Search

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infections can result in a broad spectrum of symptoms from mild to life-threatening. Long-term consequences on lung function are not well understood yet. Methods: In our study, we have examined 134 post-COVID patients (aged 54.83 ± 14.4 years) with dyspnea on exertion as a leading symptom 6 weeks to 24 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection for bronchodilator responsiveness during their stay in our pulmonary rehabilitation clinic. Results: Prior to bronchial dilation, 6 out of 134 patients (4.47%) presented an FEV1/FVC ratio below lower limit of normal (Z-score = −1.645) indicative of an obstructive airway disease. Following inhalation of a β2-adrenergic agonist we measured a mean FEV1 increase of 181.5 mL in our cohort, which was significantly elevated compared to a historical control group (ΔFEV1 = 118 mL). 28.7% of the patients showed an increase greater than 200 mL and 12% displayed a significant bronchodilation response (>200 mL ΔFEV1 and >12% FEV1 increase). Interestingly, no significant difference in bronchial dilation effect was observed when comparing patients hospitalized and those non-hospitalized during the course of their SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion: Our data provide evidence for increased prevalence of obstructive ventilatory defects and increased bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19. Depending on the extent of this complication, post-COVID patients may benefit from an adapted β2-inhalation therapy including subsequent reevaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients can have features of both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. However, there is still no consensus how to precisely define this patient population. In addition, there are little data on the effectiveness of biologics in these patients. Method: Presence of COPD was defined by a smoking history of ≥10 pack years (PY), a postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < lower limit of normal (LLN) and FEV1 < 80% predicted, a carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) < LLN, and dyspnoea on exertion as a leading symptom. Presence of asthma was defined by high type 2 biomarkers (blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL and/or FeNO ≥50 ppb), typical clinical features of asthma (including nocturnal respiratory symptoms), and a documented history of a clinical benefit from inhaled and/or oral glucocorticoid treatment. We analysed data from 20 patients fulfilling the criteria for both COPD and asthma who were newly treated with a biologic due to recurrent exacerbations despite high-dose inhaled triple therapy. Results: Median values before treatment with a biologic were as follows: 40 PY, FEV1 42% predicted, DLCO 45% predicted, 475 eosinophils/μL blood, FeNO 48 ppb. Median duration of biologic treatment (mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, omalizumab, or tezepelumab) was 12 months. There were significant improvements in exacerbations (most prominent effect), asthma control, and lung function during biologic treatment. Conclusions: Various types of biologics approved for severe asthma treatment can be effective in patients with both COPD and asthma. We propose an easy-to-use definition of these patients for routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a VR Headset in routine clinical practice as an additional source of information for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and their companions. Methods: Survey including 121 patients with DME, 22 companions, and 14 healthcare professionals from 8 ophthalmology centers in Germany. Patients' and their companions' health literacy was assessed by questionnaires including knowledge statements before and after watching a VR-based 3-D educational video. HCPs' perspectives on the usability of a VR Headset were also assessed. Results: Patients' mean age was 63.4 ± 12.2 years, 64.5% were men, and 76% (92/121) had previous anti-VEGF (VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor) injections. After using the VR Headset, over 85% of patients and companions felt better informed about DME and its treatment. Patients' mean (± SD) number of correct answers to knowledge statements increased from 13.2 ± 3.7 before to 15.5 ± 2.3 after using the VR Headset. Over 95% of patients and companions rated content and ease of understanding of the video as "very good" or "good." Most patients and all companions considered the use of a VR Headset as a positive experience, most wishing to obtain information via VR Headset in the future. Most physicians and all medical assistants rated the effect of the VR Headset on patient satisfaction as positive and suggested further VR modules. Conclusion: After using the VR Headset, patients with DME and their companions demonstrated knowledge gains that may be meaningful individually and contribute to better adherence. This may offer an additional opportunity for knowledge transfer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assessing the risk for specific patient groups to suffer from severe courses of COVID-19 is of major importance in the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This review focusses on the risk for specific patient groups with chronic respiratory conditions, such as patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis (CF), sarcoidosis, interstitial lung diseases, lung cancer, sleep apnea, tuberculosis, neuromuscular diseases, a history of pulmonary embolism, and patients with lung transplants. Evidence and recommendations are detailed in exemplary cases. While some patient groups with chronic respiratory conditions have an increased risk for severe courses of COVID-19, an increasing number of studies confirm that asthma is not a risk factor for severe COVID-19. However, other risk factors such as higher age, obesity, male gender, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney or liver disease, cerebrovascular and neurological disease, and various immunodeficiencies or treatments with immunosuppressants need to be taken into account when assessing the risk for severe COVID-19 in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The fixed-dose combination of budesonide/formoterol (B/F) has been available in the Spiromax® dry powder inhaler since 2014. Objectives: To assess patient satisfaction, inhaler use errors, and disease control in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with B/F Spiromax. Methods: This non-interventional, prospective, 12-week study enrolled consecutive asthma or COPD patients who had recently begun treatment with B/F Spiromax or were switched from another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination to B/F Spiromax in routine clinical practice. Patients recruited from 243 specialist respiratory clinics or general practices in Germany were assessed for patient satisfaction (Satisfaction with Inhalers and Preference questionnaire), inhaler application errors (modified Easy Low Instruction over Time checklist), disease control, and safety. Results: The population included 3,943 patients: asthma n = 2,707 (68.7%); COPD n = 1,236 (31.3%). At baseline, 60.1% of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their previous inhaler, and this increased to 88.8% at week 12 of B/F Spiromax use. Overall, 62.1% of pre-treated patients preferred B/F Spiromax to their old inhaler. The frequency of any handling error observed with B/F Spiromax at week 12 was lower than at baseline (11.9 vs. 25.5% of patients, respectively). After 12 weeks, 77.4% were assessed as having improved (minimally, much, or very much) overall health status versus baseline. Guideline-defined disease severity (as rated by physicians) and patient-reported symptom severity improved during the study in both asthma and COPD patients. B/F Spiromax was well tolerated. Conclusion: B/F Spiromax was associated with high patient satisfaction, low device handling error rate, and improvements in clinical outcomes in real-world clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dendritic cells (DCs) play a key role in the host defence against inhaled pathogens. However, the phenotype of blood DCs in patients with acute respiratory infections is unknown. Objective: To investigate the number and the expression of function-associated molecules of blood DCs in patients with acute infectious pneumonia. Methods: Sixteen patients with acute pneumonia and 19 controls without pneumonia were included in the study. The number as well as the expression of function-associated molecules of myeloid DCs (mDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) were analysed in peripheral blood using four-colour flow cytometry. Results: Elevated concentrations of procalcitonin (median: 0.55 ng/ml) and the rapid response to antibiotic treatment suggested a bacterial origin of the pneumonia in the patients. Total mDC (median: 27% of the controls) and pDC counts (median: 53% of the controls) were markedly reduced in patients with pneumonia, as compared to the controls. Percentages of blood mDCs, but not pDCs, were negatively correlated with serum concentrations of C-reactive protein. Patients with pneumonia were characterised by a significantly increased expression of Fc gamma receptors (CD32 and CD64) on mDCs and the Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) on pDCs. Conclusions: Circulating DCs are markedly reduced in patients with pneumonia, and characterised by an up-regulation of molecules recognising pathogen-associated molecular patterns and opsonised antigens. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This retrospective study was designed to investigate the re‐injection interval, efficacy and safety of OZURDEX® in routine clinical practice. Methods This analysis contains data from 87 patients from 10 sites in Germany who had received at least 2 OZURDEX® injections. Data was collected from the time of the patients' first injection until 3 – 6 months following their latest OZURDEX® injection. Results The mean time to OZURDEX® re‐injection between 1st and 2nd treatments was 141 days (5.03 months) in the overall population. Mean time intervals for the BRVO and CRVO sub‐populations were 153 days (5.46 months) and 127 days (4.52 months) respectively. In the overall population, a mean LogMAR BCVA improvement from 0.68 to 0.51 was recorded following the last OZURDEX® injection (mean time of 11.0 weeks post‐injection). For BRVO, mean improvement was from 0.54 to 0.43 (mean time of 10.5 weeks post injection) and for CRVO, 0.83 to 0.58 (mean time of 11.5 weeks post injection). Reductions in central retinal thickness were also observed. Intraocular pressure measurements over 25mmHg were reported in 19.5% of patients. No glaucoma surgeries were reported. 5 patients underwent cataract surgery during the course of the study (4 had known lens opacity at baseline and opacity status data from the 5th was missing). Conclusion In this real life study, OZURDEX® was found to be safe and effective with repeat treatments. The mean re‐injection interval for RVO patients was 5.0 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) usually result in a pronounced reduction of visual acuity and represent one of the most frequent indications for retinal surgery. If diagnosed and treatment is initiated at an early stage, surgery has a high success rate with respect to both hole closure and improvement of visual acuity. Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based staging and sizing enables an estimation of the surgical outcome. The differential diagnostic distinction from clinically similar disorders, such as lamellar macular holes, macular pseudoholes, and foveoschisis is clinically relevant as the pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment are significantly different. While vitrectomy with peeling of the inner limiting membrane (ILM) and gas tamponade is established as the standard treatment for FTMH, some aspects of treatment are handled differently between surgeons, such as the timing of surgery, the choice of endotamponade and the type and duration of postoperative positioning. For FTMH associated with vitreomacular traction, alternative treatment options in addition to vitrectomy include intravitreal ocriplasmin injection and pneumatic vitreolysis. The current clinical guidelines of the German ophthalmological societies summarize the evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of