Search

Background: Self-concept consists of self-perceptions and is influenced by the life course of the person.Objectives: This study investigated associations between self-concept and erectile dysfunction (ED) in 45-year-old German men.Materials and Methods: Forty-five-year-old, heterosexual men who had participated in the PROBASE-study were included. Erectile Function was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6). The presence of ED was defined by IIEF-6 score ≤ 25. Self-concept was assessed using the facets "body image" (three items from the Dresden Body Image Inventory, DKB-35), "perception of masculinity" (three items from the Male Role Norms Scale, MRNS), "perceived social pressure with regard to sexual performance" (four newly constructed items), and "sexual self-esteem" (three newly constructed items). Scores for these facets of self-concept can range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate a more positive body image, higher sexual self-esteem, a more modern understanding of masculinity, and greater perceived social pressure. Differences in self-concept between men with ED and without ED were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney-U-test. Furthermore, Cohen's d effect sizes (ES d) were calculated.Results: The responses of 3143 men were analyzed. Men with ED (16.2 %) have significantly lower scores regarding body image (mean 3.6 ± 0.6 vs 3.8 ± 0.5; p < 0.001; ES d = -0.5), perception of masculinity (mean 3.4 ± 0.7 vs 3.7 ± 0.6; p < 0.001; ES d = -0.4), and sexual self-esteem (mean 3.6 ± 0.6 vs 3.9 ± 0.5; p < 0.001, ES d = -0.4) than men without ED. Furthermore, they had significantly higher scores for perceived social pressure (mean 2.1 ± 0.7 vs 1.5 ± 0.5; p < 0.001; ES d = 1.2).Conclusions: Self-concept and ED are associated in 45-year-old men. Men with ED have a more negative body image, a more traditional understanding of masculinity, more negative sexual self-esteem, and greater perceived social pressure with regard to sexual performance than men without ED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in industrialized countries. The annual incidence rate in Germany is about 60,000. Every year, 13,000 men die of this disease. Nevertheless, the 10-year survival rate is relatively favorable compared to other carcinomas.Prostate cancer screening is discussed controversially both nationally and internationally. This is due to the fact that the determination of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for tumor detection beginning in the 1980s led to over-diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer and consequently to over-therapy-usually by radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.This review article will discuss the largest randomized controlled trials of PSA-based prostate cancer screening to date. It will highlight the advantages and disadvantages of this screening and give an outlook on the development of future strategies for prostate cancer screening.For PSA screening, the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) study showed a relative reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality of approximately 21% after a median follow-up period of 13 years. However, in absolute figures, relatively few men will benefit from population-based screening and the rate of over-diagnosed men remains high.The procedure in a Swedish long-term study, in which risk-adapted screening intervals were applied on the basis of the assessment of a baseline PSA level at a young age (40-50) showed promising results and may provide a solution to this dilemma. This strategy is the basis for the currently largest study on risk-adapted prostate cancer screening ( www.PROBASE.de ), which evaluates this concept for the first time with a randomized design.

Purpose: Diagnostic and prognostic tools for prostate cancer (PC) are suboptimal, causing overtreatment of indolent PC and risk of delayed treatment of aggressive PC. Here, we identify six novel candidate DNA methylation markers for PC with promising diagnostic and prognostic potential., Methods: Microarray-based screening and bisulfite sequencing of 20 nonmalignant and 29 PC tissue specimens were used to identify new candidate DNA hypermethylation markers for PC. Diagnostic and prognostic potential was evaluated in 35 nonmalignant prostate tissue samples, 293 radical prostatectomy (RP) samples (cohort 1, training), and 114 malignant RP samples (cohort 2, validation) collected in Denmark, Switzerland, Germany, and Finland. Sensitivity and specificity for PC were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analyses. Correlations between DNA methylation levels and biochemical recurrence were assessed using log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses., Results: Hypermethylation of AOX1, C1orf114, GAS6, HAPLN3, KLF8, and MOB3B was highly cancer specific (area under the curve, 0.89 to 0.98). Furthermore, high C1orf114 methylation was significantly (P < .05) associated with biochemical recurrence in multivariate analysis in cohort 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.10; 95% CI, 1.89 to 5.09) and was successfully validated in cohort 2 (HR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.17 to 9.12). Moreover, a significant (P < .05) three-gene prognostic methylation signature (AOX1/C1orf114/HAPLN3), classifying patients into low- and high-methylation subgroups, was trained in cohort 1 (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.90) and validated in cohort 2 (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.31 to 4.13)., Conclusion: We identified six novel candidate DNA methylation markers for PC. C1orf114 hypermethylation and a three-gene methylation signature were independent predictors of time to biochemical recurrence after RP in two PC patient cohorts.

Background: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) is an approved second-line treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following docetaxel therapy with a significant survival benefit compared with mitoxantrone. However, grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 82% of patients., Objective: To report on the safety results of mCRPC patients treated within a compassionate-use programme in Germany., Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 111 patients with a mean age of 67.9 yr (range: 49-81 yr) and progressive mCRPC were included. Patients had received a mean number of 12.7 ± 10.8 cycles (range: 6-69 cycles) of docetaxel with a mean cumulative dose of 970.9 mg/m(2); mean time from last docetaxel application to progression was 6.95 mo (range: 2-54 mo). Of the patients, 31.5% progressed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase only; the remainder had a combination of PSA increase and clinical progression., Intervention: Cbz at a dosage of 25mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 wk combined with 5mg of oral prednisone twice a day., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Treatment-associated toxicity was the primary study end point; progression-free and overall survival were secondary end points. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed., Results and Limitations: Patients received a mean number of 6.5 ± 2.2 cycles of Cbz and a mean cumulative dose of 160.3 ± 51.5mg/m(2). Grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded in 34 patients (30.6%) and 18 patients (16.2%), respectively. Grade 3/4 anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were reported in 4.5%, 7.2%, and 0.9% of the patients, respectively. Neutropenic fever was reported in 1.8% of the patients. Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal toxicity was identified in 4.5% of the patients. Three patients died because of Cbz-related toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factors were used in 17.1% of patients. The limitations are due to the nonrandomised nature of the trial., Conclusions: Treatment with Cbz is tolerable and is associated with a low incidence of serious adverse events in a real-world patient population with CRPC. The outcome of serious adverse events can be minimised with proactive treatment management and conscientious monitoring., (Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) seems to be a useful tool for prostate cancer (PCa) detection in patients with a previous negative biopsy but persistently increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. Additionally, it enables correct cancer localization in patients with known PCa under active surveillance to avoid misclassification on repeat biopsies. Nevertheless, suspicious lesions on MRI findings need verification by biopsy. The aim of the present study was to establish a standardized functional prostate MRI reporting scheme., Methods: Prostate MRI with T(2)-weighted images, T(1)-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of 56 consecutive patients were performed on a 3-T scanner. Patients with prior negative random transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy and continuous suspicion for PCa as well as patients under active surveillance were included. The MRI localization report of suspicious lesions followed a standardized scheme. TRUS-guided random biopsy with addition of targeted biopsy cores was performed afterwards based on the structured report., Results: Of the 56 patients, 18 had suspicious MRI findings and subsequently underwent repeat biopsy under guidance of the standardized localization scheme. PCa was documented in 72% (13/18)., Conclusions: A standardized reporting scheme of suspicious findings on prostate MRI leads to higher success rates as compared to standard random TRUS-guided biopsy., (Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.)