Search

Purpose: The cumulative incidence for non-Hodgkin lymphoma's (NHL) after primary Hodgkin's disease (HD) ranges between 1% and 6%. To investigate the course of disease for secondary NHL, we retrospectively analyzed patients treated within clinical trials of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG) since 1981., Patients and Methods: From 1981 to 1998, the GHSG conducted three generations of clinical trials for the treatment of primary HD involving a total of 5,406 patients. Reference histology by an expert panel was obtained for 4,104 of the patients. Data on incidence, treatment, and outcome of secondary NHL were updated in March 1999., Results: At first diagnosis of HD, the pathologists rejected 114 (2.1%) of 5,520 cases initially diagnosed as HD and rediagnosed them as primary NHL. Fifty-two (0.9%) of the remaining 5,406 patients developed a secondary NHL. One patient was excluded from further analyses because of insufficient documentation. Six patients had no further therapy because of patient refusal (n = 1) or rapidly progressive disease (n = 5). For the remaining 45 patients, overall response rate was 43% (36% complete response and 7% partial response). The actuarial 2-year freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 24% and 30%, respectively, and for patients with diffuse large-cell lymphoma, it was 28% and 35%, respectively. Time of occurrence of secondary NHL after first diagnosis of HD and variables employed in the age-adjusted International Prognostic Factor Index (IPFI) significantly influenced treatment outcome., Conclusion: In the GHSG, the incidence of secondary NHL with 0.9% is relatively low compared with previously reported series. The prognosis of secondary NHL seems dismal and is significantly influenced by time of occurrence and the age-adjusted IPFI. In a subset of patients with secondary NHL, long-term disease-free survival could be achieved.

Purpose: The HD9 trial aims to evaluate whether moderate dose escalation and/or acceleration of standard polychemotherapy is beneficial for advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD). Two variants of a novel bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) scheme (standard and escalated dose) are compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (COPP)/doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD)., Patients and Methods: The randomized, three-arm trial recruited patients in stages IIB and IIIA with risk factors and stages IIIB and IV. BEACOPP in baseline dose contains all drug dosages of COPP/ABVD (except vincristine and procarbazine) rearranged in a shorter, 3-week cycle. Escalated BEACOPP uses higher doses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. After eight chemotherapy cycles, initial bulky and residual disease is irradiated. The trial is monitored and analyzed by means of a sequential strategy., Results: An interim analysis with 505 assessable patients and a median follow-up of 23 months showed a significant inferiority (according to sequential monitoring strategy) of the COPP/ABVD regimen in progression rate and freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) compared with the pooled results of both BEACOPP variants. The 24-month FFTF rate was 75% for COPP/ABVD and 84% for BEACOPP pooled (P = .034). There was 12% progressive disease with COPP/ABVD and 6% with BEACOPP pooled. Differences in survival were not significant in sequential analysis. The acute toxicity of baseline BEACOPP resembled that of COPP/ABVD; escalated BEACOPP showed increased but manageable hematologic toxicity., Conclusion: Combined with local irradiation, BEACOPP in one or both variants shows superior disease control compared with COPP/ABVD, with acceptable acute toxicity. Further follow-up is required to assess the effect of dosage and the effect on survival and late toxicities.