Search

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health literacy was found to be an asset to manage health-related information. The HLS-COVID-Q22 has been developed to measure COVID-19 health literacy. External validation needs to be assessed in different populations to verify the questionnaire's functioning. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the HLS-COVID-Q22 in a sample of German school principals., Methods: The sample consisted of 2187 German school principals who completed the HLS-COVID-Q22 online from April to March 2021. The data was analyzed using Rasch analysis, applying the Partial Credit Model for polytomous data. Dimensionality, item fit statistics and rating scale functioning was tested. Values for item difficulty and person ability as well as reliability indices were computed., Results: Unidimensionality could be confirmed. The rating scale categories worked as intended, participants used every rating step category. Generally, item fit was verified. One item showed potential misfit but could remain in the questionnaire as excluding the item did not reduce reliability. A person separation index of 3.41 and person reliability of 0.92 showed excellent differentiation between COVID-19 health literacy levels. Furthermore, the values for item separation of 20.08 and item reliability of 1.0 indicate good construct validity., Conclusions: The German version of the HLS-COVID-Q22 appears to be a reliable measurement tool for the target population. Evidence for construct, statistical and fit validity was collected. Future studies need to test additional types of validity like convergent and divergent validity to further evaluate the questionnaire. Moreover, the psychometric properties of the translated versions of the HLS-COVID-Q22 should be compared using Rasch analysis., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Participants gave written informed consent prior to taking part in the survey. Participation was voluntary, and the questionnaire was completed anonymously. This study has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Bielefeld University Ethics Board (Reference No 2021-030). Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Internationally, a variety of definitions for public health interventions (PHI) exist. In the German-speaking countries, however, a definition is still outstanding. Therefore, the aim of this study was to derive consensus criteria for the definition of PHI from the expert perspective of science and practice., Methods: A Delphi survey with two online rounds was conducted from December 2022 to February 2023. Six criteria were formulated by a working group and posed for consensus: 1) the intention of the intervention, 2) potential conflicts of interest of the initiators of the intervention, 3) primary vs. secondary/tertiary prevention, 4) costs, 5) targeting, and 6) the reach of the intervention. In both Delphi rounds, experts from academia and practice were recruited through relevant networks and associations throughout the German-speaking world. The judgments were asked about standardized rating scales with the possibility of open justification., Results: In the first Delphi round, n = 52 and in the second round n = 43 experts from research, care and administration/management in health care participated. Consensus was reached on four of the six criteria after the second Delphi round: the intention of the intervention, possible conflicts of interest of the initiators of the intervention, primary vs. secondary/tertiary prevention, and the scope of the intervention. From the perspective of the experts interviewed, these are the criteria that distinguish PHI., Discussion and Conclusion: Based on the consensus criteria, PHI can be defined more concretely. Thus, the results contribute to a better inter- and transdisciplinary understanding. Ideally, the criteria will make it easier to assign interventions to the public health sector in the future, even if a precise examination will be necessary in individual cases, among other things because the experts disagreed on the criteria of costs and how to address the target group., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Background: Health literacy is gaining importance as it concerns the ability of individuals to encounter the complex demands of health in modern societies. Little is known about the environmental associations of health literacy in high-income countries. This study aims to (i) analyse urban-rural differences in health literacy and further (ii) investigate the interrelations of associated factors., Methods: Based on secondary analyses using a population-based survey of individuals aged 35 years and older from Berlin, Germany, and the surrounding rural area. Health literacy, sociodemographic factors (gender, age, educational level, marital status, income), environmental factors (urban/rural) and health behaviour (physical activity) were assessed with questionnaires. T-tests, Analyses of Variance and multiple regression with interaction terms have been applied., Results: In total, 1822 participants (51.2% female and 56.8% living in an urban region) took part in this study. Health literacy was significantly higher in rural regions (mean = 35.73, SD = 7.56) than in urban regions (mean = 34.10, SD = 8.07). Multiple multivariate regressions showed that living in urban regions, being older, having vocational or basic education, having mid or low income, being widowed, having moderate or low levels of physical activity were significantly negatively associated with health literacy. Incorporating interaction terms showed significance that being older is positively associated with urban regions., Conclusion: We found higher levels of health literacy in rural regions and also demonstrated that multiple associated factors of health literacy work congruously. Thus, the environment, associated factors and their interplay must be considered in future urban-rural health literacy research., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.)

