Search

Background & Aims: Most studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) originate from tertiary care centers with an academic interest. How this emerging entity is accepted and managed by a wider body of gastroenterologists is unknown, despite significant implications for the diagnosis of at-risk subjects and the utilization of healthcare resources. Methods: We conducted a survey among 352 French, board-certified gastroenterologists from a large variety of practices to understand the clinical burden, perceived severity, and management patterns of NAFLD. Results: Half of participants saw >30 new cases (equal to HCV) of NAFLD and 40% >5 new cases of NASH-cirrhosis yearly. Only 20% of patients were referred by endocrinologists; conversely, gastroenterologists overwhelmingly referred NAFLD patients for assessment of metabolic co-morbidities. In patients with metabolic risk factors, a majority of physicians considered the diagnosis of NAFLD, even if other liver diseases co-existed. The diagnosis heavily relies on aminotransferases, hence patients with normal ALT are usually not diagnosed. Liver biopsy is performed for fibrosis staging but not for the diagnosis/grading of steatohepatitis, and mainly decided based on non-invasive fibrosis procedures. Pharmacological treatment is used despite a lack of clear evidence of efficacy. Physicians monitor patients themselves, usually twice a year. Conclusions: NAFLD is recognized and accepted as a disease in itself with potentially severe outcomes. Most at-risk patients are currently missed because of non-referral by endocrinologists and no exploration of those with normal aminotransferases. The medical need for the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD is real in the community of gastroenterologists at large. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background and Aims: The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related cirrhosis has been increasing these last decades. There are no data regarding the prevalence of MASLD-related cirrhosis in intensive care unit (ICU)., Methods: Prospective single-centre study in a cohort of patients hospitalized in the ICU of Hepatology La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital between January 2019 and September 2021. We analysed three groups of patients: MASLD-cirrhosis (alcohol ≤210 g for men and 140 g weekly for women), ALD (alcohol-related liver disease, alcohol>140 g weekly for women or >210 g for men)-cirrhosis alone and MetALD (metabolic and alcohol-related liver disease)-cirrhosis. Endpoints were 1-year transplant-free survival (TFS), further acute decompensation (AD) and re-admission., Results: A total of 410 patients were hospitalized, and 315 analysed: 39 in MASLD, 160 in ALD and 116 in MetALD groups. The global prevalence was 10% for MASLD, 41% ALD and 29.7% for MetALD. Patients in the MASLD group were significantly older (65 vs. 57 and 59 years, p < 0.001), and had lower Child-Pugh (8 vs. 11 vs. 10, p < 0.001) and MELD score (17 vs. 22 vs. 21, p < 0.001). The 1-year TFS was not different between groups (53% vs. 54% vs. 54%, p = 0.96). Cardiovascular mortality was <5% in all groups. The 1-year probability of developing hepatic encephalopathy was significantly higher in the MASLD group (73% vs. 27% and 21%, p < 0.001). There was no difference regarding the development of other complications between groups., Conclusion: MASLD or MetALD was responsible for 1/3 of the causes of cirrhosis in the ICU. MASLD-related cirrhosis is as severe as ALD-related cirrhosis. Liver transplantation should be rapidly discussed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: EDP-305 is an oral farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist under development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Herein, we aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of EDP-305 in patients with fibrotic NASH., Methods: In this double-blind phase II study, patients with fibrotic NASH (without cirrhosis), diagnosed by historical biopsy or phenotypically, were randomized to EDP-305 1 mg, EDP-305 2.5 mg, or placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from baseline to Week 12, and the key secondary endpoint was mean change in liver fat content from baseline to Week 12., Results: Between January 2018 and July 2019, 134 patients were randomized and 132 were evaluated. At Week 12, the least squares mean reductions from baseline in ALT for patients receiving 2.5 mg EDP-305 and 1 mg EDP-305 were -27.9 U/L (95% CI 0.03 to 24.9; p = 0.049) and -21.7 U/L (-5.8 to 18.3: p = 0.304), respectively, compared to -15.4 U/L for those receiving placebo. Absolute liver fat reduction was -7.1% (2.0-7.5; p = 0.0009) with 2.5 mg EDP-305, -3.3% with EDP-305 1 mg, and -2.4% with placebo. The most common (≥5%) adverse events were pruritus, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and dizziness. Pruritus occurred in 50.9%, 9.1%, and 4.2% of patients in the 2.5 mg, 1 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, and led to study drug discontinuation in 20.8% of patients in the 2.5 mg group and 1.8% in the 1 mg group., Conclusions: EDP-305 reduced ALT levels and liver fat content, providing support for a longer-term trial assessing histological endpoints in patients with NASH. