4 results on '"Rizzi, P."'
Search Results
2. Impact on Breastfeeding According to Implant Features in Breast Augmentation: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.
- Author
-
Bompy L, Gerenton B, Cristofari S, Stivala A, Moris V, See LA, Rizzi P, Braye F, Meningaud JP, Zwetyenga N, and Guillier D
- Subjects
- Adult, Breast Feeding methods, Breast Implantation adverse effects, Cohort Studies, Esthetics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, France, Hospitals, University, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Reference Values, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Breast Feeding statistics & numerical data, Breast Implantation methods, Patient Safety
- Abstract
Background: Exclusive breastfeeding is highly recommended by the World Health Organization during the first 6 months of life. In parallel, breast augmentation with implants is one of the most performed operations in aesthetic surgery., Objective: The goal of our study was therefore to analyze the potential impact of aesthetic breast implants on breastfeeding., Study Design: A retrospective study was carried out in 3 French university hospitals. The main inclusion criterion was adult women of childbearing age (18-50 years old) with bilateral breast hypoplasia. Some features of the surgery, such as the operative indication, the surgical approach, the implant position against the pectoral muscle, and implants features (material, volume, profile), were collected. We conducted a survey by phone about childbirth after the procedure. If the women had children after surgery, we asked them if they breastfed and the characteristics of breastfeeding., Results: In total, 1316 patients received breast implants in the 3 centers from January 2011 to October 2016 and met our inclusion criteria. We included 1073 patients; 998 women had breast implants with no pregnancy. Among the 75 patients (7%) who gave birth after the surgery, 51 wanted to breastfeed (68%). The patients with a retroglandular implant were significantly less able to breastfeed compared with the patients with retromuscular implants (P = 0.0005). No difference was found for age, the type of surgery, the surgical approach, and the shape or type of implant between the successful breastfeeding group and failed breastfeeding group., Conclusion: A woman with aesthetic breast implants has a 75% chance of breastfeeding if desired, regardless of the type and the volume of the implant and the surgical approach. She has an 82% probability of breastfeeding with retromuscular implants and 17% with retroglandular implants.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. [Cornea donation consent by telephone].
- Author
-
Gain P, Thuret G, Chiquet C, Pugniet JL, Rizzi P, Tchaplyguine F, Acquart S, Le Petit JC, and Maugery J
- Subjects
- Family, France, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Patient Selection, Reproducibility of Results, Cornea, Informed Consent, Telephone, Tissue Donors supply & distribution
- Abstract
Background: The cornea donation process often runs into problems of obtaining family consent. A face-to-face interview is often not possible for logistical reasons. We carried out a prospective study on the effectiveness of telephone contact in obtaining donation consent., Material and Methods: Consent was obtained by a single, non medical, hospital coordinator. He contacted families selected on good staff-family relations during the patient's stay. If a face-to-face interview was not possible, a telephone interview was conducted using a standardized procedure., Results: Over 21 months, 334 families were contacted, either in a face-to-face interview (142, 42.5%) or by telephone (192, 57.5%). Donation consent was obtained in 66.5% of cases, 106 times by telephone (47.7%) and 116 times in the face-to-face interview (52.3%). The acceptance rate was 55.2% by telephone and 81.6% face to face (p<0.001)., Conclusions: The telephone interview was an effective method for obtaining consent for cornea donation. Although the acceptance rate using this method is lower than the face-to-face interview, using the telephone should not be overlooked as this enabled procurement of nearly half the corneas in our hospital.
- Published
- 2002
4. Obtaining cornea donation consent by telephone.
- Author
-
Gain P, Thuret G, Loup Pugniet J, Rizzi P, Acquart S, Le Petit JC, and Maugery J
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, France, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Tissue and Organ Harvesting statistics & numerical data, Family, Informed Consent, Telephone, Tissue Donors, Tissue and Organ Procurement organization & administration
- Abstract
Background: Cornea donation process comes up against difficulties in obtaining families' consent. A face-to-face interview is often not possible for logistical reasons. We carried out a prospective study of the effectiveness of telephone contact in obtaining donation consent., Methods: Consent was obtained by a single, nonmedical, hospital coordinator. If a face-to-face interview was not possible, a telephone interview was conducted using a standardized procedure., Results: Over a 21-month period, 334 families were contacted, either in a face-to-face interview (142, 42.5%) or by telephone (192, 57.5%). Donation consent was obtained in 66.5% of cases, 106 times by telephone and 116 times in face-to-face interview. The acceptance rate was 55.2% by telephone and 81.6% face to face (P<0.001). In total, 47.7% of the cornea recovery consents were obtained after telephone interview., Conclusions: Telephone interview is an effective method for obtaining consent to cornea donation. Although the acceptance rate using this method is lower than by face-to-face interview, using the telephone should not be overlooked as this enabled procurement of nearly half the corneas in our hospital.
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.