Background: The Institute of Quality Assurance and Transparency in Health Care (IQTIG) was commissioned by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) to include the patient perspective in the quality assurance programme for patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI) and coronary angiography ("QS PCI"). This article describes both the development methodology and the survey-based quality indicators., Methods: On the basis of a systematic literature research, focus groups with patients, interviews with doctors and an expert group meeting, quality criteria were defined which were relevant to patients. These criteria were translated into PREMs and PROMs. The questionnaires were subjected to a two-phase pretest. Quality indicators were composed by aggregating the items., Results: Altogether, 12 topic areas were identified which are relevant to patients receiving percutaneous cardiac intervention or coronary angiography. Here, communication and interaction were of high importance. In addition, information before, during and after the procedure was very relevant, and, likewise, the health care professionals' interaction with patients. Also, symptoms and treatment effects were important. In accordance with the defined topics, 19 quality indicators were developed which can display quality of health care from the patients' perspective., Conclusion: The development of PREMs and PROMs expanded the quality assurance programme "QS PCI" to include significant dimensions relevant to patients, which can, therefore, provide valuable information to improve patient-centred care., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Background: This study examines the extent to which schools implement activities on health promotion and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, potential differences with regard to demographic variables, school type, state, and participation in state health promotion initiatives are determined., Methods: As part of the international COVID Health Literacy Network, an online-based study was conducted from March to April 2021 with 2186 school principals from the German federal states of Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, Lower Saxony, and North Rhine-Westphalia. The implementation status of COVID-19-related school health promotion was assessed using a self-developed instrument. After examining the factorial structure of the instrument, univariate and bivariate data analyses were performed., Results: Three dimensions of implementing school health promotion can be identified: (1) COVID-19-related support for pupils, (2) health promoting design of teaching, learning, and working conditions, and (3) the principles of Health Promoting Schools. A low level of implementation is observed for aspects of teaching, learning, and working conditions as well as for participation and cooperation with community stakeholders. Significant differences are observed, with female, older, and primary school principals reporting a higher implementation status, while for federal states non-homogenous differences are found. Stratified by participation in state health promotion initiatives, only schools with a certificate in health promotion show a higher level of implementation., Discussion: The results indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic is a disruptive event for schools, impeding the implementation of holistic activities on health promotion and prevention. In particular, more attention should be given to the creation of health promoting working conditions, participation, and community cooperation., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Digital communication technologies are playing an important role in the health communication strategies of governments and public health authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The internet and social media have become important sources of health-related information on COVID-19 and on protective behaviors. In addition, the COVID-19 infodemic is spreading faster than the coronavirus itself, which interferes with governmental health-related communication efforts. This jeopardizes national public health containment strategies. Therefore, digital health literacy is a key competence to navigate web-based COVID-19-related information and service environments., Objective: This study aimed to investigate university students' digital health literacy and web-based information-seeking behaviors during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany., Methods: A cross-sectional study among 14,916 university students aged ≥18 years from 130 universities across all 16 federal states of Germany was conducted using a web-based survey. Along with sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, subjective social status), the measures included five subscales from the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI), which was adapted to the specific context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Web-based information-seeking behavior was investigated by examining the web-based sources used by university students and the topics that the students searched for in connection with COVID-19. Data were analyzed using univariate and bivariate analyses., Results: Across digital health literacy dimensions, the greatest difficulties could be found for assessing the reliability of health-related information (5964/14,103, 42.3%) and the ability to determine whether the information was written with a commercial interest (5489/14,097, 38.9%). Moreover, the respondents indicated that they most frequently have problems finding the information they are looking for (4282/14,098, 30.4%). When stratified according to sociodemographic characteristics, significant differences were found, with female university students reporting a lower DHLI for the dimensions of "information searching" and "evaluating reliability." Search engines, news portals, and websites of public bodies were most often used by the respondents as sources to search for information on COVID-19 and related issues. Female students were found to use social media and health portals more frequently, while male students used Wikipedia and other web-based encyclopedias as well as YouTube more often. The use of social media was associated with a low ability to critically evaluate information, while the opposite was observed for the use of public websites., Conclusions: Although digital health literacy is well developed in university students, a significant proportion of students still face difficulties with certain abilities to evaluate information. There is a need to strengthen the digital health literacy capacities of university students using tailored interventions. Improving the quality of health-related information on the internet is also key., (©Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan, Melanie Messer, Angela Y M Leung, Rafaela Rosário, Emily Darlington, Katharina Rathmann. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.01.2021.)