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT03421431 LAY SUMMARY: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a chronic hepatic disease that can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis and liver cancer. Results from this phase II study support continued development of EDP-305, an oral farnesoid X receptor agonist, for the treatment of patients with NASH., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest KK received support from Enanta paid to his institution; grants or contracts from Intercept, Gilead, NGM, Madrigal, Pfizer, Enanta, Viking, Celgene, Terns, Corcept paid to his institution; speaker’s and teaching honoraria or consulting fees from Intercept, Gilead, and Inipharm; Stock or stock options from Inipharm. EL received research grants from 89Bio, Allergan Inc, Akero Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Astrazeneca, Axcella Health, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boeringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Durect Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Enyo, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Laboratory for Advanced Medicine, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Metacrine, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Viking Therapeutics, Zydus. AS reports research grants from Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Madrigal, Viking Therapeutics, NovoNordisk, Bristol-Myers Squibb, NorthSea Therapeutics, Galectin, NGM Therapeutics, Intercept, Hepion, Allergan, Ionis, and Boehringer Ingelheim, and stock options from Gilead. B N-T received grants or contracts from Allergan, BMS, Cirius, Enanta, Genfit, Gilead, HighTide, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM payed to Saint Louis University. Payments for DSMB or Advisory Board participation by Akero, Alimentiv, Allergan, Allysta, Alnylam, Amgen, Arrowhead, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Coherus, Cymabay, Durect, Enanta, Fortress, Genfit, Gilead, High Tide, HistoIndex, Innovo, Intercept, Ionis, LG Chem, Lipocine, Madrigal, Medimmune, Merck, Mirum, NGM, NovoNordisk, Novus Therapeutics, pH-Pharma, Sagimet, Target RWE, Theratechnologies, 89Bio. Stock or stock options in HepGene; Honoraria from American Diabetes Association, American Gastroenterological Associations, Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver, Clinical Care Options, Houston Methodist Hospital, NASH Summit, NASH-TAG. ME received support from Enanta Pharmaceuticals for this study; grants or contracts from AbbVie, Gilead, Genfit, Intercept, Assembly, Madrigal, and Novartis; consulting fees from AbbVie, Gilead, and Intercept; and honoraria from AbbVie. JD received support from Enanta Pharmaceuticals for this study. DD, TK, MR, and TD have nothing to disclose. BG, AA, and NA are employees and may be stockholders of Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. VR has received consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo-Nordisk, Galmed, Terns, Theratechnologies, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Genfit, Madrigal, and NGM Bio. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic disease that can progress to end-stage liver disease (ESLD). A large proportion of early-stage NASH patients remain undiagnosed compared to those with advanced fibrosis, who are more likely to receive disease management interventions. This study estimated the disease burden and economic impact of diagnosed NASH in the adult population of France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom in 2018., Methods: The socioeconomic burden of diagnosed NASH was estimated using cost-of-illness methodology applying a prevalence approach to estimate the number of adults with NASH and the attributable economic and wellbeing costs. Given undiagnosed patients do not incur costs in the study, the probability of diagnosis is central to cost estimation. The analysis was based on a literature review, databases and consultation with clinical experts, economists and patient groups., Results: The proportion of adult NASH patients with a diagnosis ranged from 11.9% to 12.7% across countries, which increased to 38.8%-39.1% for advanced fibrosis (F3-F4 compensated cirrhosis). Total economic costs were €8548-19 546M. Of these, health system costs were €619-1292M. Total wellbeing costs were €41 536-90 379M. The majority of the undiagnosed population (87.3%-88.2% of total prevalence) was found to have early-stage NASH, which, left untreated, may progress to more resource consuming ESLD over time., Conclusions: This study found that the majority of economic and wellbeing costs of NASH are experienced in late disease stages. Earlier diagnosis and care of NASH patients could reduce future healthcare costs., (© 2021 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Since 1920, a decrease in serum cholesterol has been identified as a marker