Search

Abstract: Purpose: To present the national survey patterns in France for breast cancer brachytherapy in 2009. Material and method: A written questionnaire was sent to the academic and general hospitals and the anticancer centres. The different items were type of institution; breast cancer clinical trial participation; number of breast brachytherapy per year; its indications; material and dose rate used. Results: Among the 76 sent questionnaires, 35 (46 %) answers were available: 9 % of academic hospitals and 50 % of cancer centres performed breast brachytherapy. The number of breast brachytherapy per year ranged between 300 and 350. The indications were boost (100 %), partial breast irradiation (20 %) and second conservative treatment for local recurrence (53 %). The implanted material consisted in needles (27 %) and plastic tubes (73 %). The dose rate was low (50 %), pulsed (25 %) and high (25 %). Conclusion: Breast brachytherapy appears as a validated technique in case of boost but remains under investigation for partial breast irradiation and second conservative treatments. Good clinical practice rules as well as technical and dosimetric guidelines are needed. A cost-effective analysis of breast brachytherapy is warranted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Ductal carcinoma in situ is defined as breast cancer confined to the ducts of the breast without evidence of penetration of the basement membrane. Local treatment quality represents one of the most prognostic factors as half of recurrences are invasive diseases. The main goal of adjuvant radiotherapy after conservative surgery is to decrease local recurrences and to permit breast conservation with low treatment-induced sequelae. Several randomized trials have established the impact of 50Gy to the whole breast in terms of local control. Nevertheless, no randomized trial is still available concerning the role of the boost in this disease. In this review, we present updated results of the literature and we detail the French multicentric randomized trial evaluating the impact of a 16Gy boost after 50Gy delivered to the whole breast in 25 fractions and 33 days. This protocol will start inclusions in October 2008. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy boost (ISBT) after EBRT or radio chemotherapy for the treatment of anal canal cancers., Methods and Materials: One hundred patients with anal canal cancers were treated at our institution by ISBT [LDR (n = 50); HDR (n = 50)]. Chronic toxicity rates, local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival of the two different dose-rate brachytherapy modalities were analyzed and compared., Results: With a median followup of 42.2 months (95% CI, [34.5-48.8]), 9 (9% [4.8-16.2%]) local recurrences were observed, 4 (8% [3.2-18.8%]) in LDR vs. 5 (10% [4.4-21.4%]) in HDR group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28 [0.32-5.07], p = 0.73). The 5-year rate of local control for the entire population was 90% [81-95%], 93% [79-98%] vs. 86% [69-94%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.38). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for all patients was 82% [71-90%], 88% [73-95%] vs. 72% [44-88%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.21). The 5-year overall survival rate for global population was 94% [84-98%], with no significant differences between LDR (97% [79-100%]) and HDR (93% [80-98%]) (p = 0.27). The 5-year colostomy-free survival rate was 92% [83-96%], respectively, 95% [83-99%] vs. 86% [69-94%] for LDR and HDR (p = 0.21). Significant differences were found in terms of chronic toxicity rates, with 28 (56% [42.3-68.8%]) patients concerned in low-dose-rate brachytherapy vs. 17 (34% [22.4-47.9%]) in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (OR = 0.40 [0.18-0.91], p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Local recurrence rates were comparable between both groups; HDR brachytherapy seem to have a better toxicity profile. Our data confirmed the finding that HDR can be used to safely administer ISBT without increasing chronic toxicity., (Copyright © 2019 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)