Search

The objective of this study was to compare the mental well-being of French women who were and were not pregnant during the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. We performed a nationwide online quantitative survey including all women between 18 and 45 years of age during the second and third weeks of global lockdown (25 March–7 April 2020). The main outcome measure was mental well-being measured by the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). This study analysed 275 responses from pregnant women and compared them with those from a propensity score–matched sample of 825 non-pregnant women. In this French sample, the median WEMWBS score was 49.0 and did not differ by pregnancy status. Women living in urban areas reported better well-being, while those with sleep disorders or who spent more than an hour a day watching the news reported poorer well-being. During the first lockdown in France, women had relatively low mental well-being scores, with no significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant women. More than ever, health-care workers need to find a way to maintain their support for women's well-being. Minor daily annoyances of pregnancy, such as insomnia, should not be trivialised because they are a potential sign of poor well-being. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pregnancy and perinatal periods are significant risk factors of intimate partner violence (IPV), a major public health problem that could begin or intensify during these periods. Perinatal care providers have a major role in the identification and the management of IPV. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt into French the Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS) tool, a reliable instrument to assess the knowledge, attitudes and preparedness to address IPV, and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods: The PREMIS was cross-culturally adapted by conducting forward and backward translations, following international guidelines. An online cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the PREMIS-French in perinatal care providers: data completeness, factor analysis, score distribution, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, item-total correlations, inter-subscale correlations and test-retest reliability. Results: The PREMIS was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted to the context of metropolitan France. The results obtained from 360 perinatal care providers showed good acceptability. Exploratory factor analysis of the "Opinions" items resulted in a six-factor solution with six of the eight subscales of the original structure identified. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.54 to 0.97) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.46 to 0.92) for the "Background" and "Opinions" subscales were found. Discussion: This study provides evidence of the good psychometric properties of the PREMIS-French. This valid instrument will help to understand perinatal care providers' barriers to IPV screening and management and will help to focus on specific lacks of knowledge for developing IPV education programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The principal objective of this study was to describe the policies reported by French maternity units for the prevention and early management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). The second objective was to assess their variation according to hospital level and status.Study Design: Cross-sectional observational study of French maternity units, from January 2010 to April 2011. The medical supervisor (obstetrician or midwife) of participating maternity wards completed a questionnaire designed to ascertain the unit's protocol for preventing and managing PPH after both vaginal and caesarean deliveries at a gestational age >22 weeks (or a birth weight >500g). The main outcome measure was the percentage of units reporting protocols adhering to the principal criteria for adequate management defined by the 2004 French guidelines for PPH.Results: 252 maternity units participated in the survey. Almost all units had a written protocol for PPH (97.2%). For vaginal deliveries, 82.5% of units had a definition of PPH (>500ml) and 92.8% had a policy of preventive oxytocin use. For caesareans, only 23.8% defined PPH (as >1000ml), 68.8% used manual delivery of the placenta, and 76.9% recommended oxytocin injection immediately after the birth. The first-line medication for PPH was oxytocin (96.3%) and the second-line treatment a prostaglandin (97.5%). Level III maternity units had a definition of haemorrhage for vaginal deliveries more often than did other levels of care (P=0.04). Manual removal of the placenta after caesareans was significantly more frequent in level I than level III units (P=0.008) and in private than other types of maternity units. Medical management of haemorrhage did not differ according to level of care or maternity status.Conclusions: The responses by maternity unit supervisors showed significant improvement in the management of PPH accordingly to the 2004 French guidelines, especially for the third stage of labour. This improvement did not differ between hospitals by levels of care or legal status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The main aim of this article was to analyze short-term variation (STV) of the fetal heart rate according to maternal race. The secondary aim was to study the baseline fetal heart rate according to this factor.Study Design: This single-center historical cohort study covered the period from November 2008 through December 2011 (n=182). The inclusion criteria were: black women from sub-Saharan Africa or white European women, with a singleton pregnancy ≥34 weeks and fetal heart rate recorded by computerized analysis (Oxford Sonicaid System 8002) at a prenatal visit. The exclusion criteria were: medication likely to modify fetal heart rate, abnormal fetal heart rate tracing, and being in labor. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to study the association between maternal race and STV.Results: STV was lower by 2.6ms in fetuses of black women (n=55) compared to those of white women (n=127) (8.9±2.1ms vs. 11.4±3.4ms) (p<0.001). The basal fetal heart rate was higher (p=0.001), and the recording criteria were met less often for the black women (p=0.04). After adjustment for maternal age, body mass index at the beginning of pregnancy, maternal cigarette smoking, parity, gestational diabetes, gestational age at the time of the fetal heart rate recording, and the time between the last meal and the recording, mean STV was lower by 3.1±0.6ms in fetuses of black compared with white women (p<0.001).Conclusion: STV is lower in fetuses of black women compared to those of white women in a low-risk population. A study of black and white women with high-risk pregnancies is necessary to assess the impact of medical practices on perinatal outcome after STV analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the feasibility and relevancy of a systematic data collection process in characterizing factors influencing research acceptability through women during pregnancy and early postpartum., Methods: A pilot prospective observational crossover unicentric study was conducted in Est France. All the women (except language barrier and intensive care transfer) were called upon to complete a survey (33 questions). The primary endpoints were the participation rate and the completeness of the information. The secondary endpoint was the participants' sociodemographic