Search

The article discusses the results of a study on the endogeneity of money in several Pacific Island countries (PIC) using some econometric methods. It states the statistical significance of a narrow money, which would indicate the possibility that an increase in the reserve would result in greater narrow money in the long term. Based on Granger Casuality Test, a bi-directional causality was observed between aggregates and reserve money for Fiji and Vanuatu. It was noted both Fiji and Vanuatu cannot depend on reserve money.

Pacific island countries (PICs), ever since their independence during the second half of the last century, have been among the world's top ten recipients of official development assistance (ODA) on a per capita basis. Until the mid 1990s, most of them were receiving aid from their erstwhile colonial masters for budgetary support. With the introduction of reforms in ODA delivery in the late 1990s with focus on program and project-tied aid, it was expected that aid would directly facilitate creation of much-needed growth enhancing infrastructures, physical as well as social, since domestic savings were found to be insufficient to finance them. However, continued stagnation in some PICs and deterioration in some others have been causing concerns. This paper seeks to examine the effectiveness of aid by undertaking a case study of Fiji, which has a longer time series data needed for econometric investigation. Based on the study's findings, the paper lists some policy conclusions relevant to the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Pacific island countries (PICs) have been among the world's top ten recipients of official development assistance (ODA) on a per capita basis. This paper seeks to examine the effectiveness of external aid by undertaking a panel data study covering five countries in the South Pacific, namely Fiji, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga and Vanuatu utilizing the annual data over a twenty-five year period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]