Search

Purpose: To analyze the reasons for patient dissatisfaction after phacoemulsification with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and the outcomes after intervention. Setting: Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Methods: This retrospective review comprised eyes of patients dissatisfied with visual outcomes after multifocal IOL implantation. Outcomes analyzed included type of visual complaint, treatment modality for each complaint, and degree of clinical improvement after intervention. Results: Thirty-two patients (43 eyes) reported unwanted visual symptoms after multifocal IOL implantation, including in 28 eyes (65%) with an AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and 15 (35%) with a ReZoom IOL. Thirty patients (41 eyes) reported blurred vision, 15 (18 eyes) reported photic phenomena, and 13 (16 eyes) reported both. Causes of blurred vision included ametropia (12 eyes, 29%), dry eye syndrome (6 eyes, 15%), posterior capsule opacification (PCO) (22 eyes, 54%), and unexplained etiology (1 eye, 2%). Causes of photic phenomena included IOL decentration (2 eyes, 12%), retained lens fragment (1 eye, 6%), PCO (12 eyes, 66%), dry-eye syndrome (1 eye, 2%), and unexplained etiology (2 eyes, 11%). Photic phenomena attributed to PCO also caused blurred vision. Thirty-five eyes (81%) had improvement with conservative treatment. Five eyes (12%) did not have improvement despite treatment combinations. Three eyes (7%) required IOL exchange. Conclusions: Complaints of blurred vision and photic phenomena after multifocal IOL implantation were effectively managed with appropriate treatment. Few eyes (7%) required IOL exchange. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomy should be delayed until it has been determined that IOL exchange will not be necessary. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To determine which of 3 methods for measuring preoperative refractive error yields the best refractive outcomes after wavefront-guided (Visx Star S4) or wavefront-optimized (WaveLight Allegretto Wave) excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Setting: Emory Eye Center and Emory Vision, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Methods: This retrospective analysis of LASIK, performed from June to December 2007, analyzed sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) refractions generated from 3 methods (manifest refraction, aberrometer autorefraction [CustomVue WaveScan], corneal analyzer autorefraction [Nidek ARK-10000 OPD]), actual programmed treatment, and absolute deviation from ideal treatment (deviation) for each technique. Results: In the wavefront-guided group (63 eyes, 33 patients), manifest refraction and aberrometer autorefraction generated similar deviation for sphere and SE; both were significantly better than corneal analyzer autorefraction (P = .02 and P = .03, respectively). Aberrometer autorefraction generated less cylinder deviation than the other methods (both P = .003). In the wavefront-optimized group (61 eyes, 36 patients), manifest refraction generated less deviation for sphere and SE than aberrometer autorefraction or corneal analyzer autorefraction (sphere: P = .005 and P = .009, respectively; SE: P = .005 and P = .002, respectively). Manifest refraction and aberrometer autorefraction cylinder generated similar deviation, while aberrometer autorefraction was less than corneal analyzer autorefraction (P = .041). Conclusions: Overall, manifest refraction was most accurate in generating postoperative emmetropia with both laser treatments; however, aberrometer autorefraction produced the least cylinder deviation for wavefront-guided treatment. Corneal analyzer autorefraction produced the least accurate results with both lasers. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To analyze the changes in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) that occur after wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Setting: Emory Eye Center and Emory Vision, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Methods: This retrospective analysis comprised eyes that had PRK or LASIK from June 2004 through October 2005. Postoperative outcome measures included 3-month uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), changes in the root mean square (RMS) and grouped coefficient HOAs (microns) measured with a corneal analyzer, and subjective assessment of visual aberrations. Results: One hundred consecutive eyes of 54 patients had PRK, and 100 contemporaneous consecutive eyes of 71 patients had LASIK. The PRK and LASIK populations were similar in general demographics, preoperative HOAs, and postoperative UCVA and BSCVA. The mean MRSE was slightly hyperopic after PRK (mean +0.11 diopters [D]) and slightly myopic after LASIK (mean −0.19 D) (P<.0001). There were no statistically significant changes in RMS or grouped coefficient HOA values after PRK or LASIK, nor were there significant differences in postoperative RMS or grouped coefficient HOA values between PRK and LASIK. One percent of PRK and LASIK patients reported a subjective increase in postoperative visual aberrations; 5% reported a subjective improvement postoperatively. Conclusions: Wavefront-optimized excimer laser surgery did not induce significant HOAs after PRK or LASIK. The 2 techniques were equally efficacious and had equivalent postoperative HOA profiles. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To report the first case of Avellino corneal dystrophy exacerbation after LASIK in a white or North American patient., Methods: Case report and literature review., Results: A 25-year-old white female developed progressive corneal opacities after LASIK. Preoperative examination had revealed only subtle white corneal opacities in each eye. The patient's mother had similar corneal opacities. DNA analysis of the patient revealed a heterozygous mutation at the R124H location in the BIGH3 gene., Conclusions: LASIK can exacerbate Avellino corneal dystrophy and should be avoided in patients with this condition. A careful history and genetic analysis can identify affected patients and those at risk.

Purpose: To report the incidence and outcomes of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after LASIK and to analyze potential causative factors., Methods: Retrospective review of 15,119 cases (11,232 primary procedures and 3887 enhancements) from 7168 patients undergoing LASIK from May 1995 through October 2002, comparing preoperative data and postoperative outcomes for each case developing DLK to patients in the study population and a control series of eyes that did not develop DLK., Results: We identified 61 eyes (0.40%) that developed DLK after LASIK. Three study groups were identified based on sterilization protocols used: (1) steam autoclave without reservoir (8348 cases), (2) cassette autoclave with reservoir (6771 cases), (3) steam autoclave without reservoir and new instrument cleaner (1758 cases). Significantly more eyes developed DLK with Protocol 2 (47 cases, 0.94%) than with Protocol 1 (11 cases; 0.1%; P < 0.0001) or Protocol 3 (3 cases, 0.2%; P < 0.0005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of DLK in Protocol 1 versus Protocol 3. DLK was significantly more common after primary procedures than with enhancement procedures only under Protocol 2. No individual developed DLK after more than 1 procedure. Treatment protocols included frequent topical steroids only (24 cases, 39.3%), frequent topical steroids and oral steroids (19 cases, 31.2%), or topical and oral steroids combined with lifting and irrigating beneath the flap (18 cases, 29.5%). Final refractions and visual acuities were not significantly different in eyes that developed DLK and those that did not., Conclusions: DLK is a nonspecific inflammatory response to multiple stimuli that cannot be attributed solely to individual variation in the inflammatory response, the microkeratome, or material deposited by the microkeratome. Sterilizers with reservoirs may cause some cases of DLK. With appropriate diagnosis and treatment, DLK should resolve without sequelae, yielding visual outcomes comparable to cases with uneventful postoperative courses.