Search

The penetration rate of Climate Related Energy sources like solar-power, wind-power and hydro-power source is potentially low as a result of the large space and time variability of their driving climatic variables. Increased penetration rates can be achieved with mixes of sources. Optimal mixes, i.e. obtained with the optimal share for each source, are being identified for a number of regions worldwide. However, they often consider wind and solar power only. Based on 33 years of daily data (1980–2012) for a set of 12 European regions, we re-estimate the optimal mix when wild run-of-the-river energy is included in the solar/wind mix. It is found to be highly region dependent but the highest shares are often obtained for run-of-the-river, ranging from 35% to 65% in Belarus and England. High solar shares (>40%) are found in southern countries but solar shares drop to less than 15% in northern countries. Wind shares range from 10 to 35% with the exception of Norway where it reaches 50%. These results put in perspective the optimal 60%–40% wind/solar mix currently used for Europe. For all regions, including run-of-the-river in the mix allows increasing the penetration rate of CREs (from 1 to 8% points). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study focuses on academic institutional repositories as tools that allow us open access to scientific and academic production. Specifically, we analyze the Top 50 European University repositories differentiating, firstly, those repositories linked to Spanish universities compared to those belonging to universities throughout Europe and, secondly, repositories that only include research content as opposed to those that also include teaching content. Specifically, this work complements previous studies on the consolidation of the repositories, focusing on the analysis of the competitive environment by considering their participation and relative visibility shares. The analysis, using competitive maps and comparative advantage method, allows us to identify European university repositories that lead their segments, in terms of their levels of participation and web visibility in the market. In general, without distinguishing by segments, results show that the leadership at European level in terms of participation is held by the University College of London (UK) and the repository of the University of Umea (Sweden) is the leader in visibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The paper presents a broadband diffusion analysis for European OECD member countries. The Bass diffusion model is used to estimate the total number of potential adopters, the coefficient of innovation and the coefficient of imitation. The analysis shows that if the present trends continue broadband services will not reach the 100% penetration rate in the near future. Based on these findings, the question of a possible revitalization is discussed with a focus on those segments of the population which are slower to adopt broadband. A survey of households in rural areas provides preliminary investigation of reasons for continuing non-adoption, such as social habits and lack of both knowledge and interest. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The diffusion of broadband in Europe is shaped by the penetration rates of the individual European countries. However, the contribution of each country to the total level of diffusion is not the same, due to the existence of a digital divide among the countries. The digital divide is still evident and although diffusion keeps increasing, not all countries have the same rate of broadband adoption. Based on the above, a methodology measuring the digital divide gap is presented in the context of this research, together with forecasts regarding broadband convergence. Evaluation of the methodology was performed for the European countries examined from 2001 to 2009. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: A mass-balance model was extended to investigate the influence of aerosol particles on the accumulation of indoor airborne DEHP, which allows the consideration of a variable particle concentration. The calculated gas-phase di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) concentration is consistent with those measured within residences in both the United States and Europe. Model predictions suggest that there are differences of more than 10% of particle-phase DEHP concentrations between the variable-particle-concentration case and the constant one for over half (578 days) within the calculation time of 1000 days. Airborne DEHP consists primarily of a particle phase. The exposure data indicate that the influence of particle dynamics remains significant throughout the calculation period, and the size fraction of 0–0.5 μm contributes the most, at 39.1%, to the total exposure to particle-phase DEHP as a result of a strong “source” effect which brings particles into the indoor air and a weak “sink” effect which removes particles from the indoor air. The sensitivity analysis indicates that deposition exhibits the most apparent influence, and particle emission from cooking is a significant factor, as cooking is the main source of particles in the size fraction of 0–0.5 μm. The sensitivity analysis also shows that particle penetration has a less obvious influence on the exposure to airborne DEHP because air exchange rate caused penetration introduces and removes particles simultaneously, thus having a limited influence on the airborne DEHP; while resuspension exhibits the weakest influence because it contributes little to the small particles which are the main component of aerosol particles indoors. Strategies for enhancing deposition and reducing particle emissions from cooking and penetration may be helpful to reduce residents’ exposure to airborne SVOCs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The objectives of this study were to assess the factors which contribute to individuals' health motivation to address hearing loss and to gather baseline data that could then be used to measure the impact of an awareness campaign. An online questionnaire with 13 closed set questions was completed by 100 subjects in each country including Austria, Germany, France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The questionnaire was based around the Health Belief Model, which describes how, in order to take action to address a medical problem, the individual must perceive that the condition presents a threat to their well-being that exceeds any barriers to treatment. Good hearing was regarded as being important in all countries. There was agreement that the main sign of hearing loss was turning up the TV or radio. In most countries, hearing aids were thought to be not particularly visible, not require much maintenance, a hindrance while doing sport, and must be removed before bed. Perceptions of hearing implants were that they were permanently fitted, not externally visible, and do not need to be removed before bed. Medical issues were mostly researched through a doctor and then via the Internet. In this sample, there was a good understanding of the consequences and signs of hearing loss, but although hearing implants were viewed as being different to hearing aids, there was little understanding that the external speech processor was similar to a hearing aid in its physical characteristics. When actions were taken, the key professionals consulted about hearing problems were the general practitioner and ear, nose, and throat specialist.