1. Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence to Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD: A German Claims Data Study.
- Author
-
Vogelmeier CF, Beeh KM, Schultze M, Kossack N, Richter LM, Claussen J, Compton C, Noorduyn SG, Ismaila AS, and Requena G
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Germany, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Administration, Inhalation, Treatment Outcome, Quinuclidines administration & dosage, Time Factors, Databases, Factual, Chlorobenzenes administration & dosage, Chlorobenzenes therapeutic use, Administrative Claims, Healthcare, Drug Therapy, Combination, Benzyl Alcohols administration & dosage, Benzyl Alcohols therapeutic use, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Glycopyrrolate administration & dosage, Lung drug effects, Lung physiopathology, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive drug therapy, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive physiopathology, Medication Adherence, Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists administration & dosage, Muscarinic Antagonists administration & dosage, Bronchodilator Agents administration & dosage, Drug Combinations
- Abstract
Purpose: Triple therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β
2 -agonist/inhaled corticosteroid) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience recurrent exacerbations. Multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) is associated with poor adherence and persistence. This study assessed comparative adherence and persistence to single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) versus MITT among patients with COPD in a real-world setting in Germany., Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis using the WIG2 benchmark database identified patients with COPD newly initiating triple therapy with MITT or SITT (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI] or formoterol/beclomethasone/glycopyrronium bromide [FOR/BDP/GLY]) November 2017-June 2019. Eligible patients were ≥35 years with 1 year's continual insurance prior to triple therapy initiation and no previous record of triple therapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC) at 6, 12, and 18 months post-treatment initiation; persistence (time until treatment discontinuation) was measured at 6, 12, and 18 months, with a gap of >30 days used to define non-persistence., Results: Of 5710 patients included in the analysis (mean age 66 years), 71.4% initiated MITT and 28.6% initiated SITT (FF/UMEC/VI: 41.4%; FOR/BDP/GLY: 58.6%). Mean PDC was higher among SITT versus MITT users at all time points; at each time point, mean PDC was highest among FF/UMEC/VI users. During the first 6 months following treatment initiation, higher adherence was exhibited by FF/UMEC/VI (29%) and FOR/BDP/GLY (19%) users versus MITT users. Over the entire observation period, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of persistent patients; at 18 months, 16.5% of FF/UMEC/VI users were persistent versus 2.3% of MITT users., Conclusion: Patients initiating SITT in Germany had significantly higher adherence and persistence compared with patients initiating MITT over 6 to 18 months following treatment initiation. Among SITT, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of adherence and persistence., Competing Interests: CFV has given presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by Aerogen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Grifols, GSK, Insmed, MedUpdate, Menarini, Novartis, Nuvaira, Roche, and Sanofi. KMB is a full-time employee of insaf Respiratory Research Institute. He has received personal or institutional compensation for services on advisory boards or consulting for AstraZeneca, Bosch Healthcare, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Clario, Elpen, GSK, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pohl Boskamp, Sanofi, sterna, and Zentiva; and compensation for speaker activities in scientific meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, ERT, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Pohl Boskamp, Sanofi, and Teva, all outside the submitted work. The institution has received compensations for design and performance of clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Novartis, Parexel, Pearl Therapeutics, sterna, and Zentiva. MS is an employee of ZEG Berlin, which received funding from GSK to conduct this study. NK and LMR are employees of WIG2 GmbH, that conducted the study on behalf of GSK. JC, CC, SGN, ASI, and GR are employees of, and/or hold financial equities in GSK. ASI is also a part-time, unpaid professor at McMaster University. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Vogelmeier et al.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF