Search

Rationale: Limited data exist on the safety and effectiveness of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) and advanced lung disease. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of ETI in an unselected population of pwCF and advanced lung disease. Methods: A prospective observational study, including all adults aged 18 years and older with percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) ⩽ 40 who initiated ETI from December 2019 to June 2021 in France, was conducted. PwCF were followed until August 8, 2022. Results: ETI was initiated in 434 pwCF with a median ppFEV1 of 30 (interquartile range, 25–35), including 27 with severe cystic fibrosis liver disease and 183 with diabetes. PwCF were followed for a median of 587 (interquartile range, 396–728) days after ETI initiation. Discontinuation of ETI occurred in 12 (2.8%) pwCF and was due mostly to lung transplantation (n = 5) or death (n = 4). Absolute increase in ppFEV1 by a mean of +14.2% (95% confidence interval, 13.1–15.4%) occurred at 1 month and persisted throughout the study. Increase in ppFEV1 in the youngest age quartile was almost twice that of the oldest quartile (P < 0.001); body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2 was found in 38.6% at initiation versus 11.3% at 12 months (P = 0.0001). Increases in serum concentrations of vitamins A and E, but not 25-hydroxy vitamin D3, were observed. Significant reductions in the percentages of pwCF using oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation, nutritional support, and inhaled and systemic therapies (including antibiotics) were observed; insulin was discontinued in 12% of patients with diabetes. Conclusions: ETI is safe in pwCF and advanced lung disease, with multisystem pulmonary and extrapulmonary benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a rare genetic multisystemic disease, the manifestations of which are due to mutations in the gene encoding the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein and can lead to respiratory insufficiency and premature death. CFTR modulators, which were developed in the past decade, partially restore CFTR protein function. Their clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in phase 3 clinical trials, particularly in terms of lung function and pulmonary exacerbations, nutritional status, and quality of life in people with gating mutations (ivacaftor), homozygous for the F508del mutation (lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor), and in those with at least one F508del mutation (elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor). However, many questions remain regarding their long-term safety and effectiveness, particularly in patients with advanced lung disease, liver disease, renal insufficiency, or problematic bacterial colonization. The impact of CFTR modulators on other important outcomes such as concurrent treatments, lung transplantation, chest imaging, or pregnancies also warrants further investigation. The French CF Reference Network includes 47 CF centers that contribute patient data to the comprehensive French CF Registry and have conducted nationwide real-world studies on CFTR modulators. This review seeks to summarize the results of these real-world studies and examine their findings against those of randomized control trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor is a CFTR (cystic fibrosis [CF] transmembrane conductance regulator) modulator combination, developed for patients with CF with at least one Phe508del mutation. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of elexacaftor-tezacaftor- ivacaftor in patients with CF and advanced respiratory disease. Methods: A prospective observational study, including all patients aged ⩾12 years and with a percent-predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) <40 who initiated elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor from December 2019 to August 2020 in France was conducted. Clinical characteristics were collected at initiation and at 1 and 3 months. Safety and effectiveness were evaluated by September 2020. National-level transplantation and mortality figures for 2020 were obtained from the French CF and transplant centers and registries. Measurements and Main Results: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor- ivacaftor was initiated in 245 patients with a median (interquartile range) ppFEV1 = 29 (24-34). The mean (95% confidence interval) absolute increase in the ppFEV1 was +15.1 (+13.8 to +16.4; P < 0.0001), and the mean (95% confidence interval) in weight was +4.2 kg (+3.9 to +4.6; P < 0.0001). The number of patients requiring long-term oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, and/or enteral tube feeding decreased by 50%, 30%, and 50%, respectively (P < 0.01). Although 16 patients were on the transplant waiting list and 37 were undergoing transplantation evaluation at treatment initiation, only 2 received a transplant, and 1 died. By September 2020, only five patients were still on the transplantation path. Compared with the previous 2 years, a twofold decrease in the number of lung transplantations in patients with CF was observed in 2020, whereas the number of deaths without transplantation remained stable. Conclusions: In patients with advanced disease, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor is associated with rapid clinical improvement, often leading to the indication for lung transplantation being suspended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor has been approved in Europe for people with cystic fibrosis with at least one F508del CFTR variant. Additionally, it is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for people with cystic fibrosis with at least one of 177 rare variants. The aims of this study were to describe the clinical response to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for people with cystic fibrosis without a F508del CFTR variant in France and to