Search

Knowing which intervention strategies work best and for which student is essential for teachers when they intervene in cases of bullying. The effects of teachers' (1) condemning, (2) empathy-raising, and (3) combined (including elements of both) messages on students' intention to stop bullying were tested in a between-subject experimental design. A total of 277 seventh grade students (Mage = 12.93, SD = 0.49; 47% female) were asked to imagine they had bullied a peer and were invited to a discussion with a teacher. They saw a video vignette with one of the above messages. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that students' intention to stop bullying was highest among those who saw the combined message. Callous-unemotional traits were negatively, and affective and cognitive empathy positively associated with intention to stop bullying. Students' level of cognitive empathy moderated the relative effect of the condemning message on intention to stop bullying. At low levels of cognitive empathy, the condemning message was the least effective, whereas among those with high cognitive empathy, all messages were equally likely to lead to intention to stop bullying. Together, the findings suggest that for educators intervening in bullying among adolescents, an approach involving both condemning and empathy-raising messages is the 'best bet', most likely to lead to intention to stop bullying. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To assess the effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment ( CGA)-based individually targeted interventions on the ability to walk 400 m in pre-frail or frail and non-frail community-dwelling older people. Methods A subgroups analysis of a population-based comparative study, the Geriatric Multidisciplinary Strategy for the Good Care of the Elderly ( GeMS) was carried out in the city of Kuopio, Finland, from 2004 to 2007. This study was based on data from 2005 to 2007. The present analysis included 605 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥76 years (mean age 80.9, 70% women), 314 in the intervention and 291 in the control group. Frailty status was assessed in 2005. Mobility was assessed by self-reported ability to walk 400 m. The generalized estimating equation model with binary logistic regression was used to assess the treatment effect of the interventions on the ability to walk 400 m between 2005 and 2007. Results In 2005, 55% ( n = 173) of the participants in the intervention group and 64% ( n = 187) in the control group were pre-frail or frail. The intervention prevented the loss of ability to walk 400 m among pre-frail and frail persons ( OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93, P = 0.01). The treatment effect was not statistically significant among non-frail participants ( OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68-1.42, P = 0.94). Conclusions CGA-based individually targeted interventions were effective in preventing mobility limitations among pre-frail and frail older people. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; 15: 80-88. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]