Search

European and Mediterranean corn borers are two of the most economically important insect pests of maize (Zea mays L.) in North America and southern Europe, respectively. Cell wall structure and composition were evaluated in pith and rind tissues of resistant and susceptible inbred lines as possible corn borer resistance traits. Composition of cell wall polysaccharides, lignin concentration and composition, and cell wall bound forms of hydroxycinnamic acids were measured. As expected, most of the cell wall components were found at higher concentrations in the rind than in the pith tissues, with the exception of galactose and total diferulate esters. Pith of resistant inbred lines had significantly higher concentrations of total cell wall material than susceptible inbred lines, indicating that the thickness of cell walls could be the initial barrier against corn borer larvae attack. Higher concentrations of cell wall xylose and 8-O-4-coupled diferulate were found in resistant inbreds. Stem tunneling by corn borers was negatively correlated with concentrations of total diferulates, 8-5-diferulate and p-coumarate esters. Higher total cell wall, xylose, and 8-coupled diferulates concentrations appear to be possible mechanisms of corn borer resistance., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) semolina water-extractable arabinoxylan (TWEAX) (yield 0.28%, arabinose-to-xylose ratio (A/X) 0. 62) was fractionated by a stepwise increase in ethanol concentration (up to 65%). The A/X ratios of the resulting fractions varied between 0.42 and 0.80. With increasing ethanol concentrations, increasing A/X ratios went hand in hand with a relative increase of low molecular weight compounds, indicating that high molecular weight compounds with a low A/X ratio are preferentially precipitated from alcohol/water mixtures. (1)H NMR showed that, whereas in TWEAX the levels of unsubstituted xyloses (X(0)), monosubstituted (X(1)), and disubstituted (X(2)) xyloses were 63.1%, 11.8%, and 25.1%, respectively, fractions that precipitated with increasing ethanol concentrations had decreasing levels of X(0). Simultaneously, the level of X(1) decreased equally until it leveled of at ca. 10%. Concomitantly, the level of X(2) increased. The levels of X(0), X(1), and X(2) varied between 69.7% and 53.4%, 18.2% and 10.7%, and 12.2% and 35.9%, respectively.