Search

Introduction: In Germany, up to 75% of platelet concentrates (PCs) are administered to haematological and oncological patients. Only limited transparency exists on the characteristics of haematological/oncological patients receiving PC transfusions, treatment patterns, and guideline adherence in daily clinical routine care. This information would be key for managing platelet supply and optimal platelet usage strategies. This study aimed to analyse data from clinical routine transfusions to fill the aforementioned information gaps and to create an inventory as a blueprint for electronic data capturing systems that allow simplified, recurring analyses. Methods: Prospective open-label, single-centre, observational study in a German tertiary teaching haematological/oncological setting. All inpatients who received any transfusion of PCs (pathogen-inactivated or conventional) in routine use over a period of 3 months (March 2015–May 2015) were consecutively included. Except for age (≥18 years), no exclusion criteria were applied. For guideline adherence, the Cross-Sectional Guidelines for Therapy with Blood Components and Plasma Derivatives – amended edition 2020 were used. An inventory blueprint was created through a narrative literature review and the data collected in this study. Results: Ninety-four patients received 942 PCs. The mean (±SD) age was 54.6 (±13.9) years, 68% were male and 86% were diagnosed with a haematological disease. Thirteen patients received 42% of all transfused PCs. The mean ± SD number of transfused PC per patient was 10.81 ± 9.24. Five (0.5% per transfusion) minor adverse events were documented. Approximately 19% of PCs were not administered according to existing guidelines. The mean transfusion interval was 1.71 ± 1.1 days, and the mean increment was 12.62 ± 14.7 G/L. The inventory showed which platelet transfusion-specific data should be documented for answering questions in terms of quality, effectiveness, and management of PC transfusions. Conclusions: Platelet transfusions in a haematological/oncological setting are highly individual in terms of the total number of transfusions and transfusion intervals. The majority of all PC transfusions were given to only a small group of patients. Continuous, structured real-world data collection/evaluation and benchmarking with data from more centres seems essential in determining specific needs in this vulnerable patient group, assessing the quality of transfusion practices, determining effectiveness, and anticipating future demand for platelets and a sustainable blood supply. So far, not all relevant data are collected routinely. The advancing digitalization of health systems offers opportunities to collect and link data and thus make them more accessible and evaluable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endocrine therapy is recommended for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: ACT-FASTER was a German prospective non-interventional cohort study in postmenopausal women with HR+ ABC receiving fulvestrant 500 mg as first line (1 L), second line (2 L) or third line (3 L), or exemestane (any line) in the real-world palliative setting. Primary study objectives included the effectiveness of fulvestrant according to line of palliative treatment measured by time to progression (TTP), and real-life data on the epidemiology and management of these patients. Results: Of 498 evaluable patients (mean age 67.5 years), 99% were estrogen receptor-positive. On study, 86.7% of patients received fulvestrant 500 mg and 13.3% exemestane. Median TTP was 9.7 months in patients receiving fulvestrant 1 L; 6.8 months for 2 L; and 6.7 months for 3 L. The comparison between fulvestrant 1 L palliative treatment and 2 L or 3 L showed that early initiation of treatment prolonged TTP (hazard ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.48). Treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: Fulvestrant 500 mg was administered successfully to patients under daily practice conditions, and both medications were well tolerated. TTP was longest in patients treated with fulvestrant 500 mg 1 L compared with 2 L and 3 L in the palliative care setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sepsis is a major cause of mortality during the neutropenic phase after intensive cytotoxic therapies for malignancies. Improved management of sepsis during neutropenia may reduce the mortality of cancer therapies. Clinical guidelines on sepsis treatment have been published by others. However, optimal management may differ between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. Our aim is to give evidence-based recommendations for haematologist, oncologists and intensive care physicians on how to manage adult patients with neutropenia and sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients requiring transfusion medicine and hemotherapy in an inpatient setting are incorporated into the German Diagnosis Related Groups (G-DRG) system in multiple ways. Different DRGs exist in Major Diagnostic Category 16 for patients that have been admitted for the treatment of a condition from the field of transfusion medicine. However, the reimbursement might be not cost covering for many cases, and efforts have to be intensified to find adequate definitions and prices. We believe that this can only be successful if health service research is intensified in this field. For patients requiring hemotherapy and transfusion medicine concomitant to the treatment of an underlying disease such as cancer, multiple systems exist to increase remuneration, among them the Patient Clinical Complexity Level (PCCL) and complex constellations to induce DRG splits. For direct reimbursement of high cost products, additional remuneration fees (Zusatzentgelte, ZE) are the most important. In addition, expensive innovations not reflected within the DRGs can be reimbursed after application and negotiation of the New Diagnostic and Treatment Methods (Neue Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden, NUB) system. The NUB system guarantees that medical progress is put rapidly into clinical practice and prevents financial issues from becoming a stumbling block for the use of innovative drugs and methods. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In recent years antifungal stewardship (AFS) programmes have been increasingly recommended to provide optimal antifungal treatment. In a previous study (study I) in the department of haematology and oncology of a German tertiary care hospital we found areas for improvement concerning antifungal prescription. Subsequently, AFS measures were implemented and their impact on quality of antifungal use was assessed in this study., Methods: AFS measures included medical training (two sessions), a pocket card summarising main recommendations for antifungal use, and daily pharmaceutical counselling on the ward. In a 6-month observational study, antifungal prescriptions were analysed and compared to the previously collected data (study I) concerning indication, choice of drug, dosing, duration and drug-drug interactions. The study was approved by the university hospital ethical review board., Results: Antifungal agents were prescribed for 103/1169 inpatients. Compared to study I, a significant increase in dosage accuracy (+ 19.3%; p < 0.05) and correct choice of drug (+ 15.9%; p < 0.05) was noted, as well as a decrease in potential clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with concomitant medication (- 13.9%; p < 0.05). However, no significant improvement in indication and duration of antifungal treatment was identified. 56 recommendations were given to the prescribing physicians (acceptance rate: 66.1%)., Conclusions: The implementation of AFS interventions based on pharmaceutical presence on the ward was associated with an improvement in antifungal use; however, indication and duration of therapy need to be communicated by infectious disease specialists. Considering the proportionally short observation period, the long-term effects of our AFS interventions need to be further investigated.

Invasive fungal infections in haematological and oncological patients have a major impact on morbidity, mortality and treatment costs. Therefore, rational use of antifungal agents is important for optimal patient care and resource use. The study's objective was to analyse antifungal usage in a German tertiary teaching hospital, department of haematology and oncology, to evaluate quality of antifungal treatment and to assess the need for an antifungal stewardship programme. This retrospective observational study included patients ≥18 years receiving systemic antifungals for prophylaxis or therapy of invasive fungal infection between January and June 2016. Appropriateness of antifungal prescriptions was evaluated in accordance with guidelines of the German Society of Haematology and Oncology (DGHO) and drug labelling. In total, 104/1278 (8.1%) patients received antifungals. One hundred seventy-one antifungals were prescribed: 48 for prophylaxis, 104 for empirical and 19 for targeted therapy. In 127 (74.3%) prescriptions, indication was appropriate, and in 132 (77.2%), choice of drug. Antifungals were correctly dosed in 131 prescriptions (76.6%). Thirty-four antifungals (20.0%) were co-administrated with interacting drugs (5 mild to moderate, 29 severe interactions). Results of this analysis demonstrate that use of systemic antifungals in routine care differs in a substantial number of patients from guideline and labelling recommendations. To optimise antifungal use, the implementation of antifungal stewardship programmes seems to be justified., (© 2018 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.)

Background: The current healthcare climate demands pharmacoeconomic evaluations for different treatment strategies incorporating drug acquisition costs, costs incurred for hospitalisation, drug administration and preparation, diagnostic and laboratory testing and drug-related adverse events (AEs). Here we evaluate the pharmacoeconomics of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B as first-line therapies for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients with haematological malignancy and prolonged neutropenia or who were undergoing haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in Germany or Spain., Methods: A decision analytic model based on a decision tree was constructed to estimate the potential treatment costs of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B. Each model pathway was defined by the probability of an event occurring and the costs of clinical outcomes. Outcome probabilities and cost inputs were derived from the published literature, clinical trials, expert panels and local database costs. In the base case, patients who failed to respond to first-line therapy were assumed to experience a single switch between comparator drugs or the other drug was added as second-line treatment. Base-case evaluation included only drug-management costs and additional hospitalisation costs due to severe AEs associated with first- and second-line therapies. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Cost estimates were inflated to 2011 euros (€)., Results: Based on clinical trial success rates of 52.8% (voriconazole) and 50.0% (liposomal amphotericin B), voriconazole had lower total treatment costs compared with liposomal amphotericin B in both Germany (€ 12,256 versus € 18,133; length of therapy [LOT] = 10-day intravenous [IV] + 5-day oral voriconazole and 15-day IV liposomal amphotericin B) and Spain (€ 8,032 versus € 10,516; LOT = 7-day IV + 8-day oral voriconazole and 15-day IV liposomal amphotericin B). Assuming the same efficacy (50.0%) in first-line therapy, voriconazole maintained a lower total treatment cost compared with liposomal amphotericin B. Cost savings were primarily due to the lower drug acquisition costs and shorter IV LOT associated with voriconazole. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were sensitive to drug price, particularly the cost of liposomal amphotericin B., Conclusions: Voriconazole is likely to be cost-saving compared with liposomal amphotericin B when used as a first-line treatment for IA in Germany and Spain.

