Search

Introduction: The immunogenicity and safety of one dose of Tdap-IPV (tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis and inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine) and two doses of Td-IPV (tetanus, diphtheria and inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine) were assessed in adults who had not received a diphtheria- and tetanus-containing vaccine in the last 20 years., Methods: This open-label, multicentre study was conducted in adults aged ≥ 40 years with no diphtheria- and tetanus-containing vaccine in the last 20 years. Participants received one dose of Tdap-IPV followed by two doses of Td-IPV (0, 1, 6 month schedule). Primary immunogenicity objectives: to demonstrate acceptable seroprotection rates (percentage of participants with antibody titre above threshold) post-dose 3 for diphtheria (≥ 0.1IU/mL by seroneutralization assay [SNA]); tetanus (≥ 0.1IU/mL by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]); and poliomyelitis (≥ 8 1/dil by SNA); and to evaluate the percentage of participants with an antibody concentration ≥ 5EU/mL (by ELISA) for pertussis antigens post-dose 1. Seroprotection rates were acceptable if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was >95%. Percentage of participants with basic clinical immunity against diphtheria (≥ 0.01IU/mL) was also assessed. Safety (adverse events [AEs] and serious AEs) was assessed after each dose., Results: Overall, 336 participants were included (mean age: 60.2 years). Post-dose 3 seroprotection rates were: diphtheria, 94.6% (CI 91.5-96.8); tetanus and poliomyelitis, 100% (CI: 98.8-100). Percentage of participants with an antibody titre ≥ 5EU/mL against pertussis antigens was ≥ 95.8% for all five pertussis components. Basic clinical immunity against diphtheria was achieved in 100% (CI: 98.8-100) of participants. AEs were reported more frequently following vaccination with Tdap-IPV (post-dose 1: 65.3%) than with Td-IPV (post-dose 2: 48.3%; post-dose 3: 50.3%)., Conclusions: This study highlights the benefits of using Tdap-IPV followed by two doses of Td-IPV in an adult population to achieve maximal protection against diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis and pertussis simultaneously., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A medical experiment of precancerous screenings of the cervix with colposcopy involving Jewish inmates was conducted in 1943 at Auschwitz by Eduard Wirths, the chief camp physician (SS-Standortarzt), his brother, Helmut Wirths, gynecologist of Hamburg-Altona with the complicity of the prestigious professor Hans Hinselmann who developed the colposcope. This medical experiment illustrates the relationships between physicians carrying out experiments at Auschwitz and prestigious medical research of the most reputed German universities. Hans Hinselmann should be remembered as complicit with atrocities and should not continue to be honored. Physicians must know what tortures and atrocities were committed for the promotion of the development of colposcopy.