1. Differences in Survival across Monogenic Forms of Parkinson's Disease.
- Author
-
Lanore, Aymeric, Casse, Fanny, Tesson, Christelle, Courtin, Thomas, Menon, Poornima Jayadev, Sambin, Sara, Mangone, Graziella, Mariani, Louise‐Laure, Lesage, Suzanne, Brice, Alexis, Elbaz, Alexis, Corvol, Jean‐Christophe, Agid, Yves, Anheim, Mathieu, Borg, Michel, Broussolle, Emmanuel, Damier, Philippe, Defebvre, Luc, Dürr, Alexandra, and Durif, Franck
- Subjects
PARKINSON'S disease ,GENETIC counseling ,DARDARIN ,OVERALL survival ,VITAL records (Births, deaths, etc.) ,MOVEMENT disorders - Abstract
Objective: Survival of patients with monogenic Parkinson's disease may depend on the causative genes associated with the disease. In this study, we compare survival of patients with Parkinson's disease according to the presence of SNCA, PRKN, LRRK2, or GBA mutations. Methods: Data from the French Parkinson Disease Genetics national multicenter cohort study were used. Patients with sporadic and familial Parkinson's disease were recruited between 1990 and 2021. Patients were genotyped for the presence of mutations in the SNCA, PRKN, LRRK2, or GBA genes. Vital status was collected from the National death register for participants born in France. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Of the 2,037 patients with Parkinson's disease, 889 had died after a follow‐up of up to 30 years. Patients with PRKN (n = 100, HR = 0.41; p = 0.001) and LRRK2 mutations (n = 51, HR = 0.49; p = 0.023) had longer survival than those without any mutation, whereas patients with SNCA (n = 20, HR = 9.88; p < 0.001) or GBA mutations (n = 173, HR = 1.33; p = 0.048) had shorter survival. Interpretation: Survival differs across genetic forms of Parkinson's disease, with higher mortality for patients with SNCA or GBA mutations, and lower mortality for those with PRKN or LRRK2 mutations. Differences in severity and disease progression among monogenic forms of Parkinson's disease likely explain these findings, which has important consequences for genetic counselling and choice of end points for future clinical trials for targeted therapies. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:123–132 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF