Search

As technology becomes more sophisticated in healthcare, there is increasing need to measure its impact on key quality indicators, such as error reduction, patient safety, and cost-benefit ratios. When a product is designed to decrease medical errors, the baseline error rate must be determined before implementation to accurately measure the impact. Given the opportunity to adopt a technology that would eliminate the need to manually document vital signs, a large Florida hospital decided to measure the current process and error rate of vital signs documentation. University Community Hospital in Tampa, Fla., designed a two-phase study to evaluate this process. Phase I of the study evaluated errors in the electronic medical record and traditional manual documentation. The results demonstrate that use of an EMR can reduce vital sign documentation errors by more than half compared with traditional manual documentation in paper charts. Researchers found the error rate for electronic vital signs documentation to be less than 5 percent, compared with the paper chart error rate of 10 percent.

Background: One of the possible assumptions for the higher mortality from cancer of blacks versus whites is that blacks tend to be diagnosed relatively more often with later stage disease. This study examined the stages at diagnosis for female breast cancer and other gynecologic cancers among blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanic whites., Methods: Data for Dade County were analyzed in this study, which was based on the tumor registry data from the Florida Cancer Data System from 1981-1989. The stages at diagnosis were classified as in situ, local, regional, and distant according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology coding rules., Results: The percentage of early stage diagnoses (in situ and local stage) was significantly lower among blacks and Hispanic whites than among non-Hispanic whites, but only for breast and cervical cancer. There was a significant increase in the percentage of early stage diagnoses of breast cancer among all three groups during 1981-1989, whereas this increase was found only in Hispanic whites for cervical cancer. The percentage of in situ cervical cancers was much lower in women older than age 45, especially among women older than age 65, in all three groups., Conclusions: These data suggest that screening programs need to be targeted differently for specific age and ethnic groups.

Background: Cancer incidence varies among race and ethnic subgroups. Relatively little information exists on cancer among Hispanics, and none of it it stratified by race., Methods: To explore and compare cancer incidence rates of each site of cancer among white Hispanic, white non-Hispanic, black Hispanic, and black non-Hispanic women in Dade County, South Florida, we accessed 9 years of cancer incidence data. Dade County's Hispanic population is the second largest of any US county. For each site, incidence rates, rate ratios, and 95% confidence intervals are presented., Results: Among white Hispanics, there were statistically significant lower rates of cancers of the oral cavity, esophagus, colon, pancreas, lung, breast, ovary, bladder, kidney, melanoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma than among white non-Hispanics. Black Hispanics had significantly lower rates of cancers of the oral cavity, stomach, rectum, lung, cervix, and bladder than black non-Hispanics. However, white Hispanic women had significantly higher rates of cancers of the liver, gallbladder, and uterine cervix than white non-Hispanic women. No in situ breast cancer cases among blacks of either ethnic subgroup was found., Conclusion: Both white Hispanic and black Hispanic women generally had lower rates of cancer than their race-specific non-Hispanic counterparts. However, incidence rates among Hispanics differ substantially by race; failure to distinguish them may lead to erroneous conclusions.

Background: Dade County (Florida) is the largest county in the United States in which a majority of the population is Hispanic. To describe and compare cancer incidence among white and black Hispanic and non-Hispanic males in South Florida and to identify those sites showing important racial-ethnic differences between sub-groups, incidence rates were determined from 9 years of prospective population-based cancer surveillance data., Methods: All incident cancer cases diagnosed among male residents of Dade County for the period January 1, 1981, through December 31, 1989, were obtained from the statewide tumor registry for Florida, the Florida Cancer Data System. Race- and ethnic-specific age-standardized incidence rates and standardized rate ratios to compare rates among racial-ethnic subgroups for each site are presented., Results: Compared with white non-Hispanics, white Hispanic males had significantly higher rates of cancers of the liver, gallbladder, nasal cavity, penis, and thyroid; acute lymphocytic leukemia; and Kaposi's sarcoma. Significantly lower rates were found for cancers of the esophagus, stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, lung, testes, bladder, and kidney, and for mesothelioma, melanoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Black Hispanics had significantly lower rates only of cancers of the esophagus, lung, and prostate than did black non-Hispanics., Conclusion: Differences were found in incidence rates by race-ethnicity; while incidence rates for most sites among white Hispanic males were lower than among white non-Hispanics, higher rates for several sites are of particular concern and merit further investigation to determine differences in risk factors and exposures.