of severe pneumonia. We have assessed the performance of serum apolipoprotein-A1, the main transporter of HDL-cholesterol, to identify the early spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) in the general population and its diagnostic performance for the Covid-19., Methods: We compared the daily mean serum apolipoprotein-A1 during the first 34 weeks of 2020 in a population that is routinely followed for a risk of liver fibrosis risk in the USA (212,297 serum) and in France (20,652 serum) in relation to a local increase in confirmed cases, and in comparison to the same period in 2019 (266,976 and 28,452 serum, respectively). We prospectively assessed the sensitivity of this marker in an observational study of 136 consecutive hospitalized cases and retrospectively evaluated its specificity in 7,481 controls representing the general population., Results: The mean serum apolipoprotein-A1 levels in the survey populations began decreasing in January 2020, compared to the same period in 2019. This decrease was highly correlated with the daily increase in confirmed Covid-19 cases in the following 34 weeks, both in France and USA, including the June and mid-July recovery periods in France. Apolipoprotein-A1 at the 1.25 g/L cutoff had a sensitivity of 90.6% (95%CI84.2-95.1) and a specificity of 96.1% (95.7-96.6%) for the diagnosis of Covid-19. The area under the characteristics curve was 0.978 (0.957-0.988), and outperformed haptoglobin and liver function tests. The adjusted risk ratio of apolipoprotein-A1 for survival without transfer to intensive care unit was 5.61 (95%CI 1.02-31.0; P = 0.04)., Conclusion: Apolipoprotein-A1 could be a sentinel of the pandemic in existing routine surveillance of the general population. NCT01927133, CER-2020-14., Competing Interests: TP has several USPTO patents related to the performance of Apoa1 in patients with liver disease, including #10,198,552 Method of diagnosis of fibrotic diseases, #7,860,656 Diagnosis method of hepatic steatosis using biochemical markers, 7,856,319, Diagnosis method of alcoholic steato-hepatitis using biochemical markers, #7,225,080 Diagnosis method of inflammatory, fibrotic or cancerous disease using biochemical markers, and # 6,631,330 Diagnosis method of inflammatory, fibrotic or cancerous disease using biochemical markers, and applications pending: #20200011879 Method of diagnosis of drug induced liver injury, 20190265241 Method of diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases, #3 20140329260 Method of diagnosis of fibrotic diseases, and #20090111132 Diagnosis method of hepatic steatosis using biochemical markers. The data underlying the findings described in the manuscript are fully detailed including the confounding factors, without restriction, in the numerous supplementary files. The commercial affiliation does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: HIV-monoinfected individuals are at high risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Noninvasive tests of steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and fibrosis have been poorly assessed in this population. Using liver biopsy (LB) as a reference, we assessed the accuracy of noninvasive methods for their respective diagnosis: magnetic resonance imaging proton-density-fat-fraction (MRI-PDFF), FibroScan/controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), and biochemical tests., Methods: We enrolled antiretroviral therapy-controlled participants with persistently elevated transaminases and/or metabolic syndrome, and/or lipodystrophy. All had hepatic MRI-PDFF, FibroScan/CAP, FibroTest/NashTest/SteatoTest, APRI, FIB-4, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-fibrosis score. A LB was indicated if suspected significant fibrosis (FibroScan ≥7.1 kPa and/or FibroTest ≥0.49). Performance was considered as good if area under a receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) was >0.80., Results: Among the 140 patients with suspected significant fibrosis out of the 402 eligible patients, 49 had had a LB: median age of 54 years (53-65), body mass index: 26 kg/m (24-30), steatosis in 37 (76%), NASH in 23 (47%), and fibrosis in 31 (63%) patients [F2: 7 (14%); F3: 6 (12%); and F4: 2 (4%)]. Regarding steatosis, MRI-PDFF had excellent and CAP good performances with AUROCs at 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.00) and 0.88 (0.76 to 0.99), respectively, whereas the AUROCs of SteatoTest was 0.68 (0.51 to 0.85). Regarding fibrosis (≥F2), APRI and FIB-4 had good performance with AUROCs at 0.86 (0.74 to 0.98) and 0.81 (0.67 to 0.95). By contrast, FibroScan and FibroTest had poor AUROCs [0.61 (0.43 to 0.79) and 0.61 (0.44 to 0.78)], with very low specificity. Regarding NASH, alanine aminotransferase ≥36 IU/L had good performance with AUROCs of 0.83 (0.71 to 0.94), whereas the NashTest had an AUROC of 0.60 (0.44 to 0.76)., Conclusions: In HIV-monoinfected patients, MRI-PDFF and FibroScan/CAP are highly accurate for the diagnosis of steatosis. The alanine aminotransferase level and APRI should be considered for the detection of NASH and fibrosis.

