Search

Immunization is experienced as painful and may be responsible for needle fear and noncompliance. There are rare evidence-based methods to reduce pain and improve comfort during immunization. There are no French immunization guidelines summarizing the good practices, based on recent studies. This study focused on the methods used by physicians and how they compared with those validated by clinical trials. An online questionnaire was sent to the practitioners from the Infovac network, and a PubMed bibliographic search was conducted. Almost 2000 doctors responded to this survey. Purging the needle was a habit in 77.9% of them and aspiration before injection in 21.1%. Only one-quarter of the responding doctors injected in the deltoid muscle between 15 and 24 months, and some injected in the buttocks at any age. Half of the physicians vaccinated infants in their parent's arms, children were seated with half of the pediatricians and only one-third of the general practitioners (GPs), and teenagers were seated when vaccinated by three-quarters of the doctors. Anesthetic creams were used by 46.6% of the physicians, mostly by pediatricians (61.9%), and for infants. Breastfeeding was suggested by three-quarters of the physicians for infants under 4 months of age, and sugared solutions were used by 55.5% of the pediatricians and 32.3% of the GPs. Half of the doctors used rocking and cuddling for babies under 24 months of age and toys between 11 and 24 months. Many methods are available to distract and improve comfort during immunization. Physicians should choose those they prefer, adjusting for the child's age. There should be French guidelines for immunization techniques, based to the latest clinical surveys, to help improve immunization practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), created by the French Health Insurance Act of August 13, 2004, is an independent scientific public authority, with legal personality and financial autonomy. Involved in the fight against antibiotic resistance, the HAS provides professionals and the general public with a range of tools to encourage the adoption of best practices in the use of antibiotics., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective Linezolid represents an important advance in the treatment of methicillinresistant staphylococci. Its effectiveness should be preserved by appropriate uses. The aims of this survey were to describe the use of linezolid in clinical practice and to assess its overall safety. Methods This retrospective observational study included patients treated with linezolid in 2008 in all departments at the CHU Nantes. A data-collection card was completed using the patients' medical files. Results A total of 179 patients from 23 different departments were included. Fifty-four per cent of indications were outside the Marketing Authorization criteria, and were mainly osteoarticular infections and septicaemia (22% and 8% of total prescriptions, respectively). Inefficacy of first-line antibiotic treatment (23%) and alterations in renal function (23%) were the main reasons for using linezolid, which was prescribed as a first-line therapy in 28% of patients. Fifty-three per cent of infections were documented microbiologically, of which 58% were due to a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. Conclusions Linezolid seems to be a possible therapeutic strategy in case of multiresistant bacteria and/or complex clinical situations. Because many prescriptions fall outside the Marketing Authorization criteria, this study highlights the need to have clinical data available for such situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents abstracts of papers presented at the 39th European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) European Symposium on Clinical Pharmacy and the 3th Société Française de Pharmacie Clinique (SFPC) Congress: Clinical Pharmacy at the Front Line of Innovations in Lyon, France, including "Hallucinations Due to Therapeutic Doses of Ertapenem," "Carboplatin Dosage in Overweight Patient: Case Report" and "Severe Hypokalemia Associated With Flucloxacillin."

The «Standards, Options and Recommendations» (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. To develop good practice guidelines for a good practice of enteral nutrition in oncology, in collaboration with three French learned societies involved in this area. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guideline has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. The good practices suggested in the document approach seven topics: indications and counter-indications, conditions of the installation of the enteral nutrition, monitoring, prevention of complications, education of the patient, specificities of enteral nutrition in children and at home. In the setting of enteral nutrition, feeding tubes, type of insertion, enteral nutrition products, material and techniques of administration are described as well as the criteria permitting their selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]