FTMH., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Vitreomacular traction is a tractive foveolar adhesion of the posterior vitreous limiting membrane, resulting in pathological structural alterations of the vitreomacular interface. This must be differentiated from physiological vitreomacular adhesion, which exhibits a completely preserved foveolar depression. Symptoms depend on the severity of the macular changes and typically include reduced visual acuity, reading problems and metamorphopsia. High-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) imaging enables classification of the sometimes only subtle morphological changes. If pronounced vitreomacular traction is accompanied by epiretinal gliosis and alterations to the outer retina, it is referred to as a vitreomacular traction syndrome. Vitreomacular traction has a high probability of spontaneous resolution within 12 months. Therefore, treatment should only be carried out in cases of undue suffering of the patient and with symptoms during bilateral vision and a lack of spontaneous resolution. In addition to pars plana vitrectomy, alternative treatment options, such as intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin and pneumatic vitreolysis are discussed for vitreomacular traction with an associated macular hole; however, ocriplasmin is no longer available in Germany. The best anatomical results in comparative investigations were achieved by vitrectomy. Pneumatic vitreolysis is controversially discussed due to the increased risk of retinal tears. In one of the current S1 guidelines of the German ophthalmological societies evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of vitreomacular traction are summarized., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Genetic factors contribute to the development and progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We aimed to assess the association of drusen as phenotypic characteristics of early AMD and their progression with polymorphisms in the CFH, ABCA1, and ARMS2 genes., Methods: In the Münster Aging and Retina Study (MARS), drusen were detected in 406 patients with early AMD and 170 healthy controls according to the International Classification using fundus photographs, with a follow-up examination after 2.6 years (median). Six drusen features were assessed: drusen number (

Background: In phase III trials, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy with ranibizumab (Lucentis) in patients with choroidal neovascularization due to AMD was demonstrated in a 24-month period with monthly injections. Other studies and models suggested that flexible reinjection regimens can provide similar visual results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the flexible, predominantly visual acuity-driven ranibizumab retreatment regimen in clinical practice in Germany., Patients and Methods: Best-corrected visual acuity (VA, logMAR) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were recorded initially and every 4-6 weeks during follow-up (mean follow-up 75.5 weeks) from 152 eyes. All eyes were treated initially 3 times with ranibizumab at 4-weekly intervals, and retreated with another three injections if visual acuity decreased and/or CRT increased (>100 μm), and/or if new angiographic leakage and/or new retinal hemorrhages developed. Visual acuity development was analyzed in the whole group. A quartile analysis was also performed, and visual course was correlated with CRT. In all groups, numbers and times of reinjections within the first year were registered and analyzed., Results: An increase in mean VA of 0.14 (SD 0.22) logMAR could be observed after 3 months, but during follow-up from months 3 to 12 the mean visual acuity decreased again by 0.14 (SD 0.24) logMAR, and was similar to the initial VA despite several reinjections (mean five injections). Stratification of patients according to the visual effect after 3 months (quartile analysis) demonstrated a differentiation of the visual course. Quartile 1, with the largest increase in VA after 3 months and reduction of the retinal edema, lost this positive effect during follow-up (100% of eyes received further injections). In contrast, quartile 2, with a minor increase, and quartile 3 demonstrated a stabilized response during follow-up (80% reinjections), while quartile 4 demonstrated a further loss in VA despite reinjections initially and during follow-up (60% reinjections)., Conclusions: The flexible, predominantly visual acuity-driven ranibizumab retreatment regimen employed in clinical practice in Germany generally resulted in a loss of initially gained VA during 12 months of follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that this negative effect was especially present in patients with relatively bad VA at treatment entry as well as the highest visual gain. Because this result demonstratse that a visual acuity-related retreatment regimen can not preserve the initial positive treatment effects with ranibizumab in exudative AMD, a revision of this schematic retreatment regimen used in Germany and adaptation to more sensitive retreatment parameters is recommended.

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate possible prognostic and predictive factors (morphologic and functional) of the individual visual gain/decline after anti-VEGF therapy of exudative AMD., Patients/methods: Best corrected visual acuity (VA), microperimetric sensitivity (RS), retinal thickness (RT) and autofluorescence pattern (AF) were documented in 128 patients with exudative AMD., Results: Eyes with classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) had the best visual gain but still remained at a lower level. Eyes which initially had the lowest VA had the largest gain and those with good initial VA could maintain this level. There was no correlation between RT and visual outcome. Eyes with initially normal AF had a significantly greater visual gain., Conclusions: The type of CNV, initial VA, RS and the initial RT were only of limited usefulness, while the initial foveal AF was most important predictive factor. This may indicate that preexisting changes and irreversible damage in the outer retina and/or retinal pigment epithelium are responsible for the resulting VA after therapy.