Background: Although the FibroTest has been validated as a biomarker to determine the stage of fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with results similar to those in chronic hepatitis C (CHC), B (CHB), and alcoholic liver disease (ALD), it has not yet been confirmed for the prediction of liver-related death., Aim: To validate the 10-year prognostic value of FibroTest in NAFLD for the prediction of liver-related death., Method: Patients in the prospective FibroFrance cohort who underwent a FibroTest between 1997 and 2012 were pre-included. Mortality status was obtained from physicians, hospitals or the national register. Survival analyses were based on univariate (Kaplan-Meier, log rank, AUROC) and multivariate Cox risk ratio taking into account age, sex and response to anti-viral treatment as covariates. The comparator was the performance of the FibroTest in CHC, the most validated population., Results: 7082 patients were included; 1079, 3449, 2051, and 503 with NAFLD, CHC, CHB, and ALD, respectively. Median (range) follow-up was 6.0 years (0.1-19.3). Ten year survival (95% CI) without liver-related death in patients with NAFLD was 0.956 (0.940-0.971; 38 events) and 0.832 (0.818-0.847; 226 events; P = 0.004) in CHC. The prognostic value (AUROC / Cox risk ratio) of FibroTest in patients with NAFLD was 0.941 (0.905-0.978)/1638 (342-7839) and even higher than in patients with CHC 0.875 (0.849-0.901; P = 0.01)/2657 (993-6586)., Conclusions: The FibroTest has a high prognostic value in NAFLD for the prediction of liver-related death. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01927133)., (© 2018 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Effective antiviral treatment (direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs)), the requirement for a fibrosis score to support DDA reimbursement and a screening strategy, such as the USA baby boomer campaign, should lead to an increased awareness of liver disease severity., Objective: To compare the awareness of liver disease severity between the USA and France, two countries with similar access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatments, similar rules for treatment reimbursement and similar availability of validated fibrosis tests, but with different policies, as France has no screening., Method: The global database of the FibroTest-ActiTest, including 1,085,657 subjects between 2002 and 2014, was retrospectively analysed. Awareness was defined as the test prescription rate and was compared between the USA and France, according to year of birth, gender and dates of DAA availability and screening campaign (2013-2014)., Results: In the USA 252,688 subjects were investigated for HCV, with a dramatic increase (138%) in the test rate in 2013-2014 (119,271) compared with 2011-2012 (50,031). In France 470,762 subjects were investigated (subjects with HCV and other disease) and the rates were stable. In USA 82.4% of subjects and in France 84.6% were classified as either the highest or lowest priority. The most striking difference was the higher test rate in women born between 1935 and 1944 in France 30,384/200,672 (15.1%) compared with the USA 8035/97,079 (8.3%) (OR=1.98 (95% CI 1.93 to 2.03) p<0.0001). This resulted in twice as many cases of cirrhosis being detected, 2.6% (5191/200,672 women) and 1.3% (1303/97,079), respectively, despite the same prevalence of cirrhosis in this age group (17.1% vs 16.2%) and without any clear explanation as to why they had not been included in the USA screening., Conclusions: This study highlighted in the USA the association between awareness of liver disease and both the HCV campaign and DAA availability. In comparison with France, there was a dramatically lower awareness of cirrhosis in the USA for women born between 1935 and 1944., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

Background & Aims: Many patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis also have diabetes, obesity, or insulin resistance-mediated steatosis, but little is known about how these disorders affect the severity of liver disease. We analyzed the prevalence and prognostic implications of metabolic risk factors (MRFs) such as overweight, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension in patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis awaiting liver transplants., Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 110 patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis (77% male; mean age, 55 y; 71% with >6 mo of abstinence) who received liver transplants at a single center in Paris, France, from 2000 through 2013. We collected data on previous exposure to MRFs, steatosis (>10% in the explant), and histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Results: HCC was detected in explants from 29 patients (26%). Steatosis was detected in explants from 47 patients (70% were abstinent for ≥6 mo); 50% had a history of overweight or type 2 diabetes. Fifty-two patients (47%) had a history of MRFs and therefore were at risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. A higher proportion of patients with MRF had HCC than those without MRF (46% vs 9%; P < .001). A previous history of overweight or type 2 diabetes significantly increased the risk for HCC (odds ratio, 6.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.47-15.76, and odds ratio, 4.63; 95% CI, 1.87-11.47, respectively; P < .001). MRF, but not steatosis, was associated with the development of HCC (odds ratio, 11.76; 95% CI, 2.60-53; P = .001) independent of age, sex, amount of alcohol intake, or severity of liver disease., Conclusions: Patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis who received transplants frequently also had nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. MRFs, particularly overweight, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, significantly increase the risk of HCC., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with cirrhosis resulting from chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are at risk of life-threatening complications, but consistently achieve lower sustained virological response (SVR) than patients without cirrhosis, especially if treatment has previously failed. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, with and without ribavirin., Methods: In this multicentre, double-blind trial, between Oct 21, 2013, and Oct 30, 2014, we enrolled patients with HCV genotype 1 and compensated cirrhosis who had not achieved SVR after successive treatments with pegylated interferon and protease-inhibitor regimens at 20 sites in France. With a computer-generated randomisation sequence, patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive placebo matched in appearance to study drugs for 12 weeks followed by once daily combination fixed-dose tablets of 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir plus weight-based ribavirin for 12 weeks, or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus placebo once daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was SVR 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12), for which 95% CIs were calculated with the Clopper-Pearson method. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01965535., Findings: Of 172 patients screened, 155 entered randomisation, 77 were assigned to receive ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin and 78 ledipasvir-sofosbuvir. 114 (74%) were men, 151 (97%), were white, 98 (63%) had HCV genotype 1a, and 145 (94%) had non-CC IL28B alleles. SVR12 rates were 96% (95% CI 89-99) for patients in the ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin group and 97% (91-100) in the ledipasvir-sofosbuvir group. One patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events while receiving only placebo. The most frequent adverse events were asthenia and headache, pruritus, and fatigue., Interpretation: Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks and ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 24 weeks provided similarly high SVR12 rates in previous non-responders with HCV genotype 1 and compensated cirrhosis. The shorter regimen, when given with ribavirin, might, therefore, be useful to treat treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis if longer-term treatment is not possible., Funding: Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: FibroTest and elastography have been validated as biomarkers of liver fibrosis in the most frequent chronic liver diseases and in the fibrosis screening of patients with diabetes. One challenge was to use them for estimating the prevalence of fibrosis, identifying independent risk factors and to propose screening strategies in the general population., Methods: We prospectively studied 7,463 consecutive subjects aged 40 years or older. Subjects with presumed advanced fibrosis (FibroTest greater than 0.48) were re-investigated in a tertiary center., Results: The sample characteristics were similar to those of the French population. FibroTest was interpretable in 99.6%. The prevalence of presumed fibrosis was 2.8%, (209/7,463), including cirrhosis in 0.3% (25/7,463); 105/209 (50%) subjects with presumed fibrosis accepted re-investigation. Fibrosis was confirmed in 50, still suspected in 27, indeterminate in 25 and not confirmed with false positive FibroTest or false negative elastography in 3 subjects. False negative rate of FibroTest estimated using elastography was 0.4% (3/766). The attributable causes for confirmed fibrosis were both alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in 66%, NAFLD in 13%, alcohol in 9%, HCV in 6%, and other in 6%. Factors independently associated (all P < 0.003) with confirmed fibrosis were age, male gender, waist circumference, HCV antibody and alcohol consumption estimated using carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, enabling efficient screening-oriented strategies to be compared and proposed., Conclusions: Biomarkers have permitted to estimate prevalence of advanced fibrosis around 2.8% in a general population aged 40 years or older, and several risk factors which may be used for the validation of selective or non-selective screening strategies.

Background: Few data are available on chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to compare the features and severity of CHC and the efficacy/safety of antiviral therapy in patients<65, between 65 and 80, and >80 yr old, and to determine the usefulness of biochemical markers (Fibrotest-Fibrosure/ActiTest [FT-AT]) in aged patients., Methods: This was a retrospective study with two groups of patients: Group 1: prospective cohort including all hepatitis C virus patients from our institution (N=4,182); Group 2: all consecutive patients who had FT-AT performed in France between 2002 and 2004 (N=33,738)., Results: A total of 6,865 patients>or=65 yr old was included (Group 1=881, Group 2=5,984). Group 1: patients>or=65 had a longer duration of and a higher age at infection, more genotype 1, and a history of transfusion (p<0.001). Among the 2,169 patients who underwent liver biopsy, bridging fibrosis (F2,F3,F4) was more frequent in patients>or=65 yr old, regardless of the duration of infection. In multivariate analysis, ages at biopsy and at infection were associated with F2,F3,F4. Discovery of CHC by a complication was more frequent in patients>or=65 yr (p<0.001). One hundred seventy patients>or=65 yr received antiviral therapy. A sustained virologic response was obtained in 45% of patients>or=65 yr treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin. Group 2: At FT, 58% of patients>80 yr, 37% of patients between 65 and 80 yr, and 14% of patients<65 yr (p<0.001) had cirrhosis. Patients>80 yr (43%) with cirrhosis had nonelevated alanine amino transferase (ALT), compared with 31% of patients<65 yr (p<0.001)., Conclusion: In patients>or=65 yr, CHC is more severe and presents with lower ALT than in younger patients. Treatment is effective. Biochemical markers seem particularly useful as a noninvasive alternative to liver biopsy in this population.