1. Antifungal susceptibility testing practices in mycology laboratories in France, 2018.
- Author
-
Bellanger AP, Persat F, Foulet F, Bonnal C, Accoceberry I, Angebault C, Angoulvant A, Augereau O, Bailly E, Bert F, Bonhomme J, Bouchara JP, Bougnoux ME, Bourdeau P, Bouteille B, Brun S, Brunet K, Camin-Ravenne AM, Cassaing S, Chouaki T, Cornet M, Costa D, Desbois N, Dorin J, Fekkar A, Fiacre A, Fréalle E, Gangneux JP, Guillot J, Guitard J, Hasseine L, Huguenin A, Lachaud L, Larréché S, Lavergne RA, Le Gal S, Le Govic Y, Letscher-Bru V, Machouart M, Mazars E, Nourrisson C, Paugam A, Ranque S, Risco-Castillo V, Sasso M, Sautour M, Sendid B, Senghor Y, Botterel F, and Dannaoui E
- Subjects
- Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests methods, Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests standards, Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests statistics & numerical data, Drug Resistance, Fungal, France, History, 21st Century, Humans, Laboratory Proficiency Testing methods, Laboratory Proficiency Testing statistics & numerical data, Professional Practice standards, Quality Control, Surveys and Questionnaires, Antifungal Agents therapeutic use, Laboratories standards, Laboratories statistics & numerical data, Microbial Sensitivity Tests methods, Microbial Sensitivity Tests standards, Microbial Sensitivity Tests statistics & numerical data, Mycology history, Mycology methods, Mycology standards, Mycology statistics & numerical data, Professional Practice statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
A survey of mycology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) was undertaken in France in 2018, to better understand the difference in practices between the participating centers and to identify the difficulties they may encounter as well as eventual gaps with published standards and guidelines. The survey captured information from 45 mycology laboratories in France on how they perform AFST (number of strains tested, preferred method, technical and quality aspects, interpretation of the MIC values, reading and interpretation difficulties). Results indicated that 86% of respondents used Etest as AFST method, with a combination of one to seven antifungal agents tested. Most of the participating laboratories used similar technical parameters to perform their AFST method and a large majority used, as recommended, internal and external quality assessments. Almost all the participating mycology laboratories (98%) reported difficulties to interpret the MIC values, especially when no clinical breakpoints are available. The survey highlighted that the current AFST practices in France need homogenization, particularly for MIC reading and interpretation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF