1. Gradient diffusion strips for detecting azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus sensu lato.
- Author
-
Serrano‐Lobo, Julia, Gómez, Ana, Reigadas, Elena, Muñoz, Patricia, Escribano, Pilar, Guinea, Jesús, Sánchez‐Yebra, Waldo, Lozano, Inmaculada, Marfil, Eduardo, de la Muñoz‐Rosa, Montserrat, Tejero‐García, Rocío, Cobo, Fernando, Castro, Carmen, López, Concepción, Rezusta, Antonio, Peláez, Teresa, Lozano‐Serra, Julia, Jiménez, Rosa, Labayru‐Echeverría, Cristina, and Losa‐Pérez, Cristina
- Subjects
- *
DIFFUSION gradients , *ASPERGILLUS fumigatus , *ITRACONAZOLE , *VORICONAZOLE , *ANTIFUNGAL agents , *GENETIC mutation - Abstract
Background: Studies comparing gradient diffusion strips (GDSs) and the EUCAST E.Def 9.4 microdilution method are scarce, thwarted by a low number of isolates, and restricted to selected antifungal agents. Objectives: We evaluated the performance of GDSs to detect azole resistance in A. fumigatus, including cryptic species. Patients/Methods: A. fumigatus sensu stricto (n = 89) and cryptic species (n = 52) were classified as susceptible or resistant to itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and isavuconazole (EUCAST E.Def 9.4; clinical breakpoints v10). A. fumigatus sensu stricto azole‐resistant isolates had the following cyp51A gene mutations: TR34‐L98H (n = 24), G54R (n = 5), TR46‐Y121F‐T289A (n = 1), F46Y‐M172V‐N248T‐D255E‐E427K (n = 1), F165L (n = 1) and cyp51A gene wild type (n = 3). GDSs (ETEST®, bioMèrieux, Marcy‐l'Etoile, France and Liofilchem®, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) MICs were obtained by following the manufacturer's guidelines. Results: For A. fumigatus sensu stricto, itraconazole MICs >1.5 mg/L, voriconazole >0.38 mg/L, posaconazole >0.75 mg/L, and isavuconazole >0.5 mg/L correctly separated resistant from susceptible isolates with two exceptions. Considering the aforementioned cut‐off MICs, sensitivity/specificity values of GDSs to detect azole resistance were: itraconazole (97%/100%), voriconazole (97%/100%), posaconazole (97%/100%) and isavuconazole (93.3%/100%). For cryptic species isolates, voriconazole MICs >1 mg/L and isavuconazole >0.75 mg/L separated resistant isolates from susceptible isolates with 15 and 27 exceptions, respectively. Considering the aforementioned cut‐off MICs, sensitivity/specificity values were as follows: voriconazole (68.1%/100%) and isavuconazole (25%/100%). For itraconazole and posaconazole, it was not possible to establish cut‐off values. Conclusions: We set tentative cut‐off MIC values to correctly spot resistant Aspergillus fumigatus sensu stricto isolates using GDSs. The performance against cryptic species was poor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF