Search

Background: Murepavadin (POL7080) represents the first member of a novel class of outer membrane protein-targeting antibiotics. Murepavadin acts by binding to LPS transport protein D and is being developed for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Objectives: To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of murepavadin against XDR P. aeruginosa.Methods: A total of 785 clinical isolates of XDR P. aeruginosa were collected in 2016-17 through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 34 medical centres in 21 European nations (n = 353) and 75 medical centres in North America (n = 432). Isolates were categorized as XDR when susceptible (CLSI) to ≤2 of the following antimicrobial classes: antipseudomonal cephalosporins, carbapenems, broad-spectrum penicillin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and polymyxins. Susceptibility testing was performed by the reference broth microdilution method and EUCAST and CLSI interpretative criteria were applied.Results: Murepavadin (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L) inhibited 96.7% of isolates at ≤0.5 mg/L and was 8-fold more active than colistin (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/L). Only seven isolates (0.9%) exhibited murepavadin MIC values >4 mg/L. Colistin (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/L; 93.6% susceptible) was the most active comparator, followed by ceftolozane/tazobactam (MIC50/90, 2/>32 mg/L; 70.6% susceptible) and tobramycin (MIC50/90, 8/>8 mg/L; 47.5% susceptible). Murepavadin remained active against isolates that were non-susceptible to colistin (n = 50; MIC50/90, 0.25/0.25 mg/L), ceftolozane/tazobactam (n = 231; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L) and/or tobramycin (n = 412; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L).Conclusions: Murepavadin exhibited potent activity against a large collection of clinical XDR P. aeruginosa isolates from Europe and North America, including isolates that were non-susceptible to colistin, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or tobramycin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators tested against European isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from hospitalized patients with urinary tract infection or intraabdominal infections.Methods: A total of 6553 Gram-negative organisms (603 P. aeruginosa and 5950 Enterobacteriaceae) were consecutively collected from 41 hospitals located in 17 European countries plus Israel and Turkey. The organisms were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods and the results interpreted according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoint criteria.Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam [MIC 50/90 0.25/1 mg/L; 93.5%/91.3% susceptible (S) (CLSI/EUCAST criteria)] and meropenem [MIC 50/90  ≤0.06/≤0.06 mg/L; 98.1%/98.3% S (CLSI/EUCAST)] were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 1.9% were carbapenem resistant (CRE), 15.2% exhibited an ESBL non-CRE phenotype, 14.6% were MDR, 2.2% were XDR and <0.1% were pan-drug resistant (PDR). Whereas ceftolozane/tazobactam showed activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype isolates (MIC 50/90 0.5/8 mg/L), it lacked useful activity against strains with a CRE (MIC 50/90  >32/>32 mg/L; 3.6% S) or PDR (MIC 50  >32 mg/L; 0.0% S) phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC 50/90 0.5/4 mg/L) β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 91.7% at an MIC of ≤4 mg/L. P. aeruginosa exhibited high rates of resistance to cefepime (20.6%), ceftazidime (23.1%), meropenem (9.0%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (26.9%) (EUCAST criteria). Among these four P. aeruginosa resistant phenotypes, 61.3%-70.4% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam.Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam when tested against Enterobacteriaceae. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We evaluated the susceptibility rates for piperacillin/tazobactam tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Europe (EU), Latin America (LA), and North America (NA) for 1997 to 2007. A total of 25 460 isolates were tested originating from APAC (4441), EU (7695), LA (4277), and NA (9047). All testing was performed by reference broth microdilution methods. The samples were collected from >110 medical centers and samples averaging >30 nations/year. For this analysis, results from 1997 to 2007, 1997 to 1999, 2005 to 2007, APAC, EU, LA, and NA were assessed against several broad-spectrum β-lactams, including cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, and piperacillin alone, for a total of 12 agents overall. Using P. aeruginosa breakpoints (≤64 μg/mL), piperacillin/tazobactam had the broadest coverage (% susceptible) in 2 regions (EU, LA) and, overall, at 83.6% followed by meropenem (83.0%) > imipenem (79.7%) > piperacillin (79.5%) > cefepime (77.5%) > ceftazidime (75.8%). Other non–β-lactam activity results were ciprofloxacin at only 71.5% susceptible, but tobramycin and polymyxin B had higher susceptibility rates (81.0% and 99.5%, respectively). Trends toward piperacillin/tazobactam resistance were noted between 1997 to 1999 and 2000 to 2007 in APAC (−11.6% susceptibility), NA (−4.0%), and EU (−2.3%). LA susceptibility rates were lowest overall but actually increased recently by +2.9% (current rate, 79.4% susceptible). For β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, susceptibility rates were higher for piperacillin/tazobactam when compared in all regions with piperacillin alone (+2.6–7.1%) and greatest for LA isolates. In contrast, ticarcillin/clavulanate susceptibility rates were lower than ticarcillin tested alone in NA (−1.5%, antagonism), and this agent only inhibited 70.3% of isolates worldwide. In conclusion, piperacillin/tazobactam remained a very active β-lactam when tested in vitro against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa found in the SENTRY Program (1997–2007). Trends toward slightly decreased susceptibility were noted in all regions over the last decade (except LA); only polymyxins had susceptibility rates at >90%. Resistance surveillance programs should be sustained to document emerging resistance patterns of old and newer agents for difficult-to-treat pathogens such as P. aeruginosa. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistance determinants [extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases and OXA-type β-lactamases] in contemporary clinical Enterobacterales isolates and to determine the in vitro activity of β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, including the investigational combination of cefepime and the novel β-lactamase inhibitor enmetazobactam., Methods: Antibacterial susceptibility of 7168 clinical Enterobacterales isolates obtained between 2016-2018 from North America and Europe was determined according to CLSI guidelines. Phenotypic resistance to the 3GC ceftazidime (MIC ≥ 16 µg/mL) and/or ceftriaxone (MIC ≥ 4 µg/mL) but retaining susceptibility to meropenem (MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL) was determined. β-Lactamase genotyping was performed on clinical isolates with ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime or meropenem MIC ≥ 1 µg/mL., Results: Phenotypic resistance to 3GCs occurred in 17.5% of tested isolates, whereas 2.1% of isolates were resistant to the carbapenem meropenem. Within the 3GC-resistant subgroup, 60.1% (n = 752) of isolates encoded an ESBL, 25.6% (n = 321) encoded an AmpC-type β-lactamase and 0.9% (n = 11) encoded an OXA-type β-lactamase. Susceptibility of the subgroup to piperacillin/tazobactam (57.5%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (71.3%) was <90% based on breakpoints established by the CLSI. Projected susceptibility to cefepime/enmetazobactam was 99.6% when applying the cefepime susceptible, dose-dependent breakpoint of 8 µg/mL. Against ESBL-producing isolates (n = 801) confirmed by genotyping, only susceptibility to meropenem (96.0%) and cefepime/enmetazobactam (99.9%) exceeded 90%., Conclusion: This study describes the antibacterial activity of important therapies against contemporary 3GC-resistant clinical Enterobacterales isolates and supports the development of cefepime/enmetazobactam as a carbapenem-sparing option for ESBL-producing pathogens., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest AB is a paid consultant for Allecra Therapeutics SAS; PK is an employee of Allecra Therapeutics SAS; IM, SH and NK are employees of IHMA Europe Sàrl., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against contemporary Gram-negative bacteria. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-established β-lactamase inhibitor., Methods: A total of 10 532 Gram-negative organisms (2191 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 8341 Enterobacteriaceae) were consecutively collected from 31 medical centres located in 13 European countries plus Turkey and Israel. The organisms were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods as described by the CLSI M07-A9 document and the results interpreted according to EUCAST as well as CLSI breakpoint criteria. Selected ceftazidime- and/or meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were screened for the presence of β-lactamase genes by PCR., Results: P. aeruginosa exhibited high rates of multidrug-resistant (31.9%) and extensively drug-resistant (24.6%) isolates and 11.6% of isolates were susceptible only to colistin. When tested against P. aeruginosa, ceftolozane/tazobactam (MIC(50), 1 mg/L) was generally 4-fold more active than ceftazidime (MIC(50), 4 mg/L) and inhibited >90% of isolates with an MIC of ≤8 mg/L in nine countries. In contrast, the highest susceptibility rates observed for ceftazidime and meropenem, respectively, were 86.0%/86.0% (UK) and 85.2%/86.1% (Ireland) (67.2%/67.1% overall). Ceftolozane/tazobactam (MIC(50/90), 0.25/2 mg/L; 93.7% and 95.2% inhibited at ≤4 and ≤8 mg/L, respectively), meropenem [MIC(50/90), ≤0.06/≤0.06 mg/L; 98.0% susceptible (EUCAST)] and tigecycline [MIC(50/90), 0.12/1 mg/L; 94.1% susceptible (EUCAST)] were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacteriaceae., Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam when tested against Enterobacteriaceae., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is under clinical development for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAI), complicated urinary tract infections (UTI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia. We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Gram-negative aerobic bacteria causing IAI and healthcare-associated UTI (HCA-UTI). The organisms were consecutively collected from January to December 2012 from 59 medical centers located in the United States (USA) and 15 European countries by the Program to Assess Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS). The collection included 809 organisms from IAI and 2474 organisms from HCA-UTI, and susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution methods as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M07-A9 document. Overall, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequently isolated pathogens from both infection types. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was very active against E. coli (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/L; 98.5-99.9% inhibited at an MIC of ≤8 mg/L) and retained activity against many of the multidrug-resistant (MDR; MIC50/90, 0.5/2->32 mg/L) and ESBL-phenotype strains (MIC50/90, 0.5/2-32 mg/L). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was active against most K. pneumoniae strains (MIC50/90, 0.25/16 mg/L, 88.9-89.6% inhibited at an MIC of ≤8 mg/L), but some ESBL-phenotype (MIC50/90, 4-8/>32 mg/L) and MDR (MIC50/90, 16/>32 mg/L) isolates exhibited elevated MIC values. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active agent tested against P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 mg/L; 93.4-95.7% inhibited at ≤8 mg/L) and retained potency against many MDR (MIC50/90, 2-4/>32 mg/L), ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (MIC50/90, 2-4/>32 mg/L) and meropenem-nonsusceptible (MIC50/90, 2/>32 mg/L) strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was also active against Klebsiella oxytoca (MIC50/90, ≤0.12-0.25/0.5-1 mg/L), Enterobacter spp. (MIC50/90, 0.25-0.5/4-8 mg/L), Citrobacter spp. (MIC50/90, 0.25/2-32 mg/L), Proteus mirabilis (MIC50/90, 0.5/0.5 mg/L), indole-positive Proteae (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5-1 mg/L), and Serratia spp. (MIC50/90, 0.5/1-2 mg/L). In summary, ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated potent in vitro activity when tested against contemporary aerobic Gram-negative pathogens causing IAI and HCA-UTI in USA and European medical centers., (Copyright © 2014 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Resistance patterns that are currently problematic in Europe can vary greatly within the same species over time, among various patient populations and among geographic regions on the same continent. The results from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program, which monitors carbapenem resistance rates in institutions using meropenem, were used to determine resistance differences among Proteus mirabilis. MIC results from 688 P. mirabilis strains were classified into 4 patient care groups: ICU (n=426), neutropenia patients (NP; n=145), general wards (n=97) and cystic fibrosis patients (CF; n=20). A total of 40 centers from 12 European countries have participated since 1997, divided into 3 geographic regions (East, North, South). All testing was performed by NCCLS reference methods and interpretive criteria, including screening of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) phenotypes. Over the monitored interval the resistance rates varied for each agent without a clear trend toward a greater rate. Rank order of susceptibility was: meropenem (99%) > piperacillin/tazobactam (TAZ; 96%) > cefepime (95%) > ceftazidime (CAZ; 94%) > imipenem (IPM; 92%). Ciprofloxacin (CIP) was the least active agent tested (MIC90 4 microg/ml; 86% susceptible). Unexpectedly, 3.6% of P. mirabilis were imipenem-resistant (MIC, > or = 16 microg/ml). Greater rates of resistance were found for strains from NP and CF patients, and from eastern or southern European sites, usually associated with epidemic clusters. Generally susceptible species such as P. mirabilis have recently emerged as therapeutic problems in European medical centers following mutations that compromise CIP, CAZ and aminoglycoside use. Imipenem also showed decreased susceptibility of greater than 7% compared to less than 1% for meropenem. Continued surveillance by the MYSTIC Program appears to be a prudent practice to focus effective empiric treatment regimens.