Search

Background: Research on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is crucial for developing comprehensive palliative care in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Objectives: To study IPF patients' HRQoL compared with general population and its association with dyspnea in a longitudinal follow-up. Design: Assessment of IPF patients' HRQoL by a generic tool. Comparison of baseline data with the general population and a 30-month follow-up with 6 months intervals. Setting/Subjects: In total, 246 IPF patients were recruited from the Finnish nationwide real-life study, FinnishIPF. Measurements: Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scale for dyspnea and the generic HRQoL tool 15D for the total and dimensional HRQoL were used. Results: At baseline, the mean 15D total score was lower (0.786, standard deviation [SD] 0.116) in IPF patients than in the general population (0.871, SD 0.043) (p < 0.001) and among the IPF patients with MMRC ≥2 compared with those with MMRC <2 (p < 0.001). In patients with MMRC ≥2, significant impairment compared with general population existed in 11 dimensions of HRQoL, such as breathing, usual activities, and sexual activity, whereas this was true in only 4 dimensions in MMRC <2 category. Mental function was not impaired in either group. During the follow-up, 15D total score decreased in both MMRC categories (p < 0.001) but stayed constantly worse in the MMRC ≥2 group. Seven and two dimensions of HRQoL significantly declined in the categories of MMRC <2 and MMRC ≥2, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with IPF, especially if dyspnea limits everyday life, suffer from widely impaired HRQoL, although self-assessed mental capability is preserved. Integrated palliative care is supported to face the multiple needs of IPF patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several markers have been identified to increase the risk for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) or mortality related to AE-ILD. However, less is known about the risk predictors of ILD patients who have survived AE. The aim of the study was to characterise AE-ILD survivors and investigate prognostic factors in this subpopulation. Methods: All AE-ILD patients (n = 95) who had been discharged alive from two hospitals located in Northern Finland were selected from a population of 128 AE-ILD patients. Clinical data related to the hospital treatment and six-month follow-up visit were collected retrospectively from medical records. Results: Fifty-three patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and 42 patients with other ILD were identified. Two thirds of the patients had been treated without invasive or non-invasive ventilation support. The clinical features of six-month survivors (n = 65) and non-survivors (n = 30) did not differ in terms of medical treatment or oxygen requirements. Of the patients, 82.5% used corticosteroids at the six-month follow-up visit. Fifty-two patients experienced at least one non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation before the six-month follow-up visit. In a univariate model, IPF diagnosis, high age and a non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation increased the risk of death, although re-hospitalisation was the only independent risk factor in a multivariate model. In six-month survivors, there was no statistically significant decrease in pulmonary function test results (PFT) examined at the follow-up visit compared with earlier PFT examined near the time of AE-ILD. Conclusions: The AE-ILD survivors were a heterogeneous group of patients both clinically and in terms of their outcome. A non-elective respiratory re-hospitalisation was identified as a marker of poor prognosis among AE-ILD survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessments and estimates of prognosis are needed for comprehensive care and planning of subsequent treatment in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We investigated HRQoL and its association with survival using a disease-specific tool in patients with IPF., Methods: The patients were recruited from the real-life FinnishIPF study in 2015. HRQoL was assessed with the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) questionnaire every six months for 2.5 years. Dyspnoea was assessed with the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale. Survival was registered until 31 December 2022. Patient survival according to the K-BILD total score was evaluated using the Kaplan‒Meier method. The Friedman test was used to compare the K-BILD total scores longitudinally, and the Mann‒Whitney U test was used to compare the mMRC groups. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant., Results: The median K-BILD total score (n = 245) was 51.6. At baseline, patients in the highest HRQoL quartile (K-BILD scores 58.9-100) had a longer median survival time (5.3 years) than did those with scores of 51.7-58.8 (3.1 years), 45.7-51.6 (2.3 years), and 0.0-45.6 (1.8 years). A decrease in the K-BILD total score of ≥ 5 units in the preceding 12 or 24 months showed a trend towards poorer survival, although statistical significance was not reached. Ninety-four patients survived more than 2.5 years and had available K-BILD data at all time points. The K-BILD total score remained higher in patients with a baseline mMRC of 0-1 than in those with a mMRC of 2-4, and the total score decreased only modestly in both groups (median of 3.3 and 4.8 units in patients with mMRC scores of 0-1 and 2-4, respectively)., Conclusions: In IPF, a reduced HRQoL is associated with impaired survival. A K-BILD total score less than approximately 50 units is associated with a median survival of approximately two years. In addition to assessing the treatment needs of patients with IPF using K-BILD, a decreased score may be useful for facilitating advance care planning and transplantation assessment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

BACKGROUND: The need for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is usually a sign of advanced disease, which could trigger advance care planning. However, LTOT is used in patients with different characteristics and multiple diagnoses beyond COPD. We studied the factors associated with survival in an unselected sample of subjects who started LTOT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that included 195 subjects for whom LTOT was initiated in Tampere University Hospital from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015, and followed up until December 31, 2017. RESULTS: The most frequent diseases that caused the need for LTOT were COPD and interstitial lung diseases. Most of the subjects (69%) died during the study period; the median survival time was 2.2 y. The subjects with interstitial lung disease as a primary disease for LTOT had a shorter survival time (median 0.9 y) compared with those with COPD (median 2.4 y, P < .001). Survival was shorter in the subjects ages >75 y (median 1.4 y) compared with those who were ages ≤75 y (median 2.8 y, P = .001) and also in those who required help with daily activities (median 1.2 y) compared with those who did not (median 3.3 y, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.2), Charlson comorbidity index (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.43), and required help in activities of daily living (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.1) were associated with impaired survival. CONCLUSIONS: The survival of the subjects who started LTOT varied greatly. The subjects with interstitial lung disease and those who required assistance with activities of daily living were at risk of dying in ~1 y, which suggested that advance care planning should be directed especially to these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Risk predicting models have been applied in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but still not validated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The purpose of this study was to test the suitability of three prediction models as well as individual lung function and demographic factors for evaluating the prognosis of RA-ILD patients.Methods: Clinical and radiological data of 59 RA-ILD patients was re-assessed. GAP (gender, age, physiologic variables) and the modified interstitial lung disease (ILD)-GAP as well as the composite physiologic indexes (CPI) were tested for predicting mortality using the goodness-of-fit test and Cox model. Potential predictors of mortality were also sought from single lung function parameters and clinical characteristics.Results: The median survival was 152 and 61 months in GAP / ILD-GAP stages I and II (p = 0.017). Both GAP and ILD-GAP models accurately estimated 1-year, 2-year and 3-year mortality. CPI (p = 0.025), GAP (p = 0.008) and ILD-GAP (p = 0.028) scores, age (p = 0.002), baseline diffusion capacity to carbon monoxide (DLCO) (p = 0.014) and hospitalization due to respiratory reasons (p = 0.039), were significant predictors of mortality in the univariate analysis, whereas forced vital capacity (FVC) was not predictive. CPI score (HR 1.03, p = 0.018) and baseline DLCO (HR 0.97, p = 0.011) remained significant predictors of mortality after adjusting for age.Conclusions: GAP and ILD-GAP are applicable for evaluating the risk of death of patients with RA-ILD in a similar manner as in those with IPF. Baseline DLCO and CPI score also predicted survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics, causes of death and factors impacting on the prognosis of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) with a history of acute exacerbation (AE) of IPF or FILD., Methods: Retrospective data of hospital treatment periods caused by AE-IPF and AE-FILD were collected from medical records. Clinical features and survival data of IPF and non-IPF cases were evaluated and compared. The underlying and immediate causes of death were gathered from death certificates., Results: A total of 128 patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. IPF (n=79/62%), rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD; n=17/14%) and asbestosis (n=11/8.6%) were the most common FILD subgroups in the study. The median survival after hospitalisation in AE-IPF was 2.6 months compared with 21 months in other AE-FILDs (p<0.001). The survival difference was not explained by age, gender or pulmonary function test results at the time of hospitalisation. Patients with non-specific interstitial pneumonia and RA-ILD had the most favourable prognosis. ILD was the most common underlying cause of death in both patients with IPF and with other FILD accounting for 87% and 78% of deaths, respectively., Conclusions: We detected a significantly longer survival in AE of patients with non-IPF compared with that of AE-IPFs. The prognosis of patients was affected by the underlying lung disease since pulmonary fibrosis was the underlying cause of death in the majority of all patients with FILD having experienced an AE., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JS reports congress fees and travel costs from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Ratiopharm and Roche, and lecture fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Orion Pharma and Roche outside the submitted work. MP reports lecture fee from Boehringer-Ingelheim Finland and congress fee and travel costs from Roche, outside the submitted work. RB has nothing to disclose. RK reports consultant fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Boehringer-Ingelheim, lecture fees from Roche and Boehringer-Ingelheim, and a congress travel costs from Orion outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)