Search

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate changes over time in cause of death and making end-of-life decisions in preterm infants. Methods: A follow-back survey was conducted of all preterm infants who died between September 2016 and December 2017 in Flanders and Brussels, Belgium. Cause of death was obtained from the death certificate and information on end-of-life decisions (ELDs) through an anonymous questionnaire of the certifying physician. Results were compared with a previous study performed between August 1999 and July 2000. Results: In the cohort 1999-2000 and 2016-2017, respectively, 150 and 135 deaths were included. A significantly higher proportion of infants born before 26 weeks of gestation was found in the 2016-2017 cohort (53% vs. 24% in 1999-2000, p < 0.001). Extreme immaturity (<26 weeks) remained the most prevalent cause with a significant increase in the 2016-2017 cohort (48% vs. 28% in 1999-2000, p < 0.001). The overall prevalence of ELDs was similar across study periods (61%). Non-treatment decisions remained the most common ELD (36% and 37%). Conclusion: Infants born at the limits of viability have become more prevalent among infant deaths, possibly due to a change in attitude towards periviable births. Neither the process of making ELDs nor the cause of death has changed over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of analgesics and sedatives to alleviate pain and discomfort is common in end-of-life care in neonates and infants. However, to what extent those drugs are used in that context with the specific aim of bringing the infant in a state of continuous deep sedation (CDS) is currently unknown. Methods: We performed a nationwide mortality follow-back survey based on all deaths under the age of 1 over a period of 16 months in Flanders, Belgium. Data on CDS were linked to sociodemographic information from death certificates. Physicians completed an anonymous questionnaire. Questions measured whether CDS preceded death, and which clinical characteristics were associated with the sedation (e.g., type of drugs used and the duration of sedation). Results: The response rate was 83% (229/276). In 39% of all deceased neonates and infants, death was preceded by CDS. Physicians used a combination of morphine and benzodiazepines in 53%, or morphine alone in 45% of all sedation cases in order to continuously and deeply sedate the infant. In 89% of cases, death occurred within 1 week after sedation was begun, and in 92% of cases, artificial nutrition and hydration were administered until death. In 49% of cases there was no intention to hasten death, and in 40% of cases, the possibility of hastening was taken into account. Conclusions: CDS precedes about 2 in 5 neonatal and infant deaths. Guidelines for CDS in this age group are non-existent and it is unclear whether the same recommendations as in the adult population apply and can be considered a good practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Perinatal death is often preceded by an end-of-life decision (ELD). Disparate hospital policies, complex legal frameworks and ethically difficult cases make attitudes important. This study investigated attitudes of neonatologists and nurses towards perinatal ELDs.Methods: A survey was handed out to all neonatologists and neonatal nurses in all eight neonatal intensive care units in Flanders, Belgium in May 2017. Respondents indicated agreement with statements regarding perinatal ELDs on a Likert-scale and sent back questionnaires via mail.Results: The response rate was 49.5% (302/610). Most neonatologists and nurses found nontreatment decisions such as withholding or withdrawing treatment acceptable (90-100%). Termination of pregnancy when the foetus is viable in cases of severe or lethal foetal problems was considered highly acceptable in both groups (80-98%). Physicians and nurses do not find different ELDs equally acceptable, e.g. nurses more often than physicians (74% vs 60%, p = 0.017) agree that it is acceptable in certain cases to administer medication with the explicit intention of hastening death.Conclusion: There was considerable support for both prenatal and neonatal ELDs, even for decisions that currently fall outside the Belgian legal framework. Differences between neonatologists' and nurses' attitudes indicate that both opinions should be heard during ELD-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Making end-of-life decisions (ELDs) in neonates involves ethically difficult and distressing dilemmas for health care providers. Insight into which factors complicate or facilitate this decision-making process could be a necessary first step in formulating recommendations to aid future practice.Objectives: This study aimed to identify barriers to and facilitators of the ELD-making process as perceived by neonatologists and nurses.Methods: We conducted semistructured face-to-face interviews with 15 neonatologists and 15 neonatal nurses, recruited through four neonatal intensive care units in Flanders, Belgium. They were asked what factors had facilitated and complicated previous ELD-making processes. Two researchers independently analyzed the data, using thematic content analysis to extract and summarize barriers and facilitators.Results: Barriers and facilitators were found at three distinct levels: the case-specific context (e.g., uncertainty of the diagnosis and specific characteristics of the child, parents, and health care providers, which make decision making more difficult), decision-making process (e.g., multidisciplinary consultations and advance care planning, which make decision making easier), and overarching structure (e.g., lack of privacy and complex legislation making decision making more challenging).Conclusion: Barriers and facilitators found in this study can lead to recommendations, some simpler to implement than others, to aid the complex ELD-making process. Recommendations include establishing regular multidisciplinary meetings to include all health care providers and reduce unnecessary uncertainty, routinely implementing advance care planning in severely ill neonates to make important decisions beforehand, creating privacy for bad-news conversations with parents, and reviewing the complex legal framework of perinatal ELD making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]