Invasive fungal infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in those with haematological malignancies and recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Difficulties in diagnosing invasive fungal infections and subsequent delays in treatment initiation lead to unfavourable outcomes and emphasise the importance of prophylaxis. Since the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology in 2009, results of 14 additional clinical studies have been published comprising 2,899 patients and initiating this update. Key recommendations for adult patients are as follows: Posaconazole remains the drug of choice during remission-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with graft versus host disease (AI). In the pre-engraftment period of allogeneic transplantation, several antifungals are appropriate and can be recommended with equal strength: voriconazole (BI), micafungin (BI), fluconazole (BI) and posaconazole (BII). There is poor evidence regarding antifungal prophylaxis in the post-engraftment period of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation if no steroids for treatment of graft versus host disease are required. Aerosolised liposomal amphotericin B inhalation in conjunction with fluconazole can be used in patients with prolonged neutropenia (BII).

Background: German data on economic consequences of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are limited., Patients and Methods: A retrospective, observational study based on chart review of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ITP was conducted at a German university hospital. Costs are presented from the hospital perspective., Results: Of 50 eligible patients, 45 could be classified by disease duration: 19 patients < 3 months (38%, newly diagnosed ITP), 12 patients ≥ 3 to < 12 months (24%, persistent ITP), 19 patients ≥ 12 months (38%, chronic ITP). Complications included 85 bleeding events in 43 patients, including 3 intracranial haemorrhages. Documented were 955 outpatient visits in 43 patients (86%) and 92 inpatient hospital admissions in 45 patients (90%). Of the 46 patients (92%) treated, all received corticosteroids, 25 (50%) intravenous immunoglobulin, and 7 (14%) further therapies. 12 patients (24%) underwent splenectomy. Average total direct medical costs (mean (standard deviation)) were 17,091 (18,859) per patient, 12,749 (11,663) in 17 newly diagnosed ITP patients with a 0.88-month (0.65 months) average disease duration, and 29,868 (29,397) in 13 chronic ITP patients with a 33.5-month (16.8 months) average disease duration. Inpatient stays were the main cost drivers., Conclusion: These data concerning current healthcare provision for ITP patients in Germany indicate considerable resource consumption and the need for more effective treatment options in individual patients., (Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Current guidelines recommend glucocorticoids and splenectomy as standard 1(st) and 2(nd) line treatments for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We sought to find out how German ITP-patients are treated with respect to these guidelines., Methods: Members of a patient support association ≥18 years with a self-reported history of chronic ITP>12 months were surveyed with a web-based questionnaire., Results: 122 questionnaires were evaluated. 70% of patients had chronic ITP for more than 5 years and 20% an average platelet count of ≤30·10(9)/L. 41% of the patients reported haematomas or petechiae more than once or twice and up to 12 times or more per year and 17% oropharyngeal and nasal bleeds. 11% had been admitted to hospital during the last 12 months. 88% had received or currently receive glucocorticoids, 27% were splenectomised. IVIG had been given to 55%, rituximab to 22%, anti-D to 12%, ciclosporin to 7%, while complementary and alternative medical treatments had been used by 36%. 50 women responded to questions concerning pregnancy. 14 (28%) had been advised not to become pregnant. 23 reported pregnancies and 10 (44%) required treatment for their ITP during pregnancy., Conclusion: Glucocorticoids are the most common therapy for chronic ITP but complementary and alternative treatments already come second and less than ⅓ of patients are splenectomised. This and the frequent use of complementary medicines suggests patients' dissatisfaction with conventional approaches. Many patients receive off-label therapies. There is a major need for adequate counselling and care for pregnant ITP-patients.