Background: Journal hand searching offers the possibility to complement a literature search as part of systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses. Hand searching is indicated in cases where scientific journals with potentially relevant publications addressing the research question are not indexed in a literature database. However, it is often unclear whether these journals are actually indexed, and when they are, in which literature databases. In many cases, it is also unknown which journals should be searched by hand in addition to systematic literature search after databases to be searched have been specified. Therefore, the project aimed to investigate the indexation of selected scientific health science journals and to provide an overview of indexation in order to facilitate the hand search planning process., Methods: Journals from German-speaking countries covering eight professional fields (medical laboratory assistance, occupational therapy, midwifery, logopedics, nursing, physiotherapy, public health and rehabilitation) were considered that publish original research papers or systematic reviews or other review types in German and/or English. Two researchers per field identified relevant journals and independently analyzed the indexing locations using the journal websites. In case of missing information, we contacted the editors., Results: A total of 70 journals were included: from 1 to 17 journals per field. These journals are indexed in 1 to 29 databases. Twelve journals are not indexed or do not offer information concerning indexation. Indexation is distributed across n=74 different literature databases. Most journals are indexed in LIVIVO (n=55) and bibnet.org (n=33). Other common indexing databases are Scopus (n=18), Web of Science Core Collection (n=16), PSYNDEX (n=13), and Embase (n=10)., Conclusions: The results indicate a heterogeneous indexation of the included journals. Only a small number is indexed in common international literature databases such as MEDLINE or CINAHL. On the other hand, only a few journals are not indexed in any database. The results can be used as a basis to define databases for literature searches as part of systematic reviews. In addition, the findings might guide the selection of journals for hand searching after literature databases have been defined., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Background: For people in old age and in need of care, there is an increased risk of being affected by poverty. The aim of the study was to explore the forms of poverty that nurses in Germany perceive in older people in need of care who are living at home, as well as the perceived strategies to deal with this situation regarding health and nursing care and the consequences for the possibilities of participation. Methods: A qualitative study was performed as a secondary data analysis of 39 transcribed problem-oriented expert interviews. The data analysis was conducted through content and thematic analysis. Results: Two forms of poverty among people in need of care were described by the nurses interviewed: 1) a self-imposed austerity, and 2) a material and financial poverty. The possible consequences of poverty reported in those in need of care are harmful self-restrictions and limited opportunities for participation, e.g. through the multiple use of medical aids and reduced intake of medications, but also restricted food intake. This situation is often accepted without complaint by people in need of care. However, restrictions in social activities can be a considerable burden on the quality of life of patients. The interviewees described that offering professional help can be challenging, because people in need of care and affected by poverty often show a degree of high shame in accepting financial support or negate their own precarious life situation, but also because support structures in the social and health system are limited. Conclusion: The results indicate how older people in need of care impose self-restrictions due to their poverty, which are harmful to health and limit the quality of life. Furthermore, the described strategies can pose a significant risk to the medical safety of patients. This has implications for the nursing and social care, but also for the medical treatment of the affected patients. The existing support systems seem to be only partially prepared for dealing with such situations. In view of a trend towards an older population structure, future research should put more emphasis on the user-friendly adaptation of the social and health systems. Strategies to prevent and deal with poverty in older people in need of care, easy access to social support systems, as well as the preparation of the health professions for the associated tasks seem to be particularly indicated., Competing Interests: The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Health literacy is especially important for older people to maintain or enhance remaining health resources and self-management skills. The aim of the study was to determine the level of health literacy and the association between health literacy, demographic and socio-economic factors in German older adults aged 65 years and above stratified by age group. Health literacy was assessed via computer-assisted personal interviews using HLS-EU-Q47 on a representative sample of the German-speaking population. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and logistic regression modelling stratified by age group were conducted to assess health literacy of 475 respondents aged 65 years and above. Overall, 66.3% of all respondents aged 65 years and above had limited health literacy. Limited health literacy was especially prevalent among respondents above 76 years of age (80.6%). Limited health literacy was associated with financial deprivation (OR: 3.05; 95% CI: 1.99-4.67) and limited functional health literacy (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.29-3.61). Financial deprivation was strongest predictor for limited health literacy in the total sample and stratified by age group. Limited health literacy is a frequent phenomenon in German adults aged 65 years and above. Research on health literacy in old age and the role in health disparities is urgently needed.

Health literacy is a relatively recent concept in Europe. First international investigations indicate that a substantial part of the population has significantly impaired subjective health literacy. In Germany there is a lack of meaningful data. Therefore, 2 comprehensive studies have been started that will provide population representative results, as well as take the health literacy level of vulnerable groups such as older people and migrants into consideration., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)