Search

Simple Summary: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare disease and accounts for about 5% of thyroid carcinomas. In contrast to other thyroid cancers, MTC can be detected by calcitonin (Ctn) measurement in blood samples. However, the interpretation of Ctn values is difficult since reference values for Ctn are sex-specific, assay-dependent, and can also be elevated in benign thyroid diseases and certain extrathyroidal conditions. Here, we report on the results of Ctn screening in 12,984 adult patients with thyroid nodules from our nuclear medicine practice. The Ctn values were elevated in 207 (1.6%) patients. Further clarification was possible in 124/207 cases, of which MTC could be ruled out in 108 cases. In 16/12,984 patients, MTC was confirmed. Thus, the extrapolated MTC prevalence is 0.14% in our patients. We thus recommend Ctn screening even in patients with very small thyroid nodules. High quality standards in pre-analytics, Ctn measurement, and the interpretation of data must be ensured. Background: We provide an update on calcitonin (Ctn) screening for the early detection of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and present the results of a large single-center analysis evaluating sex-specific cut-off-levels and long-term courses. Methods: A total of 12,984 consecutive adult patients (20.1% male and 79.9% female) with thyroid nodules who had undergone routine Ctn measurement were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with confirmed suspicious Ctn values were referred for surgery. Results: Ctn measurements were elevated in 207 (1.6%) patients, with values below twice the sex-specific reference limit in 82% of these cases. Further clarification was possible in 124/207 cases, of which MTC could be ruled out in 108 cases. Histopathological assessment confirmed MTC in 16/12,984 patients. Conclusions: Our extrapolated MTC prevalence of 0.14% is significantly lower than that described in early international screening studies. The stimulation test can usually be dispensable when using a decision-making concept based on sex-specific basal Ctn cut-off values. Ctn screening is recommended even in patients with very small thyroid nodules. High quality standards in pre-analytics, laboratory measurements, and the interpretation of data must be ensured, as well as close interdisciplinary cooperation between medical disciplines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Lately, a more personalized approach in the management of advanced thyroid cancer patients has improved the outcomes, and several novel molecularly guided therapies, including selective RET inhibitors (sRETis), have demonstrated promising efficacy in clinical trials. RET (rearranged during transfection) variants are the most prevalent oncogenic event in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). We here found RET oncogene variants in 44/48 prospectively collected MTC tumor samples from patients treated with more unselective kinase inhibitors vandetanib and/or cabozantinib. Our study shows that RET variants were highly prevalent in patients with advanced MTC, and the treatment results in RET-positive cases were similar to those reported in unselected cohorts. Background: RET (rearranged during transfection) variants are the most prevalent oncogenic events in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). In advanced disease, multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MKIs) cabozantinib and vandetanib are the approved standard treatment irrespective of RET status. The actual outcome of patients with RET-positive MTC treated with MKIs is ill described. Methods: We here retrospectively determined the RET oncogene variant status with a targeted DNA Custom Panel in a prospectively collected cohort of 48 patients with advanced MTC treated with vandetanib and/or cabozantinib at four German referral centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In total, 44/48 (92%) patients had germline or somatic RET variants. The M918T variant was found in 29/44 (66%) cases. In total, 2/32 (6%) patients with a somatic RET variant had further somatic variants, while in 1/32 (3%) patient with a germline RET variant, additional variants were found. Only 1/48 (2%) patient had a pathogenic HRAS variant, and no variants were found in 3 cases. In first-line treatment, the median OS was 53 (95% CI (95% confidence interval), 32–NR (not reached); n = 36), and the median PFS was 21 months (12–39; n = 33) in RET-positive MTC patients. In second-line treatment, the median OS was 18 (13–79; n = 22), and the median PFS was 3.5 months (2–14; n = 22) in RET-positive cases. Conclusions: RET variants were highly prevalent in patients with advanced MTC. The treatment results in RET-positive cases were similar to those reported in unselected cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Management of patients with advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) remains a therapeutic challenge. The multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) vandetanib and cabozantinib have been approved for the treatment of progressive MTC based on prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in phase 3 clinical trials. Patients and Methods: To evaluate clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, efficacy, and treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of vandetanib and cabozantinib in MTC patients outside clinical trials at four German tertiary care centers. Forty-eight patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2018 were included. PFS and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 46 years (15-80 years); a germ line RET (rearranged during transfection) mutation was known in 6 (13%) patients. Thirty-two (67%) patients showed progressive disease before TKI initiation. Forty-seven (98%) patients were treated with vandetanib and 23 (48%) patients with cabozantinib. Vandetanib was first-line treatment in 41 (85%) patients and cabozantinib in 7 (15%) patients. Partial response was the best response in 12 (26%) patients treated with vandetanib and in 5 (22%) patients treated with cabozantinib. Sixteen (34%) patients treated with vandetanib and 3 (13%) patients treated with cabozantinib had stable disease ≥24 weeks. The median PFS for vandetanib and cabozantinib was 17 months [95% confidence interval, CI, 9.3-24.6 months] and 4 months [CI 3.1-4.9 months], respectively. The 6- and 12-month survival rates were 98% and 86% for vandetanib and 78% and 70% for cabozantinib, respectively. The median OS for vandetanib and cabozantinib was 53 months [CI 43.7-62.3 months] and 24 months [CI 5.9-42.1 months], respectively. In vandetanib-treated patients, the PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients aged ≤60 years at TKI initiation and in patients with ≥5 TEAEs. Additionally, the PFS was longer in the absence of bone metastases. In cabozantinib-treated patients, the PFS was significantly longer in patients experiencing TEAEs and in patients aged ≤60 years, and the OS was significantly longer in patients who had TEAEs and in patients with ≥5 TEAEs. Conclusions: Vandetanib and cabozantinib are effective treatment options in the majority of MTC patients. We hypothesize that the poorer prognosis of cabozantinib-treated patients in our retrospective analysis is most likely due to its use as second-line treatment after treatment failure on vandetanib. However, different degrees of efficacy of the two drugs are possible.

The treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (rrDTC) and medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) remains challenging. Based on phase III clinical studies, four multi-kinase inhibitors (MKI) are approved for the treatment of progressive thyroid cancer in Germany. The indications for starting systemic treatment remain a challenge as the diseases can be stable and asymptomatic over long periods of time. In contrast, MKI treatment, which slows the disease progression but is not curative, is often associated with side effects that can impair quality of life. For this reason, an aim is to develop more specific treatments with low off-target effects. In this context selective RET kinase inhibitors represent a promising new approach, which is currently tested intensively in clinical trials, e.g. for advanced symptomatic MTC.