Search

The purpose of the present substudy of the Lipid Treatment Assessment Project 2 was to assess dual C-reactive protein (CRP) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goal attainment across a spectrum of low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients with dyslipidemia in 8 countries in North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia. Of the 9,518 patients studied overall, 45% were women, 64% had hypertension, 31% had diabetes, 14% were current smokers, 60% were high risk, and 79% were taking a statin. The median CRP level was 1.5 mg/L (interquartile range 0.2 to 2.8). On multivariate analysis, higher CRP levels were associated with older age, female gender, hypertension, current smoking, greater body mass index, larger waist circumference, LDL cholesterol level, and triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. In contrast, being from Asia or taking a statin was associated with lower levels. Across all risk groups, 59% of patients attained the CRP target of <2 mg/L, and 33% had <1 mg/L. Overall, 44% of patients attained both their National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL cholesterol target and a CRP level of <2 mg/L, but only 26% attained their LDL cholesterol target and a CRP level of <1 mg/L. In the very high-risk group with coronary heart disease and ≥2 risk factors, only 19% attained both their LDL cholesterol goal and a CRP level of <2 mg/L and 12% their LDL cholesterol goal and a CRP level of <1 mg/L. In conclusion, with current treatment, most dyslipidemic patients do not reach the dual CRP and LDL cholesterol goals. Smoking cessation, weight reduction, and the greater use of more potent statins at higher doses might be able to improve these outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study evaluated the success in attaining non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goals in the multinational L-TAP 2 study., Methods: 9955 patients ≥20 years of age with dyslipidemia on stable lipid-lowering therapy were enrolled from nine countries., Results: Success rates for non-HDL-C goals were 86% in low, 70% in moderate, and 52% in high-risk patients (63% overall). In patients with triglycerides of >200 mg/dL success rates for non-HDL-C goals were 35% vs. 69% in those with ≤200 mg/dL (p < 0.0001). Among patients attaining their LDL-C goal, 18% did not attain their non-HDL-C goal. In those with coronary disease and at least two risk factors, only 34% and 30% attained respectively their non-HDL-C and LDL-C goals. Rates of failure in attaining both LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals were highest in Latin America., Conclusions: Non-HDL-C goal attainment lagged behind LDL-C goal attainment; this gap was greatest in higher-risk patients., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

There is a well-established link between dyslipidemia and cardiovascular events, although this risk is modified by age. Little is known about how treatment of dyslipidemia and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goal attainment differ between older and younger patients. We obtained clinical data from 9,926 dyslipidemic patients across 9 countries in North and Latin America, Europe, and Asia from 2006 through 2007. Multivariate regressions were performed to determine predictors of lipid level goal attainment. The study sample consisted of 5,733 adults <65 and 4,193 adults ≥65 years old. Compared with younger patients, older patients were more likely to have diabetes (32.5% vs 30.0%, p = 0.0014) and hypertension (73.4% vs 57.0%, p <0.0001), to be classified as high risk (68.6% vs 53.2%, p <0.0001), and to be taking a statin (79.1% vs 72.0%, p <0.0001). However, they were less likely to smoke (8.2% vs 17.6%, p <0.0001) or to have metabolic syndrome (29.0% vs 34.4%, p <0.0001). Older patients had lower LDL cholesterol levels (95.1 vs 103.9 mg/dl, p <0.0001) and higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (54.2 vs 51.5 mg/dl, p <0.0001). LDL cholesterol goal attainment was 74.7% in older and 71.1% in younger patients (p = 0.036). Older patients were more likely to achieve LDL targets whether low risk (89.8% vs 84.6%, p = 0.002), moderate risk (79.0% vs 71.9%, p = 0.0006), or high risk (70.5% vs 64.4%, p <0.0001). In conclusion, older patients had different risk profiles and better lipid levels compared with their younger counterparts. They were more likely to attain their LDL cholesterol goal, perhaps because of greater statin use, different risk profiles, or survival bias., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)