Search

Background: Guidelines on myocardial infarction (MI) recommend antithrombotic and anticoagulatory treatment at time of diagnosis. MI with ST segment elevation (STEMI) is mostly a certain diagnosis. Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) has diagnostic uncertainty and remains a working diagnosis in the prehospital setting., Objective: Assessment of prehospital loading with aspirin and heparin depending on ACS subtype and pretreatment with oral anticoagulants., Methods: The PRELOAD survey was a nationwide German study. STEMI/NSTE-ACS scenarios were designed and varied in pretreatment: I) no pretreatment, II) new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), III) vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Loading strategy was assessed and included: a) aspirin (ASA), b) unfractionated heparin (UFH), c) ASA + UFH, d) no loading., Results: A total of 708 emergency physicians were included. In NSTE-ACS without pretreatment, 79% chose loading (p < 0.001). ASA + UFH (71.4%) was the preferred option. In corresponding STEMI scenario, 100% chose loading and 98.6% preferred ASA + UFH (p < 0.001). In NSTE-ACS with NOAC pretreatment, 69.8% favored loading (p < 0.001); in VKA pretreatment the corresponding rate was 72.3% (p < 0.001). In each scenario, ASA was the preferred option. In STEMI with NOAC pretreatment, 97.5% chose loading (p < 0.001); analogous rate was 96.8% in STEMI with VKA pretreatment (p < 0.001). ASA was the preferred option again., Conclusions: Prehospital loading was the preferred treatment strategy despite the diagnostic uncertainty in NSTE-ACS and guidelines recommending loading at time of diagnosis. Pretreatment with oral anticoagulants resulted in a strategy shift to loading with only aspirin. In STEMI patients, this indicates potential undertreatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite all efforts, mortality of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains high. Patients with OHCA due to a primary shockable rhythm typically have a better prognosis. However, outcome worsens if return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) cannot be achieved quickly. There is insufficient evidence for maximum duration of resuscitation in these patients and it is unclear, which patients profit from transport under ongoing CPR., Objective: Investigate predictors for favourable neurologic outcome in OHCA patients with presumed cardiac cause due to refractory shockable rhythm (rSR)., Methods: Retrospective analysis of OHCA patients that presented to a tertiary hospital due to a rSR., Results: One hundred seventy-five OHCA patients with presumed cardiac cause due to rSR were included. Overall hospital mortality was 50% and 83% of initial survivors were discharged with a good neurologic outcome [cerebral performance category (CPC) 1-2]. In patients with a time from cardiac arrest to ROSC of > 45 min, 18% survived to CPC 1-2. Independent predictors for good neurologic outcome were age, lower no-flow time and lower serum lactate levels at hospital arrival., Conclusion: In an urban setting, a significant proportion of OHCA patients with rSR can survive to a good neurologic outcome, despite very long time to ROSC.