophysiology of pulmonary infection with SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 can be divided into 3 phases. Pulmonary damage in advanced COVID-19 often differs from the known changes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Two types (type L and type H) are differentiated, corresponding to early- and late-stage lung damage. This differentiation should be taken into consideration in the respiratory support of ARF. The assessment of the extent of ARF should be based on arterial or capillary blood gas analysis under room air conditions, and it needs to include the calculation of oxygen supply (measured from the variables of oxygen saturation, hemoglobin level, the corrected values of Hüfner's factor, and cardiac output). Aerosols can cause transmission of infectious, virus-laden particles. Open systems or vented systems can increase the release of respirable particles. Procedures in which the invasive ventilation system must be opened and endotracheal intubation carried out are associated with an increased risk of infection. Personal protective equipment (PPE) should have top priority because fear of contagion should not be a primary reason for intubation. Based on the current knowledge, inhalation therapy, nasal high-flow therapy (NHF), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be performed without an increased risk of infection to staff if PPE is provided. A significant proportion of patients with ARF present with relevant hypoxemia, which often cannot be fully corrected, even with a high inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) under NHF. In this situation, the oxygen therapy can be escalated to CPAP or NIV when the criteria for endotracheal intubation are not met. In ARF, NIV should be carried out in an intensive care unit or a comparable setting by experienced staff. Under CPAP/NIV, a patient can deteriorate rapidly. For this reason, continuous monitoring and readiness for intubation are to be ensured at all times. If the ARF progresses under CPAP/NIV, intubation should be implemented without delay in patients who do not have a "do not intubate" order., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Since 2015 a significant increase in tuberculosis cases is notified in Germany, mostly due to rising numbers of migrants connected to the recent refugee crisis. Because of the low incidence in previous years, knowledge on tuberculosis is more and more limited to specialized centers. However, lung specialist and healthcare workers of other fields have contact to an increasing number of tuberculosis patients. In this situation, guidance for the management of standard therapy and especially for uncommon situations will be essential. This new guideline on tuberculosis in adults gives recommendations on diagnosis, treatment, prevention and prophylaxis. It provides a comprehensive overview over the current knowledge, adapted to the specific situation in Germany. The German Central Committee against Tuberculosis (DZK e. V.) realized this guideline on behalf of the German Respiratory Society (DGP). A specific guideline for tuberculosis in the pediatrics field will be published separately. Compared to the former recommendations of the year 2012, microbiological diagnostics and therapeutic drug management were given own sections. Chapters about the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, tuberculosis in people living with HIV and pharmacological management were extended. This revised guideline aims to be a useful tool for practitioners and other health care providers to deal with the recent challenges of tuberculosis treatment in Germany., Competing Interests: Interessenkonflikt: Siehe Interessenkonflikterklärung auf www.awmf.org, (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a deadly cancer mainly caused by previous exposure to asbestos. With a latency period up to 50 years the incidence of MM is still increasing, even in countries that banned asbestos. Secondary prevention has been established to provide persons at risk regular health examinations. An earlier detection with tumor markers might improve therapeutic options. Previously, we have developed a new blood-based assay for the protein marker calretinin. Aim of this study was the verification of the assay in an independent study population and comparison with the established marker mesothelin., Methods: For a case-control study in men, a total of 163 cases of pleural MM and 163 controls were available from Australia, another 36 cases and 72 controls were recruited in Germany. All controls had asbestosis and/or plaques. Calretinin and mesothelin were determined by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in serum or plasma collected prior to therapy. We estimated the performance of both markers and tested factors potentially influencing marker concentrations like age, sample storage time, and MM subtype., Results: Calretinin was able to detect all major subtypes except for sarcomatoid MM. Calretinin showed a similar performance in Australian and German men. At a pre-defined specificity of 95% the sensitivity of calretinin reached 71% and that of mesothelin 69%, when excluding sarcomatoid MM. At 97% specificity, the combination with calretinin increased the sensitivity of mesothelin from 66% to 75%. Sample storage time did not influence the results. In controls the concentrations of calretinin increased 1.87-fold (95% CI 1.10-3.20) per 10 years of age and slightly more for mesothelin (2.28, 95% CI 1.30-4.00)., Conclusions: Calretinin could be verified as a blood-based marker for MM. The assay is robust and shows a performance that is comparable to that of mesothelin. Retrospective analyses would not be limited by storage time. The high specificity supports a combination of calretinin with other markers. Calretinin is specific for epithelioid and biphasic MM but not the rarer sarcomatoid form. Molecular markers like calretinin and mesothelin are promising tools to improve and supplement the diagnosis of MM and warrant further validation in a prospective study.

C(U)RB-65 (confusion, (urea >7 mol · L(-1),) respiratory frequency ≥ 30 breaths · min(-1), systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≤60 mmHg and age ≥ 65 years) is now the generally accepted severity score for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Europe. In an observational study based on the large database from the German nationwide performance measurement programme in healthcare quality, including data from all hospitalised patients with CAP during 2008-2010, different CRB-age groups (≥ 50 and ≥ 60 years) across the total CAP population and three entities of CAP (younger population aged <65 years, patients aged ≥ 65 years not residing in nursing homes and those with nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP)) were validated for their potential to predict in-hospital death. 660 594 patients were investigated. Mortality was n=93 958 (14.0%). In the total population, CRB-80 had the optimal area under the curve (0.690, 95% CI 0.688-0.691). However, in the younger cohort, CRB-50 performed best (0.730, 95% CI 0.724-0.736), with good identification of low-risk patients (CRB-50 risk class 1: 1.28% deaths, negative predictive value 98.7%). In the elderly, CRB-80 as the optimal age group performed worse (0.663, 95% CI 0.660-0.655 in patients not residing in nursing homes; 0.608, 95% CI 0.605-0.611 in those with NHAP). In the latter group, all CRB-age groups failed to identify low-risk patients (CRB-80 risk class 1: 22.75% deaths, negative predictive value 81.8%). Patients with hospitalised CAP aged <65 years may be assessed by the CRB-50 score. In those aged ≥65 years (not NHAP) assessed by the CRB-65 score, low-risk patients are already are at an increased risk of death. In NHAP patients, even the use of CRB-80 does not identify low-risk patients and should be accompanied by the evaluation of functional status and comorbidity.