Search

Thirty-one selected patients with various haematological malignancies who received a 10 Gy-4 h total body irradiation (TBI) at the Institut Gustave Roussy 24 h before high dose cyclophosphamide for bone marrow transplantation, were prospectively evaluated for gastrointestinal symptoms, body temperature, consciousness, headache, xerostomia, parotiditis, ocular symptoms, blood pressure, and respiratory and cutaneous signs for 24 h. In spite of prophylactic administration of various anti-emetic agents, 90% of the patients experienced nausea and 80% experienced vomiting. An almost constant body temperature peak--up to 40.8 degrees C--was registered 6 h after the start of irradiation. No drowsiness was reported since the introduction of the new anti-emetic agent Ondansetron. Nearly half the patients (42%) complained of headache. The proportion of patients experiencing early (during TBI) xerostomia was 61%. 74% of patients complained of parotiditis in the first 24 h. Although this low dose rate whole body irradiation is not likely to be exactly replicated in many accidental human exposures, the incidence rate and the time-course of the observed prodromal phase symptoms may prove helpful for early triage in the case of accidental irradiation.

Thyroid morphological and functional tests were carried out on 396 patients who were recalled because their thyroid gland had been exposed during hemangioma irradiation in childhood 11-43 years before (median, 22 years). The irradiations have been classified into two categories based on their duration: short duration, from a few seconds to a few minutes (90S and X rays), and long duration, from 30 min to several hours (336Ra, 192Ir, and 32P). The risk of a thyroid nodule increased significantly with the total dose received by the thyroid; it was linked to the dose delivered in the short duration (excess relative risk per Gy = 10), but not to that delivered in the long duration. The risk of a simple diffuse goiter, which also increased with the dose received by the thyroid, did not depend on the duration of the irradiation. In conclusion, this study emphasizes the role of the dose rate in the risk of thyroid nodule, the detection of which does not appear to be improved by plasma thyroid marker determination.

Between 1954 and 1983, 7620 patients were treated for breast carcinoma at Institut Gustave Roussy (France). Of these patients, 6919 were followed for at least 1 year. Out of these, 11 presented with sarcomas thought to be induced by irradiation, 2 of which were Steward-Treves Syndrome, and 9 of which were sarcomas within the irradiated fields. All histological slides were reviewed and a comparison with those of breast cancer was done. The sites of these sarcomas were: parietal wall, 1 case; second costal cartilage, 1 case; infraclavicular region, 1 case; supraclavicular region, 2 cases; internal third of the clavicle, 2 cases; axillary region 2 cases; and the internal side of the upper arm (Stewart-Treves syndrome), 2 cases. The median age of these 11 patients at the diagnosis of sarcomas was 65.8 (49-83). The mean latent period was 9.5 years (4-24). Three patients underwent radical mastectomy and nine modified radical mastectomy. Only one patient received chemotherapy. The radiation doses received at the site of the sarcoma were 45 Gy/18 fr. for 10 cases and 90-100 Gy for 1 case (due to overlapping between two fields). The histology was as follows: malignant fibrous histiocytoma, 5 cases; fibrosarcoma, 3 cases; lymphangiosarcoma, 2 cases; and osteochondrosarcoma, 1 case. The median survival following diagnosis of sarcoma was 2.4 years (4 months-9 years). Two patients are still alive: one with recurrence of her breast cancer, the other in complete remission, with 7 and 3 years follow-up, respectively. All other patients died from their sarcomas. The cumulative incidence of sarcoma following irradiation of breast cancer was 0.2% (0.09-0.47) at 10 years. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of sarcoma (observed n# of cases (Obs)/expected n# of cases (Exp) computed from the Danish Cancer Registry for the same period) was 1.81 (CI 0.91-3.23). This is significantly higher than one, with a p = 0.03 (One Tailed Exact Test). The mean annual excess (Obs-Exp)/100.000 person-years at risk during the same period/(100,000) was 9.92. This study suggests that patients treated by radiation for breast cancer have a risk of subsequent sarcomas that is higher than the general population. However, the benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer exceeds the risk of second cancer; therefore, the potential of radiation-induced sarcomas should not be a factor in the selection of treatment for patients with breast cancer.