determine CFTR variant responsiveness to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor based on the observed clinical response., Methods: The French compassionate programme expanded access to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor to people with cystic fibrosis, aged 6 years and older, without a F508del variant, excluding those with two variants previously characterised as non-responsive. Participants at France's 47 cystic fibrosis centres were given a 4-6 week trial of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor and response was determined by a centralised committee based on evolution of clinical data, lung function, and sweat chloride concentration. Responsiveness of individual CFTR variants was derived from observed clinical responses., Findings: The first compassionnate programme was launched on May 19, 2022; by March 8, 2024, 516 people with cystic fibrosis had been identified for inclusion in this real-word study: 37 were not included due to the presence of two variants previously characterised as non-responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 479 (229 females [48%] and 250 males [52%]) received elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for 4-6 weeks. Among 443 participants who received no CFTR modulator before elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 83 had at least one FDA-approved variant, of whom 81 (98%) were responders and continued elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor; in responders, mean absolute change in sweat chloride was -44·5 mmol/L (95% CI -39·1 to -49·8) and percentage of predicted FEV 1 (ppFEV 1 ) was 11·1 percentage points (95% CI 8·4 to 13·7; both comparisons p<0·0001). Among 360 participants with no FDA-approved variant and no previous CFTR modulator, 177 (49%) were responders; in responders, mean absolute change in sweat chloride was -20·5 mmol/L (-17·2 to -23·8) and ppFEV 1 was 13·2 percentage points (11·4 to 15·0; both comparisons p<0·0001). Among 36 participants who were receiving ivacaftor before elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 32 (89%) continued elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. Of 251 individual CFTR variants, 64 (28 FDA-approved) were classified as responsive or possibly responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 123 (two FDA-approved) as non-responsive or possibly non-responsive to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor., Interpretation: In France, over half of the population with cystic fibrosis without a F508del variant responded to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, with most responders having no FDA-approved variant. The treatment period was relatively short and further research is warranted to describe the long-term safety and effectiveness of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in this population., Funding: Association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose, Société Française de la Mucoviscidose, and Filière Maladies Rares MUCO-CFTR., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests P-RB declares consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed, MSD, Sanofi, Vertex, Viatris, and Zambon, outside of the submitted work. IS-G declares grants and consulting fees from Vertex, outside of the submitted work. ID declares support for attending meetings from Mylan and Zambon. CA declares consulting fees from Vertex and Viatris and support for attending meetings from SOS Oxygène, Viatris, and Zambon. DG declares support for attending meetings from Zambon. MM-E declares fees for report testimony from Vertex. MM declares consulting fees from Vertex. BD declares fees for participation on a data safety and monitoring board from Vertex. CR reports grants from Vaincre la Mucoviscidose and unpaid participation on the leadership of the French newborn screening programme and the French Rare Diseases Network. CM declares consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, and GSK, and support for attending meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and Chiesi. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Phase 3 trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of lumacaftor-ivacaftor (LUMA-IVA) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) homozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV 1 ) between 40 and 90. Marketing authorizations have been granted for patients at all levels of ppFEV 1 ., Methods: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LUMA-IVA over the first year of treatment in patients with ppFEV 1 <40 or ppFEV 1 ≥90 in comparison with those with ppFEV 1 [40-90[. Analysis of data collected during a real world study, which included all patients aged ≥12 years who started LUMA-IVA in 2016 across all 47 French CF centers., Results: 827 patients were classified into 3 subgroups according to ppFEV 1 at treatment initiation (ppFEV 1 <40, n = 121; ppFEV 1 [40-90[, n = 609; ppFEV 1 ≥90, n = 97). Treatment discontinuation rate was higher in ppFEV 1 <40 patients (28.9%) than in those with ppFEV 1 [40-90[(16.4%) or ppFEV 1 ≥90 (17.5%). In patients with uninterrupted treatment, significant increase in ppFEV 1 occurred in the ppFEV 1 [40-90[subgroup (+2.9%, P<0.001), and in those ppFEV 1 <40 (+0.5%, P = 0.03) but not in those with ppFEV 1 ≥90 (P = 0.46). Compared with the year prior to initiation, the number of days of intravenous antibiotics were reduced in all subgroups, although 72% of patients with ppFEV 1 <40 still experienced at least one exacerbation/year under LUMA-IVA. Comparable increase in body mass index was seen in the three subgroups., Conclusion: Phe508del homozygous CF patients benefit from LUMA-IVA at all levels of baseline lung function , but the characteristics and magnitude of the response vary depending on ppFEV 1 at baseline., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the work submitted for publication., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)