background and preferences regarding research (bivariate analysis, P value <0.20)., Results: Within the research period (February 23-March 8, 114 childbirths), 105 women fitting the criteria were called upon for the survey. The participation rate and completeness were high. The participation rate was 93% with six lost to follow-up, and one refusal. The global filling rate was 95%. We highlighted two plausible variables of interests for research participation: women age older (P value 0.119) and level of education (P value 0.176). A sufficient cooling-off period, the commitment of women's health providers, and the possibility to accede research results might favor women's involvement. Acceptability would appear to be decreasing when the protocol implied fetal or neonatal data collection (compared to maternal data), unless research led to a better therapeutic option., Conclusion: The data collection process is highly feasible and provide consistent data. Larger-scale output obtention should enhance the conception and rollout of projects, first by calculating sample size based on potentials for recruitments adjusted to populations, characteristics and second by fitting the experimental design to women's expectations., (© 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Objectives: The principal objective of this work was to assess how well the written protocols of maternity units used for the prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) corresponded to the 2004 French guidelines on this topic. The second objective was to assess whether or not this correspondence with the national guidelines varied according to hospital level (basic, specialized, and subspecialized) and status (teaching, public, and private)., Methods: This observational multicenter cross-sectional study took place in September 2010 and included French perinatal networks that volunteered to participate. We asked 300 French maternity units belonging to these networks to participate by emailing a copy of their department's protocol for PPH to the study team. This team designed and performed a clinical audit of these protocols, defining 16 criteria that incorporated the 2004 French guidelines for prevention and management of PPH. The main outcome measure was the percentage of units reporting protocols meeting these criteria., Results: Of the 244 maternity units responding, 97.1 % had a written protocol but only 67.0 % had a local protocol. Protocol correspondence with the 2004 French guidelines was good for the criteria involving quantitative assessment of the quantity of blood loss (83.5 %) and secondary management of PPH (>80 %). Correspondence with the guidelines was poor in terms of defining PPH in the protocol (25.3 %) and of requiring the recording of the time of PPH diagnosis (53.2 %) and of the volume of blood loss (55.7 %). These results differed only slightly according to maternity unit status or level., Conclusion: In all, 67.0 % (159/237) of maternity units had a local protocol for PPH. The contents of these protocols should be improved to be closer to the national guidelines., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors has any conflict of interest concerning the topic or contents of this article., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of directed open-glottis and directed closed-glottis pushing., Design: Pragmatic, randomised, controlled, non-blinded superiority study., Settings: Four French hospitals between July 2015 and June 2017 (2 academic hospitals and 2 general hospitals)., Participants: 250 women in labour who had undergone standardised training in the two types of pushing with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation at term (≥37 weeks) were included by midwives and randomised; 125 were allocated to each group. The exclusion criteria were previous caesarean birth or fetal heart rate anomaly. Participants were randomised during labour, after a cervical dilation ≥ 7 cm., Interventions: In the intervention group, open-glottis pushing was defined as a prolonged exhalation contracting the abdominal muscles (pulling the stomach in) to help move the fetus down the birth canal. Closed-glottis pushing was defined as Valsalva pushing., Measurements: The principal outcome was "effectiveness of pushing" defined as a spontaneous birth without any episiotomy, second-, third-, or fourth-degree perineal lesion. The results in our intention-to-treat analysis are reported as crude relative risks (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals. A multivariable analysis was used to take the relevant prognostic and confounding factors into account and obtain an adjusted relative risk (aRR)., Findings: In our intention-to-treat analysis, most characteristics were similar across groups including epidural analgesia (>95% in each group). The mean duration of the expulsion phase was longer among the open-glottis group (24.4 min ± 17.4 vs. 18.0 min ± 15.0, p=0.002). The two groups did not appear to differ in the effectiveness of their pushing (48.0% in the open-glottis group versus 55.2% in the closed-glottis group, for an adjusted relative risk (aRR) of 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.14) or in their risk of instrumental birth (aRR 0.97, 95%CI 0.85-1.10)., Key Conclusions: In maternity units with a high rate of epidural analgesia, the effectiveness of the type of directed pushing does not appear to differ between the open- and closed-glottis groups., Implications for Practice: If directed pushing is necessary, women should be able to choose the type of directed pushing they prefer to use during birth. Professionals must therefore be trained in both types so that they can adequately support women as they give birth., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In the context of the stage 3 SARS-Cov-2 epidemic situation, it is necessary to put forward a method of rapid response for an HAS position statement in order to answer to the requests from the French Ministry of Solidarity and Health, healthcare professionals and/or health system users' associations concerning follow-up of pregnant women during the COVID-19 outbreak., Methods: A simplified 7-step process that favours HAS collaboration with experts (healthcare professionals, health system users' associations, scientific societies etc.), the restrictive selection of available evidence and the use of digital means of communication. A short and specific dissemination format, which can be quickly updated in view of the changes in available data has been chosen., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests, (© 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In the context of the stage 3 SARS-Cov-2 epidemic situation, it is necessary to put forward a method of rapid response for an HAS position statement in order to answer to the requests from the French Ministry of Solidarity and Health, healthcare professionals and/or health system users' associations, concerning post-natal follow-up for women and neonates during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: A simplified 7-step process that favours HAS collaboration with experts (healthcare professionals, health system users' associations, scientific societies etc.), the restrictive selection of available evidence and the use of digital means of communication. A short and specific dissemination format, which can be quickly updated in view of the changes in available data has been chosen., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests, (© 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)